1070 Not preforming as it should?

[JTB7]

I have had some things with my card, not preforming as well as I think it should, for example battlefield one at 1080-scaled 200%(1440p right) is only getting me 35-45 fps.  Coult there be a bottleneck?  I have a i5 6500, and 8gb of ram.  I have had similar issues with some other games.  Could it be that I am on a hard drive and not solid state?  I am thinking about doing a full reset on my pc, because it has been about a year since I built it, would that help?  I only have games stored on hear, so I wouldn't lose anything important.  

[Slottr]

I believe BF1 is very CPU intensive. So that's probably it.

[Mira Yurizaki]

Most likely it's the CPU. Storage has nothing to do with performance other than loading.

[SeanAngelo]

12 minutes ago, JTB7 said:

I have had some things with my card, not preforming as well as I think it should, for example battlefield one at 1080-scaled 200%(1440p right) is only getting me 35-45 fps.  Coult there be a bottleneck?  I have a i5 6500, and 8gb of ram.  I have had similar issues with some other games.  Could it be that I am on a hard drive and not solid state?  I am thinking about doing a full reset on my pc, because it has been about a year since I built it, would that help?  I only have games stored on hear, so I wouldn't lose anything important.  

its your cpu.

[ARikozuM]

You need more than 8GB of RAM for BF1. I'm seeing usage around 7GB when playing most of the maps.

[Energycore]

You should test framerates at 1080p without upscaling, and other ones.

 

200% upscaling on 1080p is actually about 2715 x 1527, so a bit bigger than 1440p. And look at BF1 numbers for the 1070 in 1440p:

 

Still, any 1070 manages 80-90 fps in 1440p, so look for thermal throttling.

 

(reference your numbers from here https://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/MSI/GTX_1070_Quick_Silver_OC/8.html)

 

Maybe you did tho upscaling in such a way that it's actually upscaling to 400% which is 4K, if you take a look, your framerate numbers make sense for that res.

[AlTech]

28 minutes ago, JTB7 said:

I have had some things with my card, not preforming as well as I think it should, for example battlefield one at 1080-scaled 200%(1440p right) is only getting me 35-45 fps.  Coult there be a bottleneck?  I have a i5 6500, and 8gb of ram.  I have had similar issues with some other games.  Could it be that I am on a hard drive and not solid state?  I am thinking about doing a full reset on my pc, because it has been about a year since I built it, would that help?  I only have games stored on hear, so I wouldn't lose anything important.  

Why do you have 8GB RAM with a GTX 1070? You should have bought 16GB. And why do you have an i5-6500? You should have paired it with an i7-6700.

[JTB7]

43 minutes ago, Energycore said:

You should test framerates at 1080p without upscaling, and other ones.

 

200% upscaling on 1080p is actually about 2715 x 1527, so a bit bigger than 1440p. And look at BF1 numbers for the 1070 in 1440p:

 

Still, any 1070 manages 80-90 fps in 1440p, so look for thermal throttling.

 

(reference your numbers from here https://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/MSI/GTX_1070_Quick_Silver_OC/8.html)

 

Maybe you did tho upscaling in such a way that it's actually upscaling to 400% which is 4K, if you take a look, your framerate numbers make sense for that res.

What are your pc specs?

 

Ignore that, I re read and thought it said that YOU had a 1070

[Energycore]

14 minutes ago, JTB7 said:

What are your pc specs?

What do they have to do with this?

[GTBTK]

42% scaling is native screen resolution in BF1. 

[i_build_nanosuits]

3 hours ago, JTB7 said:

I have had some things with my card, not preforming as well as I think it should, for example battlefield one at 1080-scaled 200%(1440p right) is only getting me 35-45 fps.  Coult there be a bottleneck?  I have a i5 6500, and 8gb of ram.  I have had similar issues with some other games.  Could it be that I am on a hard drive and not solid state?  I am thinking about doing a full reset on my pc, because it has been about a year since I built it, would that help?  I only have games stored on hear, so I wouldn't lose anything important.  

1080P SCALED 200% IS 4K BRO...

[i_build_nanosuits]

4 minutes ago, GTBTK said:

42% scaling is native screen resolution in BF1. 

it's 100% now...42% was in the beta.

[ivan134]

Did no one read that part where he said 200% scaling?

[ivan134]

2 minutes ago, i_build_nanosuits said:

it's 100% now...42% was in the beta.

Good thing they fixed that. That shit was dumb in the beta. Really random.

[GTBTK]

4 minutes ago, ivan134 said:

Did no one read that part where he said 200% scaling?

I didn't know that they changed it to a more sensible 100%. But yes I did read that he said 200%. That is why I mentioned what I thought was native scaling

[i_build_nanosuits]

1 minute ago, GTBTK said:

I didn't know that they changed it. But yes I did read that he said 200%. That is why I mentioned what I thought was native scaling

native is 100% which is 1920x1080 OP is rendering at 200% so they do twice the vertical and twice the horizontal lines so this makes it 3840x2160 which is 4K...that"s why he is rendering at 40FPS on a GTX 1070.

[GTBTK]

11 minutes ago, i_build_nanosuits said:

native is 100% which is 1920x1080 OP is rendering at 200% so they do twice the vertical and twice the horizontal lines so this makes it 3840x2160 which is 4K...that"s why he is rendering at 40FPS on a GTX 1070.

yes I know. that is why I pointed out the native resolution setting. a 1070 is never going to make lots of FPS at 4K

[i_build_nanosuits]

1 minute ago, GTBTK said:

yes I know. that is why I pointed out the native resolution setting. a 1070 is never going to make lots of FPS at 4K

best settings for 1080p and GTX 1070 would probably be all ultra settings with 120 or 130% scalling somewhere in there.

[GTBTK]

1 minute ago, i_build_nanosuits said:

best settings for 1080p and GTX 1070 would probably be all ultra settings with 120 or 130% scalling somewhere in there.

with a 60hz monitor you are probably right

[i_build_nanosuits]

1 minute ago, GTBTK said:

with a 60hz monitor you are probably right

yes...if the monitor is 120hz or more then i would leave scalling to 100%...maybe 105% if the CPU is holding back a bit or something..