Jump to content

5960X vs. 5820K for video editing

Lloyd

I'm planning a PC build for my editing workstation and naturally chose the 5960X because ALL DEM CORES and I'm finding quite a few people are choosing the 5820K for use in video editing machines as opposed to the two higher models. Is it a price/performance choice? A simple budgetary constriction?

 

Considering the massive potential cost saving, could anyone give me an idea of the kind of performance reductions I can expect with using the 5820K (6 Cores/28 threads) as opposed to the 5960X (8 Cores/40 threads).

 

Thanks,

 

Lloyd

CURRENT - Dell XPS 15 9550

 

DECEASED - CPU - Core i7 870 @ 2.93GHz || Motherboard - MSI 7613 Ver. 1.0 || RAM - 2x8GB Corsair Vengeance @ 1333MHz || Graphics card - MSI GT 220 || Storage - 1x240GB SanDisk SSD Plus (Windows 7 SP1), 1x 960GB SanDisk Ultra II (Premiere/After Effects Projects, 1x 640GB WD Caviar Blue (Data Drive), 2x 4TB Seagate External USB 3.0 HDD

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Lloyd said:

I'm planning a PC build for my editing workstation and naturally chose the 5960X because ALL DEM CORES and I'm finding quite a few people are choosing the 5820K for use in video editing machines as opposed to the two higher models. Is it a price/performance choice? A simple budgetary constriction?

 

Considering the massive potential cost saving, could anyone give me an idea of the kind of performance reductions I can expect with using the 5820K (6 Cores/28 threads) as opposed to the 5960X (8 Cores/40 threads).

 

Thanks,

 

Lloyd

Expect a noticeable but not life-threatening decrease in multithreaded apps due to the core reduction, which is somewhat compensated by the 5820k's 10% increase in clock speed.

 

If you're going to run a stupid amount of PCIe cards then logically you should expect a decrease in that speed, but unless you're going to run three 16x GPUs then I wouldn't worry too much.

 

Or could wait for Broadwell-E and get DAT 10 CORE GOODNESS M8

Primary Build: i7-4790 · 16GB Hynix DDR3-1600 · Sapphire Tri-X R9 390x · NZXT S340 · Win10 Pro · Seagate Barracuda 1TB T_T

Portable: 2015 Retina Macbook Pro 13" · i5-5257u · 512GB PCIe SSD · Intel Iris 6100 T_T

If my post helped you, please rate it!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Lloyd said:

I'm planning a PC build for my editing workstation and naturally chose the 5960X because ALL DEM CORES and I'm finding quite a few people are choosing the 5820K for use in video editing machines as opposed to the two higher models. Is it a price/performance choice? A simple budgetary constriction?

 

Considering the massive potential cost saving, could anyone give me an idea of the kind of performance reductions I can expect with using the 5820K (6 Cores/28 threads) as opposed to the 5960X (8 Cores/40 threads).

 

Thanks,

 

Lloyd

5820K will be about 80% the performance of the 5960X if both are left at stock frequency.

 

Also, it's 6 cores/12 threads vs. 8 cores/16 threads. 28/40 is the number of PCI Express lanes provided by that CPU.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

From what I've seen, render times aren't significantly shortened between the 5820k and 5960x, but that's just one aspect. I'm sure the whole process runs a little smoother while working, but I think my 5820k does the job to well for me to justify the 5960x for myself at least.

- ASUS X99 Deluxe - i7 5820k - Nvidia GTX 1080ti SLi - 4x4GB EVGA SSC 2800mhz DDR4 - Samsung SM951 500 - 2x Samsung 850 EVO 512 -

- EK Supremacy EVO CPU Block - EK FC 1080 GPU Blocks - EK XRES 100 DDC - EK Coolstream XE 360 - EK Coolstream XE 240 -

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Glenwing said:

5820K will be about 80% the performance of the 5960X if both are left at stock frequency.

 

Also, it's 6 cores/12 threads vs. 8 cores/16 threads. 28/40 is the number of PCI Express lanes provided by that CPU.

So correct me if I'm wrong, a 5960x makes only sense when going three way SLI and a 5820K for two way SLI, if both system's intentions are video editing/modelling?

Unless you have a limitless budget.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you're considering a 5960x I would personally look into one of the 10 core Xeon E5v3 instead since its about the same price.

CPU: Intel i7 - 5820k @ 4.5GHz, Cooler: Corsair H80i, Motherboard: MSI X99S Gaming 7, RAM: Corsair Vengeance LPX 32GB DDR4 2666MHz CL16,

GPU: ASUS GTX 980 Strix, Case: Corsair 900D, PSU: Corsair AX860i 860W, Keyboard: Logitech G19, Mouse: Corsair M95, Storage: Intel 730 Series 480GB SSD, WD 1.5TB Black

Display: BenQ XL2730Z 2560x1440 144Hz

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Glenwing said:

5820K will be about 80% the performance of the 5960X if both are left at stock frequency.

 

Also, it's 6 cores/12 threads vs. 8 cores/16 threads. 28/40 is the number of PCI Express lanes provided by that CPU.

Doh, I meant that, my bad!

CURRENT - Dell XPS 15 9550

 

DECEASED - CPU - Core i7 870 @ 2.93GHz || Motherboard - MSI 7613 Ver. 1.0 || RAM - 2x8GB Corsair Vengeance @ 1333MHz || Graphics card - MSI GT 220 || Storage - 1x240GB SanDisk SSD Plus (Windows 7 SP1), 1x 960GB SanDisk Ultra II (Premiere/After Effects Projects, 1x 640GB WD Caviar Blue (Data Drive), 2x 4TB Seagate External USB 3.0 HDD

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Paralectic said:

So correct me if I'm wrong, a 5960x makes only sense when going three way SLI and a 5820K for two way SLI, if both system's intentions are video editing/modelling?

Unless you have a limitless budget.

The 5820K can do x8/x8/x8 which is fine for 3-way SLI, but it depends on how the motherboard is wired whether this is possible or not. If you can get a board with this configuration on a 28-lane CPU I don't see any problem with using the 5820K for 3-way SLI.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm guessing then the 5820K will handle 4K workflows pretty smoothly as well?

CURRENT - Dell XPS 15 9550

 

DECEASED - CPU - Core i7 870 @ 2.93GHz || Motherboard - MSI 7613 Ver. 1.0 || RAM - 2x8GB Corsair Vengeance @ 1333MHz || Graphics card - MSI GT 220 || Storage - 1x240GB SanDisk SSD Plus (Windows 7 SP1), 1x 960GB SanDisk Ultra II (Premiere/After Effects Projects, 1x 640GB WD Caviar Blue (Data Drive), 2x 4TB Seagate External USB 3.0 HDD

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CUDA_Cores said:

Do you mind buying used parts? Because you can build a dual sandy bridge-EP Xeon E5-2970 system on ebay that will absolutely destroy a single 5960X for video editing. If you do not buying used CPUs (these are server CPUs that have been babied all their lives) you can get a killer dual-xeon system on the cheap. 

2x8 core CPU for $75 each

http://www.ebay.com/sch/i.html?_from=R40&_sacat=0&_nkw=e5+2670&rt=nc&LH_BIN=1

mobo for $310

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16813182967

64GB of ECC registered memory for $120

http://www.ebay.com/itm/64GB-Lot-8x-8GB-HP-500205-071-Samsung-Memory-DDR3-1333-PC3-10600R-Reg-Server-RAM-/331775820216?hash=item4d3f6141b8:g:wg4AAOSw~OVWvLEp

Building an older but still capable dual-xeon system like this will absolutely destroy a single 5960x. If speed is a necessity this is a fantastic deal. You can get a mobo+CPU+RAM+CPU cooler all for uunder the cost of a single 5960X all while crushing a 5960x in benchmarks. I highly recommend you do that. 

That's some really good advice!

 

I'll certainly have to look into this, the i7-870 I'm running right now was picked up from eBay, albeit allegedly unboxed and new, so I've had at least one success with getting stuff that way.

 

I guess I'll just have to make a judgement call regarding the potential risks involved in using used components, particularly as this would be my main workstation.

CURRENT - Dell XPS 15 9550

 

DECEASED - CPU - Core i7 870 @ 2.93GHz || Motherboard - MSI 7613 Ver. 1.0 || RAM - 2x8GB Corsair Vengeance @ 1333MHz || Graphics card - MSI GT 220 || Storage - 1x240GB SanDisk SSD Plus (Windows 7 SP1), 1x 960GB SanDisk Ultra II (Premiere/After Effects Projects, 1x 640GB WD Caviar Blue (Data Drive), 2x 4TB Seagate External USB 3.0 HDD

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Lloyd said:

I'm planning a PC build for my editing workstation and naturally chose the 5960X because ALL DEM CORES and I'm finding quite a few people are choosing the 5820K for use in video editing machines as opposed to the two higher models. Is it a price/performance choice? A simple budgetary constriction?

 

Considering the massive potential cost saving, could anyone give me an idea of the kind of performance reductions I can expect with using the 5820K (6 Cores/28 threads) as opposed to the 5960X (8 Cores/40 threads).

 

Thanks,

 

Lloyd

If the 5960X would be cutting into the GPU or monitor budget then I would go with the 5820k, excellent chip that will suite you well. One thing to also consider is the 6960X which will probably be around that same $1000 price point, maybe slightly more that will be a 10 core 20 thread... basically it will dethrone the 5960X and take it's place for the hybrid gaming/workstation builds. So you could get the 5820k as a placeholder until then and then resale it for a slight discount on ebay if you choose to pick up the 6960X. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×