Jump to content

Samsung 970 evo plus vs crucial p5 vs kingston a2000 ? 500gb version

NikitaSch
By NikitaSch
in Storage Devices
 Share
Posted

All of them are the same price. What is the difference and which one is the best?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted

970 evo plus is the best, its usual disadvantage is price but this time it doesn't apply.

 

They are different in controller and memory chips used. A2000 is clearly worse since it's transfer speed is around 2GB/s at best, while the other two do 3GB/s

CPU: i7-2600K 4751MHz 1.44V (software) --> 1.47V at the back of the socket Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Extreme4 (BCLK: 103.3MHz) CPU Cooler: Noctua NH-D15 RAM: Adata XPG 2x8GB DDR3 (XMP: 2133MHz 10-11-11-30 CR2, custom: 2203MHz 10-11-10-26 CR1 tRFC:230 tREFI:14000) GPU: Asus GTX 1070 Dual (Super Jetstream vbios, +70(2025-2088MHz)/+400(8.8Gbps)) SSD: Samsung 840 Pro 256GB (main boot drive), Transcend SSD370 128GB PSU: Seasonic X-660 80+ Gold Case: Antec P110 Silent, 5 intakes 1 exhaust Monitor: AOC G2460PF 1080p 144Hz (150Hz max w/ DP, 121Hz max w/ HDMI) TN panel Keyboard: Logitech G610 Orion (Cherry MX Blue) with SteelSeries Apex M260 keycaps Mouse: BenQ Zowie FK1

 

Model: HP Omen 17 17-an110ca CPU: i7-8750H (0.125V core & cache, 50mV SA undervolt) GPU: GTX 1060 6GB Mobile (+80/+450, 1650MHz~1750MHz 0.78V~0.85V) RAM: 8+8GB DDR4-2400 18-17-17-39 2T Storage: HP EX920 1TB PCIe x4 M.2 SSD + Crucial MX500 1TB 2.5" SATA SSD, 128GB Toshiba PCIe x2 M.2 SSD (KBG30ZMV128G) gone cooking externally, 1TB Seagate 7200RPM 2.5" HDD (ST1000LM049-2GH172) left outside Monitor: 1080p 126Hz IPS G-sync

 

Desktop benching:

Cinebench R15 Single thread:168 Multi-thread: 833 

SuperPi (v1.5 from Techpowerup, PI value output) 16K: 0.100s 1M: 8.255s 32M: 7m 45.93s

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted
  • Author
4 minutes ago, Jurrunio said:

970 evo plus is the best, its usual disadvantage is price but this time it doesn't apply.

 

They are different in controller and memory chips used. A2000 is clearly worse since it's transfer speed is around 2GB/s at best, while the other two do 3GB/s

But what version of 970 evo plus is the best ? MLC OR TLC?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted
Just now, NikitaSch said:

But what version of 970 evo plus is the best ? MLC OR TLC?

Samsung trick here, they call it 3-bit MLC which is just TLC.

 

970 PRO is the 2bit MLC here, not Evo. They ditched MLC on the 980 Pro altogether.

CPU: i7-2600K 4751MHz 1.44V (software) --> 1.47V at the back of the socket Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Extreme4 (BCLK: 103.3MHz) CPU Cooler: Noctua NH-D15 RAM: Adata XPG 2x8GB DDR3 (XMP: 2133MHz 10-11-11-30 CR2, custom: 2203MHz 10-11-10-26 CR1 tRFC:230 tREFI:14000) GPU: Asus GTX 1070 Dual (Super Jetstream vbios, +70(2025-2088MHz)/+400(8.8Gbps)) SSD: Samsung 840 Pro 256GB (main boot drive), Transcend SSD370 128GB PSU: Seasonic X-660 80+ Gold Case: Antec P110 Silent, 5 intakes 1 exhaust Monitor: AOC G2460PF 1080p 144Hz (150Hz max w/ DP, 121Hz max w/ HDMI) TN panel Keyboard: Logitech G610 Orion (Cherry MX Blue) with SteelSeries Apex M260 keycaps Mouse: BenQ Zowie FK1

 

Model: HP Omen 17 17-an110ca CPU: i7-8750H (0.125V core & cache, 50mV SA undervolt) GPU: GTX 1060 6GB Mobile (+80/+450, 1650MHz~1750MHz 0.78V~0.85V) RAM: 8+8GB DDR4-2400 18-17-17-39 2T Storage: HP EX920 1TB PCIe x4 M.2 SSD + Crucial MX500 1TB 2.5" SATA SSD, 128GB Toshiba PCIe x2 M.2 SSD (KBG30ZMV128G) gone cooking externally, 1TB Seagate 7200RPM 2.5" HDD (ST1000LM049-2GH172) left outside Monitor: 1080p 126Hz IPS G-sync

 

Desktop benching:

Cinebench R15 Single thread:168 Multi-thread: 833 

SuperPi (v1.5 from Techpowerup, PI value output) 16K: 0.100s 1M: 8.255s 32M: 7m 45.93s

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted
  • Author
1 minute ago, Jurrunio said:

Samsung trick here, they call it 3-bit MLC which is just TLC.

 

970 PRO is the 2bit MLC here, not Evo. They ditched MLC on the 980 Pro altogether.

So there is no difference between them?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted
  • Author
1 minute ago, Benji said:

Exactly. The 970 Evo Plus is the 970 Evo Plus. There are no different versions to my knowledge.

In my country in the stores are available 2 versions: the  V-NAND MLC and TLC.That's why i was asking because the mlc version was a little bit cheaper and everyone says mlc is better than tlc 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted
2 minutes ago, NikitaSch said:

In my country in the stores are available 2 versions: the  V-NAND MLC and TLC.That's why i was asking because the mlc version was a little bit cheaper and everyone says mlc is better than tlc 

Then Samsung's marketing trick worked on retailers too. They are the same product.

CPU: i7-2600K 4751MHz 1.44V (software) --> 1.47V at the back of the socket Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Extreme4 (BCLK: 103.3MHz) CPU Cooler: Noctua NH-D15 RAM: Adata XPG 2x8GB DDR3 (XMP: 2133MHz 10-11-11-30 CR2, custom: 2203MHz 10-11-10-26 CR1 tRFC:230 tREFI:14000) GPU: Asus GTX 1070 Dual (Super Jetstream vbios, +70(2025-2088MHz)/+400(8.8Gbps)) SSD: Samsung 840 Pro 256GB (main boot drive), Transcend SSD370 128GB PSU: Seasonic X-660 80+ Gold Case: Antec P110 Silent, 5 intakes 1 exhaust Monitor: AOC G2460PF 1080p 144Hz (150Hz max w/ DP, 121Hz max w/ HDMI) TN panel Keyboard: Logitech G610 Orion (Cherry MX Blue) with SteelSeries Apex M260 keycaps Mouse: BenQ Zowie FK1

 

Model: HP Omen 17 17-an110ca CPU: i7-8750H (0.125V core & cache, 50mV SA undervolt) GPU: GTX 1060 6GB Mobile (+80/+450, 1650MHz~1750MHz 0.78V~0.85V) RAM: 8+8GB DDR4-2400 18-17-17-39 2T Storage: HP EX920 1TB PCIe x4 M.2 SSD + Crucial MX500 1TB 2.5" SATA SSD, 128GB Toshiba PCIe x2 M.2 SSD (KBG30ZMV128G) gone cooking externally, 1TB Seagate 7200RPM 2.5" HDD (ST1000LM049-2GH172) left outside Monitor: 1080p 126Hz IPS G-sync

 

Desktop benching:

Cinebench R15 Single thread:168 Multi-thread: 833 

SuperPi (v1.5 from Techpowerup, PI value output) 16K: 0.100s 1M: 8.255s 32M: 7m 45.93s

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted
  • Author
1 minute ago, Benji said:

MLC used to refer to two-cell NAND while it is just an abbreviation for Multi-Level Cell, so it can mean anything above two bits per cell. In that case it's marketing wish wash to make you believe that you're buying something better. The 970 Evo Plus only ever existed with TLC NAND.

Thanks for the info.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted

I'm not sure but I think KC2500 beats 970 evo plus and the price is lower..so he might go with that one..

Cuz I don't like Samsung... 😕

 

Please do not take offence for my apparent confusion or rudeness,it's not intent me to be like that,it's just my BPD,be nice to me,and I'll return twice better,be rude and usually I get easly pissed of...I'll try to help anyone here,as long as it's something I dealt with,and even if you think I'm rude or not polite,forgive me,  it's not me it's my BPD.

Thanks for understanding.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted
8 hours ago, frozensun said:

I'm not sure but I think KC2500 beats 970 evo plus and the price is lower..so he might go with that one..

Cuz I don't like Samsung... 😕

He said that they are the same price. And why don't you like samsung? Any actual relevant reason or just because they are not the underdog? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing Storage Devices

×