Jump to content

Does this video tell the truth?

The Dragon

I just watched this video and it just doesn't seem true. Is this actually how it works? I thought it was all satellites and crap.

 

 

CPU: some amd thing Motherboard: its black RAM: its memory thats for sure GPU: r7 260x Case: corsair spec 01 Storage: 1tb of it PSU: 430w, so many watts

Display: its asus Cooling: fans Keyboard: logitech g710+ #browns4lyfe Mouse: its a logitech Sound: its what you hear Operating System: winders  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yah it is true, satellites have a crap ton of latency. We are always laying new cables too for lower latency and upgrading the backbone infrastructure. There isn't just one cable though but tons of them.

Current Network Layout:

Current Build Log/PC:

Prior Build Log/PC:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

imagine the length of those cables... damn

"Sulit" (adj.) something that is worth it

i7 8700K 4.8Ghz delidded / Corsair H100i V2 / Asus Strix Z370-F / G.Skill Trident Z RGB 16GB 3200 / EVGA GTX 1080Ti FTW3 / ASUS ROG SWIFT PG279Q

Samsung 850 EVO 500GB & 250GB - Crucial MX300 M.2 525GB / Fractal Design Define S / Corsair K70 MX Reds / Logitech G502 / Beyerdynamic DT770 250Ohm

SMSL SD793II AMP/DAC - Schiit Magni 3 / PCPP

Old Rig

i5 2500k 4.5Ghz | Gigabyte Z68XP-UD3P | Zotac GTX 980 AMP! Extreme | Crucial Ballistix Tactical 16GB 1866MHz

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

everytime I hear someone mentioning "the cloud" I want to punch him in the throat - "the cloud" does not exist; it's a made up term to aggregate / amalgamate all the stuff the average joe doesn't understand or can't be bothered to

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes it's true. Due to the very limited free bandwith in the air, a wireless transfer of massive amount of data is nearly impossible, Not to meantion the latency and the cost to get the satelite into the orbit.

Mineral oil and 40 kg aluminium heat sinks are a perfect combination: 73 cores and a Titan X, Twenty Thousand Leagues Under the Oil

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Most of "the internet" is fibre. Even if you're on copper, satellite or mobile everything up to that last point is fibre. Mobile towers are generally connected via fibre, satellite base stations are usually connected via fibre, the exchange or node on a copper network is connected via fibre.

 

Why? Because fibre is stable, high bandwidth and cheap. If you're connecting two permanent locations and there's no existing infrastructure? Fibre is the first opinion.

Fools think they know everything, experts know they know nothing

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, skywake said:

Most of "the internet" is fibre. Even if you're on copper, satellite or mobile everything up to that last point is fibre. Mobile towers are generally connected via fibre, satellite base stations are usually connected via fibre, the exchange or node on a copper network is connected via fibre.

 

Why? Because fibre is stable, high bandwidth and cheap. If you're connecting two permanent locations and there's no existing infrastructure? Fibre is the first opinion.

You forgot to mention distance. Fiber can extend much further than copper and maintain high speeds.

 

As for the underground cables, there was an awesome episode of "Mighty Ships" that was posted online (and now removed) that followed a ship called the Resolute while it laid underwater fiber for Costa Rica to get them connected to the US and Panama.

-KuJoe

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, zMeul said:

 

everytime I hear someone mentioning "the cloud" I want to punch him in the throat - "the cloud" does not exist; it's a made up term to aggregate / amalgamate all the stuff the average joe doesn't understand or can't be bothered to

That's why I bought some of these:


d35d044064acefa30f838e39cff7e6c1.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Windspeed36 said:

d35d044064acefa30f838e39cff7e6c1.jpg

it's especially infuriating when tech engineers use it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, zMeul said:

it's especially infuriating when tech engineers use it

I know, I hate when people use jargon that everybody else understands. :(

-KuJoe

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, KuJoe said:

I know, I hate when people use jargon that everybody else understands. :(

they  "understand" exactly shit - go on the street and ask anyone to explain what "the cloud" is

that term was invented to exactly put under the same umbrella a lot of network and internet services

 

it's a term for idiots, ignorants and tech illiterate people

and the funny part is: IT businesses selling "cloud services" to other businesses 

 

it's a fucking server farm somewhere in a bunker, deep underground in a undisclosed location

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, zMeul said:

they  "understand" exactly shit - go on the street and ask anyone to explain what "the cloud" is

that term was invented to exactly put under the same umbrella a lot of network and internet services

 

it's a term for idiots, ignorants and tech illiterate people

and the funny part is: IT businesses selling "cloud services" to other businesses 

 

it's a fucking server farm somewhere in a bunker, deep underground in a undisclosed location

I envy you if you get so upset over something so trivial. It can be argued about until the end of time and it doesn't matter at all. Call it what you want, it doesn't impact anybody else at the end of the day. The term "cloud" is used to describe an abstract idea so it can't be wrong or right. The word "cloud" has been used long before marketing people got a hold of it.

 

EDIT: The people who understand the word "cloud" are the people signing the paychecks. If somebody wants to pay you six figures to be their "cloud engineer" and setup their ESXi hosts then are you going to care what they call you?

-KuJoe

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, KuJoe said:

I envy you if you get so upset over something so trivial. It can be argued about until the end of time and it doesn't matter at all. Call it what you want, it doesn't impact anybody else at the end of the day. The term "cloud" is used to describe an abstract idea so it can't be wrong or right. The word "cloud" has been used long before marketing people got a hold of it.

yes I am upset because people in the IT tech industry fell victims of ignorance

 

this is how lot of terms with deep roots in technology have been used to describe the wrong thing - calling the video card the GPU and other BS like that; other example: scripting is not computer programming

 

 

take the OP here, he thought the internet is a bunch of wireless services - when it fact it something else entirely

 

---

 

Ignorance breeds monsters to fill up the vacancies of the soul that are unoccupied by the verities of knowledge - Horace Mann

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, KuJoe said:

You forgot to mention distance. Fiber can extend much further than copper and maintain high speeds.

 

As for the underground cables, there was an awesome episode of "Mighty Ships" that was posted online (and now removed) that followed a ship called the Resolute while it laid underwater fiber for Costa Rica to get them connected to the US and Panama.

The under water fibre cables also have inline optical repeaters or amplifiers. Not sure how many repeater vs amplifier cables there are, or if any are amplifier based at all. Most cables have been in place for a very long time and repeaters were the only workable solution at the time.

 

http://ezinearticles.com/?What-Are-Optical-Fiber-Amplifiers-And-How-Do-They-Work?&id=1160621

 

The repeaters are powered by the fibre cable using a high voltage layer in the cable makeup and the sea water is used as return.

 

The Southern Cross Cable for New Zealand and Australia is actually very openly documented and has some good information on how it works.

 

Quote

The network is almost 30,500 km in length, including 28,900km of submarine cable incorporating around 500 optical repeaters (placed every 40-70km), and 1,600km of terrestrial cable. There are nine cable stations (two each in Australia, New Zealand, Hawaii and the US mainland, and one in Fiji) and an access point in San Jose, California.

 

Both cables in the network contain six optical fibres (3 fibre pairs) between Sydney and Hawaii, and eight fibres (4 fibre pairs) between Hawaii and the US West Coast

http://www.southerncrosscables.com/home/network/overviewandmap. For the map click on Segments and hover over the lines to get detailed information on the cable. The map is also slightly out of date since it shows each wavelength at 10Gb/s when there are some 100Gb/s wavelengths now.

 

The interesting thing to note is the low number of fibre pairs, personally I expected more until I looked in to it.

 

Also last I heard a competing cable for the South Cross Cable has been approved and funded to go ahead so there might be a new documentary following the construction of that, I would like to watch it so I hope there is one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, zMeul said:

 

While you're whining about it, just remember how the phrase started and who it started with: network engineers. It was / is common-practice to use a cloud to denote other networks / the internet in network diagrams. Idiots are idiots, but that term isn't really all that idiotic, most of the people using it are. It has been used as such since the 90's. It's practically the same as "the grid" and I'm perfectly fine with it as a phrase.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Windspeed36 said:

That's why I bought some of these:


d35d044064acefa30f838e39cff7e6c1.jpg

YES! I've been waiting a while to hear that there's other people who this aggravates. 

- ASUS X99 Deluxe - i7 5820k - Nvidia GTX 1080ti SLi - 4x4GB EVGA SSC 2800mhz DDR4 - Samsung SM951 500 - 2x Samsung 850 EVO 512 -

- EK Supremacy EVO CPU Block - EK FC 1080 GPU Blocks - EK XRES 100 DDC - EK Coolstream XE 360 - EK Coolstream XE 240 -

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, zMeul said:

it's a fucking server farm somewhere in a bunker, deep underground in a undisclosed location

I get upset when people think companies keep servers in bunkers and in top secret underground locations.

 

99% are just large buildings with some extra security.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Brenz said:

I get upset when people think companies keep servers in bunkers and in top secret underground locations.

 

99% are just large buildings with some extra security.

depends on what you have to work with

most of them are housed in decommissioned rocket bunkers and similar ex-military installations 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, zMeul said:

depends on what you have to work with

most of them are housed in decommissioned rocket bunkers and similar ex-military installations 

They really aren't. It's vastly cheaper to build a new structure designed with all the power, data and cooling exactly where you need it than it is to retrofit an old building.

 

In the end the cost of the building is a lot less than the hardware inside.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, zMeul said:

depends on what you have to work with

most of them are housed in decommissioned rocket bunkers and similar ex-military installations 

 

3 hours ago, Brenz said:

They really aren't. It's vastly cheaper to build a new structure designed with all the power, data and cooling exactly where you need it than it is to retrofit an old building.

 

In the end the cost of the building is a lot less than the hardware inside.

 

Fairly sure, or I very much hope, he was joking/being sarcastic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, leadeater said:

Fairly sure, or I very much hope, he was joking/being sarcastic.

You never know anymore. Some people really think their data is floating around in sky apparently. :D

-KuJoe

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

KTEBsoh.jpg

Intel i7 4790k / MSI Z97M / Hyper 212 Evo / MSI Twin Frozr GTX 770 / 16GB Corsair Vengeance 1600MHz / Fractal Design Arc Mini R2 / Corsair CS750M / Samsung 840 Evo 250gb SSD /  WD Blue 1TB

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×