ValvE's VR performance test - is your PC ready for VR?

[Ryzza5]

https://monosnap.com/file/4OpOSUdyGu6YPAlRZEtmCJ4SVolYef.png

[Totallycasual]

Looks like im ready  

 

[eman420x]

My results.

[NumLock21]

[iamdarkyoshi]

Not bad, not bad.

[iamdarkyoshi]

lel it thinks I have twelve threads instead of twelve cores

[captain cactus]

1 hour ago, iamdarkyoshi said:

lel it thinks I have twelve threads instead of twelve cores

It counts every core and thread simply as cores.

 

That's how you see 5960Xs with 16 cores and then you're even more jealous of the folks owning those chips.

[kajar9]

R9 290 @ (1065MHz Core & 1300MHz VRAM) and i5 2500k @ (4.6GHz)

[Beliskner]

2600k is still good enough

[deviant88]

On 2/22/2016 at 11:04 PM, Abdul201588 said:

I'll put my score once it finishes the download. 

 

 

 

 

How can a 7900 series card get 2.7 score and vr capable but my gtx 670 and gtx 680 people which are on par performance wise get 0.9 score and not capable.

You either have 2x 7950/70 or this benchmark is bullshit.

[Sir Asvald]

5 minutes ago, deviant88 said:

How can a 7900 series card get 2.7 score and vr capable but my gtx 670 and gtx 680 people which are on par performance wise get 0.9 score and not capable.

You either have 2x 7950/70 or this benchmark is bullshit.

My card is the 7950, but I've overclocked it 7970 level. You can look at my previous posts, I've GPU-Z and MSI afterburner printscreens. Also, I'm not at my place, Visiting my parents. So no PC with.  Only my crappy Dell laptop. 

[SolarNova]

Would like to try this, though from what others have gotten im sure my OC'ed 780 classy would do fine.

 

But, im not installing steam and rummaging around to find my old login just do install this.

[leonard_sun]

 

 

The cost of upgrade for the end of the year 2015 was well worth it.

Edited February 28, 2016 by leonard_sun

[combatplayer]

i do want that graphics upgrade, but at this rate it looks like it'll be a while as i have no actual need to upgrade

 

[Nivius]

 

happy!  and i haven't even overclocked anything yet

[Spa]

[Kamina]

My wallet aint ready.

[SOPHOS]

It says about overkill and staff. It's not using my second 980 though. Not SLI friendly...

[gocchin]

[SaladFingers]

This test doesn't appear to be very reliable... I see systems that are worse than others score better, and their "Frames Tested" being lower by a thousand or more, meaning lower fps overall.

[40alien85]

This must not take into account SLI. GTX 960 is "capable" but dual GTX 660s are not? Dual 660s are just a little slower than a GTX 970 at 1080p

[Arcmanov]

Not too shabby...

 

[Kinda Bottlenecked]

14 hours ago, SaladFingers said:

This test doesn't appear to be very reliable... I see systems that are worse than others score better, and their "Frames Tested" being lower by a thousand or more, meaning lower fps overall.

 

Its probably because the fidelity is higher 

[Totallycasual]

14 hours ago, SaladFingers said:

This test doesn't appear to be very reliable... I see systems that are worse than others score better, and their "Frames Tested" being lower by a thousand or more, meaning lower fps overall.

Nothing in the results show who has an overclocked GPU and who doesn't, this could account for some of the discrepancies. 

[SaladFingers]

6 hours ago, Newenthusiast said:

Nothing in the results show who has an overclocked GPU and who doesn't, this could account for some of the discrepancies. 

True, that too. But still, even without taking OC into account, some of the results look plain wrong compared to each other.