Jump to content

GTX 1070 severely under performing

I already found the problem, but I wanted to share this in case it might benefit someone else with a similar problem.

 

System: MSI 1070 Gaming X (not overclocked, MSI gaming app, latest nVidia drivers installed), 8700K (not overclocked, with Coolermaster 612 tower cooler), Asus PrimeA motherboard with 64GB Corsair DDR4 @ 2666 with XMP enabled, 700W Thermaltake PSU. (Sytem used for Lightroom high volume photo editing and gaming)

 

The symptoms: Low FPS (around 30 with lows reaching 17) in 1440p at Ultra settings, lowering settings to High and 1080p did not significantly improve results. 3D Mark FireStrike score of around 9000 (instead of around 17000). But it does fine in some other benchmarks. [A GTX 1070 should reach at least 70 FPS in most games at 1440p with settings at Ultra]

EDIT: ... should reach at least 70 FPS in most games at 1440p with settings at High, please also see http://www.guru3d.com/articles-pages/msi-geforce-gtx-1070-gaming-x-review,1.html

 

Things to consider (gathered from other threads with similar issues): Some GPU tweaking software with an FPS counter overlay (like the MSI gaming App) may hurt performance in some cases, installing/re-installing the latest drivers is usually step 1. Disabling V-sync (or switching to "adaptive" may help in some cases. Some games are just badly optimised and CPU-bound. BUT, most cases ended up being a CPU bottleneck of some sort. (1) Either the CPU is old/under-powered and pinned at a 100% load, (2) the CPU is overheating and thus thermal trotting, or (3) An unstable overclock is keeping the clock cycles low.

 

In my case, the CPU was doing fine at 37 C, and very low load during gaming. With light tasks it wasn't boosting (keeping at 0.75 GHz), I also noticed very bad performance in Adobe Lightroom (photo editing) - thinking it was the GPU since with heavy loads (Prime95 and Cinebench) the CPU was reaching the rated 4.3 GHz - which is a good speed when all 6 cores are working hard. The Cinebench score was good as well...

 

The culprit: Control Panel > Power Options > "Power saver" >:(

Turns out, with this enabled, the the system cooling policy (under advanced settings) is set to "passive", which means that operating system slows the processor before increasing fan speed. Under heavy loads this is ignored and the CPU seems to be doing its job fine, but moderate to light loads are severely impeded.

 

I hope this post help someone and saves them the 7 days it took me to figure this out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

mhmm haha whenever i get a new system i immediately change the power option to high performance mode. (unless its a laptop)

Main Rig: CPU Intel Xeon X5660 (4.55Ghz @ 1.45v) / MOBO Asus ROG Rampage III Extreme / RAM 16GB Corsair Vengeance LPX1866 MHz / CPU COOLER ID-COOLING Frostflow+ 240 / GPU EVGA Titan X Hybrid (+630 core + 400 memory) / CASE Cooler Master CM 690 II Advanced + transparent side panel / SSD Crucial M550 512GB / PSU Cooler Master Silent Pro Gold 1200W / DISPLAY 1440p monitor / KEYBOARD Topre Realforce RGB / MOUSE Corsair Glaive Aluminum RGB / SOUND Creative Labs. X-Fi SoundBlaster Elite Pro / ROUTER Netgear R9000 X10 Wireless ad / OS Windows 10 Pro / DRIVING WHEEL Logitech G27
 
Web Server Rig: CPU 2x Intel Xeon X5680 / MOBO Supermicro X8DTL-i / RAM 64GB (2X32GB) SK-Hynix ECC LRDIMMs / CPU COOLER ID-COOLING Frostflow+ 120 + Corsair H50 AIO / GPU MSI GTX 1070 Gaming X (+250core +300 memory) / CASE NZXT Lexa S / SSD Kingston 120GB / HDD 4 x 3TB WD RAID 6 / PSU Enermax MaxRevo 1500W / DISPLAY 900p monitor / KEYBOARD Logitech / MOUSE Logitech
 
Actually Portable Laptop: HP Spectre x360 15' (Late 2018) / i7-8750H, 16GB RAM, 512GB SSD, GTX 1050Ti MaxQ, 4K Display / KEYBOARD Ducky One 2 Mini / OS Linux Mint 19 Cinnamon / WIRELESS ADAPTER NETGEAR A6210 USB 3.0
 
Bed Laptop: ASUS VIVOBOOK 15 / i5-8250U, 8GB RAM, 1TB Toshiba HDD, UHD 630, 1080P Display / OS Linux Mint 19 Cinnamon

 

Backup Rig: CPU Intel Xeon X3470 (4Ghz @ 1.4v) / MOBO MSI P55-GD80 / RAM 16GB HyperX 1600Mhz / CPU COOLER ID-COOLING Frostflow+ 120 / GPU Sapphire R9 270X (+150 core + 200 memory) / CASE Cooler Master Elite 343 SSD Crucial MX150 250GB / PSU Seasonic SS430-GB / KEYBOARD Logitech G910 Orion Spark / MOUSE Logitech / DISPLAY Dell SE2417HGR / OS Windows 10 Pro / WIRELESS ADAPTER

TP-LINK Archer T6E PCI-E

 

Server 1: DELL POWEREDGE 1950 / 2x Intel Xeon E5450, 16GB ECC, 4x 3TB Western Digital (Various) 7200RPM SATA HDD in RAID 6, GT 640 / DISPLAY Lenovo L2251p

 

Server 2: DELL POWEREDGE 1950 / 2x Intel Xeon E5420, 8GB ECC, 2 x 160GB SAS, GT 210

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Spikkel said:

A GTX 1070 should reach at least 70 FPS in most games at 1440p with settings at Ultra

False. Ultra settings will need a 1080ti. A 1070 can only do this in high, possibly a mix of high and medium in most cases.

CPU: i7-2600K 4751MHz 1.44V (software) --> 1.47V at the back of the socket Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Extreme4 (BCLK: 103.3MHz) CPU Cooler: Noctua NH-D15 RAM: Adata XPG 2x8GB DDR3 (XMP: 2133MHz 10-11-11-30 CR2, custom: 2203MHz 10-11-10-26 CR1 tRFC:230 tREFI:14000) GPU: Asus GTX 1070 Dual (Super Jetstream vbios, +70(2025-2088MHz)/+400(8.8Gbps)) SSD: Samsung 840 Pro 256GB (main boot drive), Transcend SSD370 128GB PSU: Seasonic X-660 80+ Gold Case: Antec P110 Silent, 5 intakes 1 exhaust Monitor: AOC G2460PF 1080p 144Hz (150Hz max w/ DP, 121Hz max w/ HDMI) TN panel Keyboard: Logitech G610 Orion (Cherry MX Blue) with SteelSeries Apex M260 keycaps Mouse: BenQ Zowie FK1

 

Model: HP Omen 17 17-an110ca CPU: i7-8750H (0.125V core & cache, 50mV SA undervolt) GPU: GTX 1060 6GB Mobile (+80/+450, 1650MHz~1750MHz 0.78V~0.85V) RAM: 8+8GB DDR4-2400 18-17-17-39 2T Storage: HP EX920 1TB PCIe x4 M.2 SSD + Crucial MX500 1TB 2.5" SATA SSD, 128GB Toshiba PCIe x2 M.2 SSD (KBG30ZMV128G) gone cooking externally, 1TB Seagate 7200RPM 2.5" HDD (ST1000LM049-2GH172) left outside Monitor: 1080p 126Hz IPS G-sync

 

Desktop benching:

Cinebench R15 Single thread:168 Multi-thread: 833 

SuperPi (v1.5 from Techpowerup, PI value output) 16K: 0.100s 1M: 8.255s 32M: 7m 45.93s

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Jurrunio said:

False. Ultra settings will need a 1080ti. A 1070 can only do this in high, possibly a mix of high and medium in most cases.

Actually no (maybe at 4K, but at 1440p it's really pulling it's weight). After fixing the problem my FPS never falls below 60, even when bumping up MSAA above the recommended levels.

 

Check out this review from 3D guru also getting around 70 fps in most games at ultra 1440p:

http://www.guru3d.com/articles-pages/msi-geforce-gtx-1070-gaming-x-review,1.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Aggravated Salmon said:

mhmm haha whenever i get a new system i immediately change the power option to high performance mode. (unless its a laptop)

Lessen learned! After this ordeal I would be very reluctant to even enable this on a laptop, unless you're really running low on battery. Lighroom was almost unusable slow, slower than the core 2 quad q8300 on the other system with an insufficient amount of ddr2 ram.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Spikkel said:

Actually no (maybe at 4K, but at 1440p it's really pulling it's weight). After fixing the problem my FPS never falls below 60, even when bumping up MSAA above the recommended levels.

 

Check out this review from 3D guru also getting around 70 fps in most games at ultra 1440p:

http://www.guru3d.com/articles-pages/msi-geforce-gtx-1070-gaming-x-review,1.html

3

Half of the game benchmark results are using very high settings, not ultra. Only Doom, Hitman 2016, Anno 2205, Fallout 4, GTA 5, Witcher 3 and Battlefield Hardline achieved that and they are either older games or just not punishing on the graphics card in the first place. Also, average frame rates doesnt really affect how I pick the settings, minimums do. If a game lets me run at 100fps average but 40fps at 1% minimum then I'd still use a lower graphical settings.

CPU: i7-2600K 4751MHz 1.44V (software) --> 1.47V at the back of the socket Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Extreme4 (BCLK: 103.3MHz) CPU Cooler: Noctua NH-D15 RAM: Adata XPG 2x8GB DDR3 (XMP: 2133MHz 10-11-11-30 CR2, custom: 2203MHz 10-11-10-26 CR1 tRFC:230 tREFI:14000) GPU: Asus GTX 1070 Dual (Super Jetstream vbios, +70(2025-2088MHz)/+400(8.8Gbps)) SSD: Samsung 840 Pro 256GB (main boot drive), Transcend SSD370 128GB PSU: Seasonic X-660 80+ Gold Case: Antec P110 Silent, 5 intakes 1 exhaust Monitor: AOC G2460PF 1080p 144Hz (150Hz max w/ DP, 121Hz max w/ HDMI) TN panel Keyboard: Logitech G610 Orion (Cherry MX Blue) with SteelSeries Apex M260 keycaps Mouse: BenQ Zowie FK1

 

Model: HP Omen 17 17-an110ca CPU: i7-8750H (0.125V core & cache, 50mV SA undervolt) GPU: GTX 1060 6GB Mobile (+80/+450, 1650MHz~1750MHz 0.78V~0.85V) RAM: 8+8GB DDR4-2400 18-17-17-39 2T Storage: HP EX920 1TB PCIe x4 M.2 SSD + Crucial MX500 1TB 2.5" SATA SSD, 128GB Toshiba PCIe x2 M.2 SSD (KBG30ZMV128G) gone cooking externally, 1TB Seagate 7200RPM 2.5" HDD (ST1000LM049-2GH172) left outside Monitor: 1080p 126Hz IPS G-sync

 

Desktop benching:

Cinebench R15 Single thread:168 Multi-thread: 833 

SuperPi (v1.5 from Techpowerup, PI value output) 16K: 0.100s 1M: 8.255s 32M: 7m 45.93s

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, Jurrunio said:

Half of the game benchmark results are using very high settings, not ultra. Only Doom, Hitman 2016, Anno 2205, Fallout 4, GTA 5, Witcher 3 and Battlefield Hardline achieved that and they are either older games or just not punishing on the graphics card in the first place. Also, average frame rates doesnt really affect how I pick the settings, minimums do. If a game lets me run at 100fps average but 40fps at 1% minimum then I'd still use a lower graphical settings.

I stand corrected. [Will edit the post] Though minimum FPS never dips below 60 on ultra (with higher than preset MSAA) with GTA V, Totalwar: Warhammer, and Tomb Raider a survivor is born. But, as you already noted, this is slightly older games

The point of this thread though is to assist others with under-performing GPUs. Prior to this fix I got an average of 30 FPS with 17 lows. The fix more than doubled average FPS and bumped minimums up to 60 in my use case. 

 

May I kindly ask that you (and others reading this) contribute other possible fixes to under-performing GPUs not yet mentioned. So others my benefit from this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Spikkel said:

May I kindly ask that you (and others reading this) contribute other possible fixes to under-performing GPUs not yet mentioned. So others my benefit from this.

Stupid fan profile

J6vZYb5.png

 

Forget about the drivers (sometimes games still start, while in most cases, they dont)

 

Also reinstalling the card. Sometimes the card just isnt fully seated, which leads to the card only getting PCIe x4 or even less speed.

 

 

CPU: i7-2600K 4751MHz 1.44V (software) --> 1.47V at the back of the socket Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Extreme4 (BCLK: 103.3MHz) CPU Cooler: Noctua NH-D15 RAM: Adata XPG 2x8GB DDR3 (XMP: 2133MHz 10-11-11-30 CR2, custom: 2203MHz 10-11-10-26 CR1 tRFC:230 tREFI:14000) GPU: Asus GTX 1070 Dual (Super Jetstream vbios, +70(2025-2088MHz)/+400(8.8Gbps)) SSD: Samsung 840 Pro 256GB (main boot drive), Transcend SSD370 128GB PSU: Seasonic X-660 80+ Gold Case: Antec P110 Silent, 5 intakes 1 exhaust Monitor: AOC G2460PF 1080p 144Hz (150Hz max w/ DP, 121Hz max w/ HDMI) TN panel Keyboard: Logitech G610 Orion (Cherry MX Blue) with SteelSeries Apex M260 keycaps Mouse: BenQ Zowie FK1

 

Model: HP Omen 17 17-an110ca CPU: i7-8750H (0.125V core & cache, 50mV SA undervolt) GPU: GTX 1060 6GB Mobile (+80/+450, 1650MHz~1750MHz 0.78V~0.85V) RAM: 8+8GB DDR4-2400 18-17-17-39 2T Storage: HP EX920 1TB PCIe x4 M.2 SSD + Crucial MX500 1TB 2.5" SATA SSD, 128GB Toshiba PCIe x2 M.2 SSD (KBG30ZMV128G) gone cooking externally, 1TB Seagate 7200RPM 2.5" HDD (ST1000LM049-2GH172) left outside Monitor: 1080p 126Hz IPS G-sync

 

Desktop benching:

Cinebench R15 Single thread:168 Multi-thread: 833 

SuperPi (v1.5 from Techpowerup, PI value output) 16K: 0.100s 1M: 8.255s 32M: 7m 45.93s

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×