Jump to content

M.2 Adapter. PCIE vs Sata type

RAGNES7

In the end both will transfer data through a Sata Cable I belive. But one is gonna look like an Opened up Hard disk. Draws power same way as SSD do.

 

While the other option is drawing power through PCIE slot.

 

If anyone has used either of these, can you please suggest what is better

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Clarification, what exactly are you trying to do? If you're going through a SATA or USB port, either will cut the speed to 500-550mbps or less. PCIe3 and PCIe4 are much faster, but require a dedicated slot in the motherboard, and I'm not aware of any adapters to use a PCIe3 or PCIe4 through SATA. I have something similar to the opened-up hard drive (SATA M.2 to SATA) looking adapter (limited to SATA's 500-550 mbps), as well as a portable M.2 adapter enclosure that connects via USB, but I'm pretty sure it runs at standard USB 3.0 speeds, not the full PCIe3 or PCIe4.

 

By contrast, PCIe3 / PCIe4 in dedicated M.2 slots average 2200-3400 mbps or more with PCIe3, and for boot drives, this is the best configuration. There are also PCIe slot cards and brackets for this as well for PCIe3 / PCIe4, but will likely be limited to PCIe3. Just keep in mind, as I found with my Sandy Bridge LGA1155, some older CPUs do not support booting from PCIe. I think this capability came about with Coffee Lake and AM4, I've heard ASRock now has an AM3+ board with an M.2 slot that appears to be PCIe3.

 

Some PCIe4s can hit 4000-5000 or more, but they run hotter and performance increase beyond 3400 is negligible. But I'm pretty sure running a PCIe version through anything but a dedicated motherboard M.2 slot, will not achieve full speed. Also, some slots supposedly can do PCIe OR SATA, and with motherboards that have multiple M.2 slots, sometimes one (or both) will disable certain SATA ports when occupied.

 

There are also what have been dubbed DIMM.2 adapters, which are what they sound like, an M.2 adapter that uses a DIMM slot. These appear decidedly SATA, from the power and data connections up top. The opened-up hard drive adapter you refer to is likely SATA only as well.

 

In summary, the opened-up hard drive-type you speak of are great for when a drive bay is available you don't otherwise need. The other similar type I have and the DIMM.2 come in handy when you have no free drive bay in a cramped SFF case and need an option that can be tucked away somewhere.

 

Here are some examples. Left to right, DIMM.2, SATA M.2 adapter, differences in M.2 key between SATA / PCIe, and the portable enclosure I spoke of...

 

image.thumb.png.2c490404ee35da8baa8127ab24d463df.png

Edited by An0maly_76
Revised, more info

I don't badmouth others' input, I'd appreciate others not badmouthing mine. *** More below ***

 

MODERATE TO SEVERE AUTISTIC, COMPLICATED WITH COVID FOG

 

Due to the above, I've likely revised posts <30 min old, and do not think as you do.

THINK BEFORE YOU REPLY!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, An0maly_76 said:

Clarification, what exactly are you trying to do? If you're going through a SATA or USB port, either will cut the speed to 500-550mbps or less. PCIe3 and PCIe4 are much faster, but require a dedicated slot in the motherboard, and I'm not aware of any adapters to use a PCIe3 or PCIe4 through SATA. I have something similar to the opened-up hard drive (SATA M.2 to SATA) looking adapter (limited to SATA's 500-550 mbps), as well as a portable M.2 adapter enclosure that connects via USB, but I'm pretty sure it runs at standard USB 3.0 speeds, not the full PCIe3 or PCIe4.

 

By contrast, PCIe3 / PCIe4 in dedicated M.2 slots average 2200-3400 mbps or more with PCIe3, and for boot drives, this is the best configuration. There are also PCIe slot cards and brackets for this as well for PCIe3 / PCIe4, but will likely be limited to PCIe3.

 

Some PCIe4s can hit 4000-5000 or more, but they run hotter and performance increase beyond 3400 is negligible. But I'm pretty sure running a PCIe version through anything but a dedicated motherboard M.2 slot, will not achieve full speed. Also, some slots supposedly can do PCIe OR SATA, and with motherboards that have multiple M.2 slots, sometimes one (or both) will disable certain SATA ports when occupied.

 

There are also what have been dubbed DIMM.2 adapters, which are what they sound like, an M.2 adapter that uses a DIMM slot. These appear decidedly SATA, from the power and data connections up top. The opened-up hard drive adapter you refer to is likely SATA only as well.

 

In summary, the opened-up hard drive-type you speak of are great for when a drive bay is available you don't otherwise need. The other similar type I have and the DIMM.2 come in handy when you have no free drive bay in a cramped SFF case and need an option that can be tucked away somewhere. Just keep in mind, as I found with my Sandy Bridge LGA1155, some CPUs do not support booting from PCIe, but I think this capability came about with Coffee Lake and AM4, I've heard ASRock now has an AM3+ board with an M.2 slot that appears to be PCIe3.

 

Here are some examples. Left to right, DIMM.2, SATA M.2 adapter, differences in M.2 key between SATA / PCIe, and the portable enclosure I spoke of...

 

image.thumb.png.2c490404ee35da8baa8127ab24d463df.png

exactly what I was thinking, +1.

  • CPU
    I7 12700KF
  • Motherboard
    MSI Tomahawk z690 WIFI DDR4
  • RAM
    16gb Vengeance Pro
  • GPU
    RTX 3070 TI
  • Case
    NZXT H700i
  • Storage
    crucial P2 500gb m.2
    Raid 0 16tb server
  • PSU
    Corsair RM1000X
  • Display(s)
    ASUS PG259QN 360hz
    ASUS PG278QE 165hz
  • Cooling
    NZXT KRAKEN X62
  • Keyboard
    Corsair K95P Brown
    Ducky one 2 SF Silver
  • Mouse
    Razer Viper Ultimate
    logitech pro superlight x
  • Sound
    DT 990 PRO
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

pci-e 2.0 : 500 MB/s per lane 

pci-e 3.0 : 985 MB/s per lane 

pci-e 4.0 : 1970 MB/s per lane 

 

An M.2 connector can have  1, 2 or 4 pci-e lanes in it. So depending on pci-e version and number of lanes, you could have maximum speed anything between 500 MB/s and 7880 MB/s

The maximum effective speed will depend on the controller used on the SSD and also on memory chips used (MLC is faster than TLC which is much faster than QLC, and even between same type there's differences ex a 96 layer TLC chip may be faster than 112 layer chip, but the 112 layer TLC chip is cheaper so it's more used) 

 

For example, B450 chipset on socket AM4 only creates pci-e 2.0 lanes, while the pci-e lanes coming from CPU are pci-e 3.0.  The M.2 connector close to the CPU will have 4 pci-e 3.0 lanes (and therefore up to around 4 GB/s speeds if the controller on SSD can also achieve that)  but the second M.2 connector will usually receive 2 or 4 pci-e 2.0 lanes from the chipset, so the maximum speed would be 1 GB/s or 2 GB/s 

 

There are adapters that can be plugged in a pci-e slot and support 1 or 2 M.2 drives -  usually the adapter simply routes 4 pci-e lanes from the slot, to the first M.2 connector on the adapter - that's the only NVME SSD supported. If the slot is pci-e 2.0, then you get up to 4 pci-e 2.0 lanes and maximum 2 GB/s. 

The second M.2 slot is just SATA, and there's no connection to motherboard besides power - the adapter just offers a slot to plug the adapter in, and a SATA data connector to attach a SATA cable between the adapter and the sata port on your motherboard.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×