Jump to content
Search In
  • More options...
Find results that contain...
Find results in...

Some one make a dual socket motherboard

Some one make a dual socket motherboard that can use intel and amd at the same time .. where one lags the other makes up for ..like the r7 and a i7 cpu .. just a Idea 

Link to post
Share on other sites

-moved to CPUs and motherboards section-

 

I think that would be basically impossible.

Solve your own audio issues  |  First Steps with RPi 3  |  Humidity & Condensation  |  Sleep & Hibernation  |  Overclocking RAM  |  Making Backups  |  Displays  |  4K / 8K / 16K / etc.  |  Do I need 80+ Platinum?

If you can read this you're using the wrong theme.  You can change it at the bottom.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Impossible. Intel and AMD processors used to be compatible back then, only because they share the same way of operation. They have changed so much since then compatibility is impossible.

CPU: i7-2600K 4751MHz 1.44V (software) --> 1.47V at the back of the socket Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Extreme4 (BCLK: 103.3MHz) CPU Cooler: Noctua NH-D15 RAM: Adata XPG 2x8GB DDR3 (XMP: 2133MHz 10-11-11-30 CR2, custom: 2203MHz 10-11-10-26 CR1 tRFC:230 tREFI:14000) GPU: Asus GTX 1070 Dual (Super Jetstream vbios, +70(2025-2088MHz)/+400(8.8Gbps)) SSD: Samsung 840 Pro 256GB (main boot drive), Transcend SSD370 128GB PSU: Seasonic X-660 80+ Gold Case: Antec P110 Silent, 5 intakes 1 exhaust Monitor: AOC G2460PF 1080p 144Hz (150Hz max w/ DP, 121Hz max w/ HDMI) TN panel Keyboard: Logitech G610 Orion (Cherry MX Blue) with SteelSeries Apex M260 keycaps Mouse: BenQ Zowie FK1

 

Model: HP Omen 17 17-an110ca CPU: i7-8750H (0.125V core & cache, 50mV SA undervolt) GPU: GTX 1060 6GB Mobile (+80/+450, 1650MHz~1750MHz 0.78V~0.85V) RAM: 8+8GB DDR4-2400 18-17-17-39 2T Storage: 1TB HP EX920 PCIe x4 M.2 SSD + 1TB Seagate 7200RPM 2.5" HDD (ST1000LM049-2GH172), 128GB Toshiba PCIe x2 M.2 SSD (KBG30ZMV128G) gone cooking externally Monitor: 1080p 126Hz IPS G-sync

 

Desktop benching:

Cinebench R15 Single thread:168 Multi-thread: 833 

SuperPi (v1.5 from Techpowerup, PI value output) 16K: 0.100s 1M: 8.255s 32M: 7m 45.93s

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yh ino but one can wish a company would try and see the out come ..if I could I would

Link to post
Share on other sites

While we're at it lets make a system that can SLI an AMD and Nvidia GPU using SLI fingers.

It's about on the same level of possibility.

Current Network Layout:

Current Build Log/PC:

Prior Build Log/PC:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Even if it were physically possible, neither Intel nor AMD would EVER do this. It would force their different architectures to compete on the same platform, which is just heresy as far as competition goes.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Lurick said:

While we're at it lets make a system that can SLI an AMD and Nvidia GPU using SLI fingers.

It's about on the same level of possibility.

IIRC they have technically done this with DirectX12 or Vulkan testing in some of the early Ashes of the Singularity benchmarks... but that was over the PCI Express bus and it was not sanctioned by either company. But it is at least to some degree feasible. Crossing the streams with CPUs is not.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, KemoKa said:

IIRC they have technically done this with DirectX12 or Vulkan testing in some of the early Ashes of the Singularity benchmarks... but that was over the PCI Express bus and it was not sanctioned by either company. But it is at least to some degree feasible. Crossing the streams with CPUs is not.

Yah, DX12 Multi-GPU I think is what it was called.

Current Network Layout:

Current Build Log/PC:

Prior Build Log/PC:

Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Iihron said:

Yh ino but one can wish a company would try and see the out come ..if I could I would

That's cramming parts from two motherboards into one, feasibility = 0. Might as well set up a server network that allows multiple computers to act as one.

CPU: i7-2600K 4751MHz 1.44V (software) --> 1.47V at the back of the socket Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Extreme4 (BCLK: 103.3MHz) CPU Cooler: Noctua NH-D15 RAM: Adata XPG 2x8GB DDR3 (XMP: 2133MHz 10-11-11-30 CR2, custom: 2203MHz 10-11-10-26 CR1 tRFC:230 tREFI:14000) GPU: Asus GTX 1070 Dual (Super Jetstream vbios, +70(2025-2088MHz)/+400(8.8Gbps)) SSD: Samsung 840 Pro 256GB (main boot drive), Transcend SSD370 128GB PSU: Seasonic X-660 80+ Gold Case: Antec P110 Silent, 5 intakes 1 exhaust Monitor: AOC G2460PF 1080p 144Hz (150Hz max w/ DP, 121Hz max w/ HDMI) TN panel Keyboard: Logitech G610 Orion (Cherry MX Blue) with SteelSeries Apex M260 keycaps Mouse: BenQ Zowie FK1

 

Model: HP Omen 17 17-an110ca CPU: i7-8750H (0.125V core & cache, 50mV SA undervolt) GPU: GTX 1060 6GB Mobile (+80/+450, 1650MHz~1750MHz 0.78V~0.85V) RAM: 8+8GB DDR4-2400 18-17-17-39 2T Storage: 1TB HP EX920 PCIe x4 M.2 SSD + 1TB Seagate 7200RPM 2.5" HDD (ST1000LM049-2GH172), 128GB Toshiba PCIe x2 M.2 SSD (KBG30ZMV128G) gone cooking externally Monitor: 1080p 126Hz IPS G-sync

 

Desktop benching:

Cinebench R15 Single thread:168 Multi-thread: 833 

SuperPi (v1.5 from Techpowerup, PI value output) 16K: 0.100s 1M: 8.255s 32M: 7m 45.93s

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Iihron said:

Why would it be so hard to do .. is it the programming 

 

It's the fact that CPUs based on the Core and Zen architectures are fundamentally different and require different electrical and computational components to accompany them. It's not as simple as software or programming, it's a matter of chipsets, of power delivery layouts, having to design an entire interconnect across which the CPUs to talk to one another, because you can't just have them operating separately and you can't use QPI or Infinity Fabric because one CPU won't support the other's interconnect. Then you've got the PCIe layouts to worry about, because those differ across platforms and with Intel, even across different lines of processors... I could go on, but hopefully this wall of text gives an idea why it would be not just impossible, but impractical even if it were possible.

tl;dr, for several dozen reasons, that's just not how it works

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Iihron said:

Why would it be so hard to do .. is it the programming 

 

There's many reasons ranging from business to technical, and of the many technical ones, architectural differences between the platforms and the CPUs themselves would probably be top of the list

Solve your own audio issues  |  First Steps with RPi 3  |  Humidity & Condensation  |  Sleep & Hibernation  |  Overclocking RAM  |  Making Backups  |  Displays  |  4K / 8K / 16K / etc.  |  Do I need 80+ Platinum?

If you can read this you're using the wrong theme.  You can change it at the bottom.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Impossible . Even on current tech , dual socket boards reauire both cpu's to be the same SKU AND arch . Never mind running two different cpus from 2 different brands running 2 different µarchs...

AMD Ryzen 7 3.8ghz at 1.3V Corsair vengeance LPX 8GB 2800mhz @ 3200mhz CAS 16 + 2*4GB micron ballistics @ 3200mhz cas 16 ;Gigabyte ga-ab350-Gaming 3; cooler master nepton 240M ; CF r9 290x tri x + r9 290 tri x ; CX750M PSU ; SPEC 03 case with 9 120mm fans ; windows 10 64 bit 

Link to post
Share on other sites

There was this one time,

 ecspf88_SIMAa9s_both.jpg.3352e9300adbc091580073eb1fff3e45.jpg

 

But it was sort of a disaster and more of 2 motherboards being glued together.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×