how to implement hevc encoding on a gt 710

[Gem_Star4071]

i want hevc encoding in moho pro but my gpu doesnt have it, i have to use moho pro to export all the frames and then use ffmpeg to convert it to hevc encoding, but that takes a long time. so i want to make it faster, these screenshots might help what i mean. oh and i havent found any backdoor in moho 14's code to add hevc support through ffmpeg

[Kilrah]

That GPU doesn't support h.265 encoding, there's no way any software can make it do it. 

[Skipple]

Just to add, there's a good wikipedia page that shows encoding support per GPU. 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nvidia_NVDEC#GPU_support

 

Is there a specific reason you need to encode to h.265? 

[OddOod]

Welcome to the forums!

You can check what cards support what encode formats here
https://developer.nvidia.com/video-encode-and-decode-gpu-support-matrix-new

 

Also, that GPU is manufactured ewaste and you likely would have saved money and gotten the same graphics performance by getting a non-f CPU 

[Kilrah]

3 minutes ago, OddOod said:

You can check what cards support what encode formats here

It's so old it's not supported anymore, so it got removed from the list.

 

3 minutes ago, OddOod said:

 

Also, that GPU is manufactured ewaste and you likely would have saved money and gotten the same graphics performance by getting a non-f CPU 

Yup. iGPU would support all that.

[GuiltySpark_]

18 minutes ago, Gem_Star4071 said:

my gpu doesnt have it

Your GPU doesn't support NVENC at all.

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nvidia_NVENC

 

Neither the Kepler 2.0 GK208B or Fermi 2.0 GF119S are listed.

[Gem_Star4071]

24 minutes ago, Kilrah said:

That GPU doesn't support h.265 encoding, there's no way any software can make it do it. 

 

10 minutes ago, Kilrah said:

It's so old it's not supported anymore, so it got removed from the list.

 

Yup. iGPU would support all that.

 

8 minutes ago, GuiltySpark_ said:

Your GPU doesn't support NVENC at all.

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nvidia_NVENC

 

Neither the Kepler 2.0 GK208B or Fermi 2.0 GF119S are listed.

i dont want it in any other format, it doesnt have h264 or else i wouldve used h264

[Gem_Star4071]

15 minutes ago, OddOod said:

Welcome to the forums!

You can check what cards support what encode formats here
https://developer.nvidia.com/video-encode-and-decode-gpu-support-matrix-new

 

Also, that GPU is manufactured ewaste and you likely would have saved money and gotten the same graphics performance by getting a non-f CPU 

i am planning to get something thats not an nvidia card later just for that reason but it does hold up some fps with overclock, just normal non gamer-ish fps

[GuiltySpark_]

1 minute ago, Gem_Star4071 said:

i dont want it in any other format, it doesnt have h264 or else i wouldve used h264

The GT710 has no hardware encoding of any kind. If you have a CPU with an iGPU it may or you can just use software encoding.

[Skipple]

3 minutes ago, Gem_Star4071 said:

 

 

i dont want it in any other format, it doesnt have h264 or else i wouldve used h264

I'm not familiar with this particular program, but the advise on their forums seems to be to output frames to a lossless image file the toss that into a proper video compositer:
https://lostmarble.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=31813

[Gem_Star4071]

1 minute ago, GuiltySpark_ said:

The GT710 has no hardware encoding of any kind. If you have a CPU with an iGPU it may or you can just use software encoding.

it has no absolute good type of hardware encoding options, i have to literally export the frames and use ffmpeg just for encoding it

[Gem_Star4071]

2 minutes ago, Skipple said:

I'm not familiar with this particular program, but the advise on their forums seems to be to output frames to a lossless image file the toss that into a proper video compositer:
https://lostmarble.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=31813

i have seen that forum, and many others when i was new to this but

but using .tiff is slow using ffmpeg for me. thats why i was like "screw this thing, i need help, for real now"

[Millios]

10 minutes ago, Gem_Star4071 said:

 

 

i dont want it in any other format, it doesnt have h264 or else i wouldve used h264

Doesnt matter if you want that specific format or h264

Buddy your GPU doesnt have it and the only way for you to have it is to get a new gpu that has it or use your iGPU in case that has it

[Kilrah]

There isn't help to be had with that hardware. If the software doesn't have a way to set CPU encode you'll have to use the intermediate files, if it did then that step could be saved but the encode would still be as slow.

[Skipple]

4 minutes ago, Gem_Star4071 said:

but using .tiff is slow using ffmpeg for me. thats why i was like "screw this thing, i need help, for real now"

Because... as others have said, your GPU doesn't support hardware encoding. You don't need help, you need a new GPU.

[OddOod]

11 minutes ago, Gem_Star4071 said:

it doesnt have h264

I'm betting that MPEG4 is an h264 preset, but the 710 doesn't support NVENC at all

11 minutes ago, Gem_Star4071 said:

thats not an nvidia card

Note that AMD and Intel are both well behind the curve with their encoders. NV really is the king of encoding

12 minutes ago, Gem_Star4071 said:

just normal non gamer-ish fps

Yes, again, you would have been better off with the iGPU of a non F CPU

[Skipple]

10 minutes ago, Gem_Star4071 said:

using .tiff

Also, why in the world are you exporting to .tiff? Unless you are doing professional work which requires the higher color depth, I really don't see a reason to use this. Why not a smaller lossless compression format like .png? 

[Millios]

4 minutes ago, OddOod said:

Note that AMD and Intel are both well behind the curve with their encoders. NV really is the king of encoding

Well behind is an overstatement

Behind they are and nv does have the upper hand but intel and amd are steadily creaping up in terms of quality and speed and they arent too far behind to the point its nvenc or nothing

[GuiltySpark_]

2 minutes ago, Millios said:

Well behind is an overstatement

Behind they are and nv does have the upper hand but intel and amd are steadily creaping up in terms of quality and speed and they arent too far behind to the point its nvenc or nothing

Yeah the latest testing of RDNA4 is actually quite good, nearly with Nvidia but either way, thats beyond the scope of this thread.

[OddOod]

20 minutes ago, Millios said:

Well behind is an overstatement

17 minutes ago, GuiltySpark_ said:

actually quite good

Thanks for the corrections!

[Gem_Star4071]

39 minutes ago, Skipple said:

Also, why in the world are you exporting to .tiff? Unless you are doing professional work which requires the higher color depth, I really don't see a reason to use this. Why not a smaller lossless compression format like .png? 

.png is lossy

 

45 minutes ago, Skipple said:

Because... as others have said, your GPU doesn't support hardware encoding. You don't need help, you need a new GPU.

oh well

[AbydosOne]

3 minutes ago, Gem_Star4071 said:

.png is lossy

PNG is not lossy.

[Gem_Star4071]

3 minutes ago, AbydosOne said:

PNG is not lossy.

im dumv

[Killjoy_NS]

7 minutes ago, Gem_Star4071 said:

im dumv

In which formats you CAN export that video file/animation?

[Gem_Star4071]

4 minutes ago, Killjoy_NS said:

In which formats you CAN export that video file/animation?

uh none(yes ive tried when i was new to it), i will stick to exporting the frames and then use ffmpeg for the encoding part