Jump to content

RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell is 3x faster than RTX A6000 in Blender Render

KidKid
By KidKid
in Graphics Cards
 Share
Posted

RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell is 3x faster than RTX A6000 in Blender Render. That's a lot for only two generations! However, RTX 6000 ADA was 2x faster than the A6000 for Blender Render, which is even more impressive.

 

RTX PRO 6000-

image.thumb.png.36c189c3bfe4b7aa781cbf7a9eae61e8.png

 

RTX 6000 ADA

 

image.thumb.png.e15bac391cd9a0e7a16f0b8b24c52585.png

 

RTX A6000

 

image.thumb.png.a61f92a9bd9afb6766a4f106c264c712.png

AMD Ryzen™ 5 5600g w/ Radeon Graphics | 16GB DDR4-3200 RAM | 256GB NVME SSD + 2TB HDD | Amazon Basics 2.0 Speakers

                                                                                            I'M JUST A REAL-LIFE TOM SAWYER

Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted
1 hour ago, KidKid said:

RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell is 3x faster than RTX A6000 in Blender Render. That's a lot for only two generations! However, RTX 6000 ADA was 2x faster than the A6000 for Blender Render, which is even more impressive.

 

RTX PRO 6000-

image.thumb.png.36c189c3bfe4b7aa781cbf7a9eae61e8.png

 

RTX 6000 ADA

 

image.thumb.png.e15bac391cd9a0e7a16f0b8b24c52585.png

 

RTX A6000

 

image.thumb.png.a61f92a9bd9afb6766a4f106c264c712.png

it was in a short from ZTT or a different reliable tech tuber where it showed gaming benchmarks of the 5090 vs the pro 6000 and the pro 6000 was in the lead by a good amount without game drivers.

proud owner of a AMD Athlon 64 cpu

PSU tier list: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1akCHL7Vhzk_EhrpIGkz8zTEvYfLDcaSpZRB6Xt6JWkc/edit?gid=1973454078#gid=1973454078

Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted

Considering that it's 5 years newer, has a bigger die, is on a way more dense process, pulls 2x the power, and costs nearly 2x the price, I should hope that it's at least 3x faster.

 

Honestly, that's mediocre progress. You're looking at it being about 1.5x better from an efficiency standpoint or 1.6x better from a price-to-performance standpoint after two generations. And most of the improvement came from the Ada generation. Blackwell is basically just a refinement on it.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted
  • Author
39 minutes ago, strange13930 said:

it was in a short from ZTT or a different reliable tech tuber where it showed gaming benchmarks of the 5090 vs the pro 6000 and the pro 6000 was in the lead by a good amount without game drivers.

So Nvidia failed in trying to make the RTX PRO 6000 not a gaming card 😏

AMD Ryzen™ 5 5600g w/ Radeon Graphics | 16GB DDR4-3200 RAM | 256GB NVME SSD + 2TB HDD | Amazon Basics 2.0 Speakers

                                                                                            I'M JUST A REAL-LIFE TOM SAWYER

Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted
  • Author
40 minutes ago, YoungBlade said:

Considering that it's 5 years newer, has a bigger die, is on a way more dense process, pulls 2x the power, and costs nearly 2x the price, I should hope that it's at least 3x faster.

 

Honestly, that's mediocre progress. You're looking at it being about 1.5x better from an efficiency standpoint or 1.6x better from a price-to-performance standpoint after two generations. And most of the improvement came from the Ada generation. Blackwell is basically just a refinement on it.

Right, it's not more power efficient than the RTX 6000 ADA, using 2x the power.

AMD Ryzen™ 5 5600g w/ Radeon Graphics | 16GB DDR4-3200 RAM | 256GB NVME SSD + 2TB HDD | Amazon Basics 2.0 Speakers

                                                                                            I'M JUST A REAL-LIFE TOM SAWYER

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing Graphics Cards

×