Jump to content

Worth for gaming loading times? Compatible?

Balokun

I wanna get myself a new SSD for gaming, faster loading times and performance. Is it worth it?

Samsung
 256GB 950 PRO SSD, M.2, NVMe, 2200/900 MB/s 

Also is it compatible with this motherboard?


 

Asus Z170i PRO GAMING, LGA1151, Intel Z170, DDR4, mITX

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

As a person who went from a Hard Drive to an SSD. Game load times didn't really change a lot. It's negligible. Overall system responsiveness is what changed.

Archangel (Desktop) CPU: i5 4590 GPU:Asus R9 280  3GB RAM:HyperX Beast 2x4GBPSU:SeaSonic S12G 750W Mobo:GA-H97m-HD3 Case:CM Silencio 650 Storage:1 TB WD Red
Celestial (Laptop 1) CPU:i7 4720HQ GPU:GTX 860M 4GB RAM:2x4GB SK Hynix DDR3Storage: 250GB 850 EVO Model:Lenovo Y50-70
Seraph (Laptop 2) CPU:i7 6700HQ GPU:GTX 970M 3GB RAM:2x8GB DDR4Storage: 256GB Samsung 951 + 1TB Toshiba HDD Model:Asus GL502VT

Windows 10 is now MSX! - http://linustechtips.com/main/topic/440190-can-we-start-calling-windows-10/page-6

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Load times for games can change from a LOT to a LITTLE, but if you don't have an SSD for your OS, buy one for your OS and have some space left over for certain games that it would work better with.

Diamond 5 in League :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

It can improve, maybe around 10-20 seconds less, depending on the change and how speedy the SSD is. But yeah, the SSD should have the system embedded onto it, to maximize speed potential, otherwise it has to go get the game to the other drive and that would impact load times i presume negatively.

Groomlake Authority

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, don_svetlio said:

As a person who went from a Hard Drive to an SSD. Game load times didn't really change a lot. It's negligible. Overall system responsiveness is what changed.

As a person who went from a Hard Drive to an SSD. Game load times seemed to half in almost everything I play. Open world games benefit from it the most.

Needs money for car parts :P

 

System specs: Core i7 9700k, Dark Rock Pro 4 , MSI Z390 PRO, 16GB CORSAIR VENGENCE DDR4 3000, EVGA GTX 1070 FTW, Corsair AX860, Seagate 1TB, Sandisk 240GB SSD, Corsair 400c

 

My Steam Profile (from SteamDB)

 

  • Worth: £654 (£221 with sales)
  • Games owned: 62
  • Games played: 52 (83%)
  • Hours on record: 2,980.7h

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, iDeFecZx said:

As a person who went from a Hard Drive to an SSD. Game load times seemed to half in almost everything I play. Open world games benefit from it the most.

I'll measure it if you want but I haven't noticed a difference in almost any game.

Archangel (Desktop) CPU: i5 4590 GPU:Asus R9 280  3GB RAM:HyperX Beast 2x4GBPSU:SeaSonic S12G 750W Mobo:GA-H97m-HD3 Case:CM Silencio 650 Storage:1 TB WD Red
Celestial (Laptop 1) CPU:i7 4720HQ GPU:GTX 860M 4GB RAM:2x4GB SK Hynix DDR3Storage: 250GB 850 EVO Model:Lenovo Y50-70
Seraph (Laptop 2) CPU:i7 6700HQ GPU:GTX 970M 3GB RAM:2x8GB DDR4Storage: 256GB Samsung 951 + 1TB Toshiba HDD Model:Asus GL502VT

Windows 10 is now MSX! - http://linustechtips.com/main/topic/440190-can-we-start-calling-windows-10/page-6

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, don_svetlio said:

I'll measure it if you want but I haven't noticed a difference in almost any game.

 

Needs money for car parts :P

 

System specs: Core i7 9700k, Dark Rock Pro 4 , MSI Z390 PRO, 16GB CORSAIR VENGENCE DDR4 3000, EVGA GTX 1070 FTW, Corsair AX860, Seagate 1TB, Sandisk 240GB SSD, Corsair 400c

 

My Steam Profile (from SteamDB)

 

  • Worth: £654 (£221 with sales)
  • Games owned: 62
  • Games played: 52 (83%)
  • Hours on record: 2,980.7h

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thing is: Im having an EVO SSD for my Win10 OS already. THat´s cool and all, I was just wondering if it would help if f.e. Battlefield, or any bigger loading game would come from an NVMe SSD

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Balokun said:

Thing is: Im having an EVO SSD for my Win10 OS already. THat´s cool and all, I was just wondering if it would help if f.e. Battlefield, or any bigger loading game would come from an NVMe SSD

 

Not really. The difference between a SATA 3 SSD and an NVMe SSD is even harder to notice.

 

2 minutes ago, iDeFecZx said:

 

Not like that for me.

Archangel (Desktop) CPU: i5 4590 GPU:Asus R9 280  3GB RAM:HyperX Beast 2x4GBPSU:SeaSonic S12G 750W Mobo:GA-H97m-HD3 Case:CM Silencio 650 Storage:1 TB WD Red
Celestial (Laptop 1) CPU:i7 4720HQ GPU:GTX 860M 4GB RAM:2x4GB SK Hynix DDR3Storage: 250GB 850 EVO Model:Lenovo Y50-70
Seraph (Laptop 2) CPU:i7 6700HQ GPU:GTX 970M 3GB RAM:2x8GB DDR4Storage: 256GB Samsung 951 + 1TB Toshiba HDD Model:Asus GL502VT

Windows 10 is now MSX! - http://linustechtips.com/main/topic/440190-can-we-start-calling-windows-10/page-6

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, don_svetlio said:

Not really. The difference between a SATA 3 SSD and an NVMe SSD is even harder to notice.

 

Not like that for me.

This video also supports my point.

Every game loads faster on the SSD, its just more noticeable with some than others.

Needs money for car parts :P

 

System specs: Core i7 9700k, Dark Rock Pro 4 , MSI Z390 PRO, 16GB CORSAIR VENGENCE DDR4 3000, EVGA GTX 1070 FTW, Corsair AX860, Seagate 1TB, Sandisk 240GB SSD, Corsair 400c

 

My Steam Profile (from SteamDB)

 

  • Worth: £654 (£221 with sales)
  • Games owned: 62
  • Games played: 52 (83%)
  • Hours on record: 2,980.7h

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, iDeFecZx said:

This video also supports my point.

Every game loads faster on the SSD, its just more noticeable with some than others.

If you're using a 5400RPM drive vs an 850 Pro sure. It's easy to notice. but if you compare a more recent 7200 or 10 000 RPM drive to an average SSD then the difference is not really noticeable in games.

Archangel (Desktop) CPU: i5 4590 GPU:Asus R9 280  3GB RAM:HyperX Beast 2x4GBPSU:SeaSonic S12G 750W Mobo:GA-H97m-HD3 Case:CM Silencio 650 Storage:1 TB WD Red
Celestial (Laptop 1) CPU:i7 4720HQ GPU:GTX 860M 4GB RAM:2x4GB SK Hynix DDR3Storage: 250GB 850 EVO Model:Lenovo Y50-70
Seraph (Laptop 2) CPU:i7 6700HQ GPU:GTX 970M 3GB RAM:2x8GB DDR4Storage: 256GB Samsung 951 + 1TB Toshiba HDD Model:Asus GL502VT

Windows 10 is now MSX! - http://linustechtips.com/main/topic/440190-can-we-start-calling-windows-10/page-6

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, don_svetlio said:

If you're using a 5400RPM drive vs an 850 Pro sure. It's easy to notice. but if you compare a more recent 7200 or 10 000 RPM drive to an average SSD then the difference is not really noticeable in games.

'SSD vs HDD 7200RPM'

It literally says in the title.

Needs money for car parts :P

 

System specs: Core i7 9700k, Dark Rock Pro 4 , MSI Z390 PRO, 16GB CORSAIR VENGENCE DDR4 3000, EVGA GTX 1070 FTW, Corsair AX860, Seagate 1TB, Sandisk 240GB SSD, Corsair 400c

 

My Steam Profile (from SteamDB)

 

  • Worth: £654 (£221 with sales)
  • Games owned: 62
  • Games played: 52 (83%)
  • Hours on record: 2,980.7h

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, iDeFecZx said:

'SSD vs HDD 7200RPM'

It literally says in the title.

Yeah, I call major bull on that video. Sorry but even my 5400RPM drive loads faster than the "7200 RPM" one. I'll record it and show you as soon as my GPU is back.

Archangel (Desktop) CPU: i5 4590 GPU:Asus R9 280  3GB RAM:HyperX Beast 2x4GBPSU:SeaSonic S12G 750W Mobo:GA-H97m-HD3 Case:CM Silencio 650 Storage:1 TB WD Red
Celestial (Laptop 1) CPU:i7 4720HQ GPU:GTX 860M 4GB RAM:2x4GB SK Hynix DDR3Storage: 250GB 850 EVO Model:Lenovo Y50-70
Seraph (Laptop 2) CPU:i7 6700HQ GPU:GTX 970M 3GB RAM:2x8GB DDR4Storage: 256GB Samsung 951 + 1TB Toshiba HDD Model:Asus GL502VT

Windows 10 is now MSX! - http://linustechtips.com/main/topic/440190-can-we-start-calling-windows-10/page-6

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, don_svetlio said:

Yeah, I call major bull on that video. Sorry but even my 5400RPM drive loads faster than the "7200 RPM" one. I'll record it and show you as soon as my GPU is back.

How can you not notice a difference? Either you have a dodgy SSD, or are dopey AF

Needs money for car parts :P

 

System specs: Core i7 9700k, Dark Rock Pro 4 , MSI Z390 PRO, 16GB CORSAIR VENGENCE DDR4 3000, EVGA GTX 1070 FTW, Corsair AX860, Seagate 1TB, Sandisk 240GB SSD, Corsair 400c

 

My Steam Profile (from SteamDB)

 

  • Worth: £654 (£221 with sales)
  • Games owned: 62
  • Games played: 52 (83%)
  • Hours on record: 2,980.7h

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

I tried Battlefield 4 on my own , running it from an HDD and it took 4,34 mins o load shanghai...
The SDD took about a minute....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Balokun said:

I tried Battlefield 4 on my own , running it from an HDD and it took 4,34 mins o load shanghai...
The SDD took about a minute....

Exactly, GTA 5 for me takes around 30 ish seconds on my SSD. On my HDD it took over a minute

Needs money for car parts :P

 

System specs: Core i7 9700k, Dark Rock Pro 4 , MSI Z390 PRO, 16GB CORSAIR VENGENCE DDR4 3000, EVGA GTX 1070 FTW, Corsair AX860, Seagate 1TB, Sandisk 240GB SSD, Corsair 400c

 

My Steam Profile (from SteamDB)

 

  • Worth: £654 (£221 with sales)
  • Games owned: 62
  • Games played: 52 (83%)
  • Hours on record: 2,980.7h

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, iDeFecZx said:

How can you not notice a difference? Either you have a dodgy SSD, or are dopey AF

Ooor I keep my OS clean and don't install random crap? And keep everything defragged.

Archangel (Desktop) CPU: i5 4590 GPU:Asus R9 280  3GB RAM:HyperX Beast 2x4GBPSU:SeaSonic S12G 750W Mobo:GA-H97m-HD3 Case:CM Silencio 650 Storage:1 TB WD Red
Celestial (Laptop 1) CPU:i7 4720HQ GPU:GTX 860M 4GB RAM:2x4GB SK Hynix DDR3Storage: 250GB 850 EVO Model:Lenovo Y50-70
Seraph (Laptop 2) CPU:i7 6700HQ GPU:GTX 970M 3GB RAM:2x8GB DDR4Storage: 256GB Samsung 951 + 1TB Toshiba HDD Model:Asus GL502VT

Windows 10 is now MSX! - http://linustechtips.com/main/topic/440190-can-we-start-calling-windows-10/page-6

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, iDeFecZx said:

Exactly, GTA 5 for me takes around 30 ish seconds on my SSD. On my HDD it took over a minute

 

Archangel (Desktop) CPU: i5 4590 GPU:Asus R9 280  3GB RAM:HyperX Beast 2x4GBPSU:SeaSonic S12G 750W Mobo:GA-H97m-HD3 Case:CM Silencio 650 Storage:1 TB WD Red
Celestial (Laptop 1) CPU:i7 4720HQ GPU:GTX 860M 4GB RAM:2x4GB SK Hynix DDR3Storage: 250GB 850 EVO Model:Lenovo Y50-70
Seraph (Laptop 2) CPU:i7 6700HQ GPU:GTX 970M 3GB RAM:2x8GB DDR4Storage: 256GB Samsung 951 + 1TB Toshiba HDD Model:Asus GL502VT

Windows 10 is now MSX! - http://linustechtips.com/main/topic/440190-can-we-start-calling-windows-10/page-6

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, don_svetlio said:

Ooor I keep my OS clean and don't install random crap? And keep everything defragged.

SSD's are proven to be way faster. So unless you're using an older SATA connection, load times will benefit from it

Needs money for car parts :P

 

System specs: Core i7 9700k, Dark Rock Pro 4 , MSI Z390 PRO, 16GB CORSAIR VENGENCE DDR4 3000, EVGA GTX 1070 FTW, Corsair AX860, Seagate 1TB, Sandisk 240GB SSD, Corsair 400c

 

My Steam Profile (from SteamDB)

 

  • Worth: £654 (£221 with sales)
  • Games owned: 62
  • Games played: 52 (83%)
  • Hours on record: 2,980.7h

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, iDeFecZx said:

SSD's are proven to be way faster. So unless you're using an older SATA connection, load times will benefit from it

BUT - games don't scale linearly as the OS and it HEAVILY depends on WHERE on the drive your game is. Watch the video

Archangel (Desktop) CPU: i5 4590 GPU:Asus R9 280  3GB RAM:HyperX Beast 2x4GBPSU:SeaSonic S12G 750W Mobo:GA-H97m-HD3 Case:CM Silencio 650 Storage:1 TB WD Red
Celestial (Laptop 1) CPU:i7 4720HQ GPU:GTX 860M 4GB RAM:2x4GB SK Hynix DDR3Storage: 250GB 850 EVO Model:Lenovo Y50-70
Seraph (Laptop 2) CPU:i7 6700HQ GPU:GTX 970M 3GB RAM:2x8GB DDR4Storage: 256GB Samsung 951 + 1TB Toshiba HDD Model:Asus GL502VT

Windows 10 is now MSX! - http://linustechtips.com/main/topic/440190-can-we-start-calling-windows-10/page-6

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, don_svetlio said:

 

Its still not going to be as fast as an SSD.

Needs money for car parts :P

 

System specs: Core i7 9700k, Dark Rock Pro 4 , MSI Z390 PRO, 16GB CORSAIR VENGENCE DDR4 3000, EVGA GTX 1070 FTW, Corsair AX860, Seagate 1TB, Sandisk 240GB SSD, Corsair 400c

 

My Steam Profile (from SteamDB)

 

  • Worth: £654 (£221 with sales)
  • Games owned: 62
  • Games played: 52 (83%)
  • Hours on record: 2,980.7h

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, don_svetlio said:

BUT - games don't scale linearly as the OS and it HEAVILY depends on WHERE on the drive your game is. Watch the video

Both my OS and game are on my SSD. Neither are partitioned as far as im aware. The video's I linked support my claim. 

Needs money for car parts :P

 

System specs: Core i7 9700k, Dark Rock Pro 4 , MSI Z390 PRO, 16GB CORSAIR VENGENCE DDR4 3000, EVGA GTX 1070 FTW, Corsair AX860, Seagate 1TB, Sandisk 240GB SSD, Corsair 400c

 

My Steam Profile (from SteamDB)

 

  • Worth: £654 (£221 with sales)
  • Games owned: 62
  • Games played: 52 (83%)
  • Hours on record: 2,980.7h

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, iDeFecZx said:

Both my OS and game are on my SSD. Neither are partitioned as far as im aware. The video's I linked support my claim. 

SSD should NOT be partitioned. That only applies to HDDs.

 

1 minute ago, iDeFecZx said:

Its still not going to be as fast as an SSD.

I never claimed otherwise. What I said is games won't benefit as much as you might think. Which is true.

Archangel (Desktop) CPU: i5 4590 GPU:Asus R9 280  3GB RAM:HyperX Beast 2x4GBPSU:SeaSonic S12G 750W Mobo:GA-H97m-HD3 Case:CM Silencio 650 Storage:1 TB WD Red
Celestial (Laptop 1) CPU:i7 4720HQ GPU:GTX 860M 4GB RAM:2x4GB SK Hynix DDR3Storage: 250GB 850 EVO Model:Lenovo Y50-70
Seraph (Laptop 2) CPU:i7 6700HQ GPU:GTX 970M 3GB RAM:2x8GB DDR4Storage: 256GB Samsung 951 + 1TB Toshiba HDD Model:Asus GL502VT

Windows 10 is now MSX! - http://linustechtips.com/main/topic/440190-can-we-start-calling-windows-10/page-6

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, don_svetlio said:

SSD should NOT be partitioned. That only applies to HDDs.

 

I never claimed otherwise. What I said is games won't benefit as much as you might think. Which is true.

Not every game will, as I said, open world games do significantly, which is what I said.

I also said that EVERY game loaded faster on the SSD, which they do, even if its only a second or two

Needs money for car parts :P

 

System specs: Core i7 9700k, Dark Rock Pro 4 , MSI Z390 PRO, 16GB CORSAIR VENGENCE DDR4 3000, EVGA GTX 1070 FTW, Corsair AX860, Seagate 1TB, Sandisk 240GB SSD, Corsair 400c

 

My Steam Profile (from SteamDB)

 

  • Worth: £654 (£221 with sales)
  • Games owned: 62
  • Games played: 52 (83%)
  • Hours on record: 2,980.7h

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×