Jump to content

Post your Cinebench R20+15+R11.5+2003 Scores **Don't Read The OP PLZ**

Message added by SansVarnic

Please <SNIP> large quotes.

 

Save an Electron . . . <snip> always.

 

New CB 2024 cannot detect my GPU. But I'm very happy with my score. :old-tongue:

Iwin!.thumb.png.812a654425f2d387414d475e00352154.png

Intel Xeon E5 1650 v3 @ 3.5GHz 6C:12T / CM212 Evo / Asus X99 Deluxe / 16GB (4x4GB) DDR4 3000 Trident-Z / Samsung 850 Pro 256GB / Intel 335 240GB / WD Red 2 & 3TB / Antec 850w / RTX 2070 / Win10 Pro x64

HP Envy X360 15: Intel Core i5 8250U @ 1.6GHz 4C:8T / 8GB DDR4 / Intel UHD620 + Nvidia GeForce MX150 4GB / Intel 120GB SSD / Win10 Pro x64

 

HP Envy x360 BP series Intel 8th gen

AMD ThreadRipper 2!

5820K & 6800K 3-way SLI mobo support list

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hey. I’m testing my New pc build and was wondering if everything seems normal.

 

im running a 78003xd with default ram speed of 4800mhz (not running expo settings yet).

 

I’m getting a score of 1020-1050 with a max temp of 76 degrees C

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

old screen shot, my cpu cooler is not that good for me to go beyond 4.5GHz

image.png.75b1d571bbb50eebfc539d62290e0d5a.png

i don't remember if ram was 1600mt/s CL9-9-9-24 1T or 2400mt/s CL10-12-12-31 2T

 

found those aswell on my CB R15

image.png.921ddb4e69859b27568d775c2fb31d0c.png

 

maybe at 5Ghz fx would go to 790-800cb

 

but as you go up the efficiency disapears D

for example from 4.0 -> 4.4GHz +25W for 65cb Vs 4.4 -> 4.5GHz +23W for 16cb

and from 4.5 -> 4.7 = +58W for +34cb

 

those are really old data im not sure if they are 100% accurate... but i can imagine how crazy the power consumption will get above 4.7ghz

as for those who post with win7... i think its cheating 😛 i remember getting little better scores with win7.

 

BTW best way to Run Cinebench is by going to task manager -> cinebench right click and go to details -> set priority realtime.

and your score will be little more consistent i guess, the only downside is that you don't see the render progress but whatever

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

image.png.108523e6fe3272780f2a4c9abec2f0ee.png

i run the test today just to see and i have no idea why it score little worse, i was getting 723cb multi and 107cb single usually.

 

RAM is running at 1200MHz(2400MT/s) with CL10-12-12-31 2T 1.65v

CPU/NB and HT-Link at 2400MHz

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


×