Jump to content

F@H Question. Why's my gpu only using 25%?

image.thumb.png.fe1f986fab294c3bc71670832ede9844.png

 

I've seen it at 50% for sure also (think I've seen it near 100%, but I'm not certain of that). I'm assuming it has something to do with cuda core vs render cores or something to that effect, but I'd still assume F@H could use more than 25% of the gpu's processing power. I'm asking cause I'm used to seeing my estimate at 6 million per day, and it's currently hovering at 700,000ish per day. Is it just a slower time for higher rated tasks atm? I know last year there was a time period where I was only getting like 1-2 gpu tasks a day that only ran for an hour or two.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Heavy cpu bottleneck looks like. But usually folding wouldnt have any issue with cpu bottlenecks. Not 100% sure

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Are you using full power folding? or low power? (you can change this in the web client)

I could use some help with this!

please, pm me if you would like to contribute to my gpu bios database (includes overclocking bios, stock bios, and upgrades to gpus via modding)

Bios database

My beautiful, but not that powerful, main PC:

prior build:

Spoiler

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Hyrogenes said:

Heavy cpu bottleneck looks like. But usually folding wouldnt have any issue with cpu bottlenecks. Not 100% sure

CPU is cause I have folding@home doing both CPU and GPU processes. (CPU is 3950x, GPU is 3090)

image.thumb.png.a5a307516e365102ec7d9b6d126b9d08.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Click on the the title above one of the graphs (i.e. "Video Encode") and change it to "CUDA". That is where F@H usage is recorded at.

I see the CPU is at 100%. The general rule of thumb with Nvidia GPU's + F@H is leaving 1 thread over for the program itself and then 1 thread per every Nvidia GPU you're running.

You can change the amount of threads used in the advanced settings of the F@H desktop program.

"We're all in this together, might as well be friends" Tom, Toonami.

 

mini eLiXiVy: my open source 65% mechanical PCB, a build log, PCB anatomy and discussing open source licenses: https://linustechtips.com/topic/1366493-elixivy-a-65-mechanical-keyboard-build-log-pcb-anatomy-and-how-i-open-sourced-this-project/

 

mini_cardboard: a 4% keyboard build log and how keyboards workhttps://linustechtips.com/topic/1328547-mini_cardboard-a-4-keyboard-build-log-and-how-keyboards-work/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

-_- just saw that it changed to 7 million again. Guess the estimate was just off for a bit.

 

(I counted the digits 5+ times to be certain my eyes weren't playing tricks.)

 

 

-_- Thanks for the help all. I may just be a numpty.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Caliber Mengsk said:

-_- just saw that it changed to 7 million again. Guess the estimate was just off for a bit.

 

(I counted the digits 5+ times to be certain my eyes weren't playing tricks.)

 

 

-_- Thanks for the help all. I may just be a numpty.

You'll find the estimate swings quite a bit. Don't get too fixated on it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Den-Fi said:

You'll find the estimate swings quite a bit. Don't get too fixated on it.

Yeah, I know it moves, but it's normally not quite that drastic. It's normally between 6.5 million and 8.5 million depending on the task it's doing, not 700,000.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Caliber Mengsk said:

GPU is 3090

what's the VRAM temp?

you might be throttling due to VRAM overheating

since F@H hits VRAM quite hard

-sigh- feeling like I'm being too negative lately

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Moonzy said:

what's the VRAM temp?

you might be throttling due to VRAM overheating

since F@H hits VRAM quite hard

HWInfo doesn't say specifically vram.

image.png.358c7f727fced116fefadfa24ab980a0.png

 

I'm guessing that'd be the "Memory Junction Temperature" but I'm not sure what all things should be beside the main gpu temperature, in which 70 is totally normal. It's also only using 1.7gb of vram, so I don't "think" it would cause a lot of heat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Caliber Mengsk said:

HWInfo doesn't say specifically vram.

image.png.358c7f727fced116fefadfa24ab980a0.png

 

I'm guessing that'd be the "Memory Junction Temperature" but I'm not sure what all things should be beside the main gpu temperature, in which 70 is totally normal. It's also only using 1.7gb of vram, so I don't "think" it would cause a lot of heat.

memory junction temp is the right parameter to look at

 

can you screencap more info that than? im particularly interested in the board power

 

did you do any undervolting or adjustments to clock speeds at all?

 

from the looks of it, you're way below the throttling limit which is 110c for memory junction temp

-sigh- feeling like I'm being too negative lately

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Moonzy said:

memory junction temp is the right parameter to look at

 

can you screencap more info that than? im particularly interested in the board power

 

did you do any undervolting or adjustments to clock speeds at all?

 

from the looks of it, you're way below the throttling limit which is 110c for memory junction temp

image.png.1b34d1f128fcad221e5ce0e9b4c8bad1.png

 

There's all the GPU info. It's all at stock, no overclocking on cpu or gpu.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Caliber Mengsk said:

There's all the GPU info. It's all at stock, no overclocking on cpu or gpu.

looks all normal, you're good

-sigh- feeling like I'm being too negative lately

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×