Jump to content

Rendering with GPU

Matias_Chambers

Does rendering with a GPU change the quality of the video at all compared to rendering with a CPU? It just seems like so many people use their CPU to render, but GPU's are much faster at rendering depending on your GPU.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

It should not change the quality, as long as you do not change the settings of the render :)

Want any Graphic design or Motion design? Hit me up via the Site, or adding me on skype @ NyxeonFX

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Rendering I do not know, but encoding, there is a difference from what I read. There is GPU that can encode h265, they execute the task faster than CPU, using hardware encoder, but the final quality is lower, so CPU with software encoding would be longer, but of higher quality (better file size to quality ratio).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Matias_Chambers said:

Does rendering with a GPU change the quality of the video at all compared to rendering with a CPU? It just seems like so many people use their CPU to render, but GPU's are much faster at rendering depending on your GPU.

What program? nvec/quick sync is much worse than cpu.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Alice in game said:

Rendering I do not know, but encoding, there is a difference from what I read. There is GPU that can encode h265, they execute the task faster than CPU, using hardware encoder, but the final quality is lower, so CPU with software encoding would be longer, but of higher quality (better file size to quality ratio).

Rendering is the same as encoding isn't it? I mean like rendering/encoding a video when I am don't editing it in Sony Vegas

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Electronics Wizardy said:

What program? nvec/quick sync is much worse than cpu.

Sony Vegas

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Electronics Wizardy said:

What program? nvec/quick sync is much worse than cpu.

And I have an AMD R9 390. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Matias_Chambers said:

Sony Vegas

H264 is/should always be don't on cpu. Only effects are scaling are done on gpu.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Electronics Wizardy said:

H264 is/should always be don't on cpu. Only effects are scaling are done on gpu.

don't? or do you mean done?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Matias_Chambers said:

Rendering is the same as encoding isn't it? I mean like rendering/encoding a video when I am don't editing it in Sony Vegas

Technically, not exactly. En to go further, I would say that I used the wrong expression as I was looking about information regarding video transcoding.

 

Read this for difference between thes words: http://wolfcrow.com/blog/the-difference-between-encoding-transcoding-and-rendering/

 

And this article on transcoding on CPU using handbrake vs using GNU NVENC encoder (and the second page for result : http://www.techspot.com/article/1131-hevc-h256-enconding-playback/page5.html

So in other words, GPU encoding in h265 get worst result than CPU in h264, and CPU h265 always beat the h264.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×