Jump to content

Hi my Full HD Monitor downscales 4K to Full HD on consoles but not on PC

chris1982

Hi there,

 

bought a new LG 27GL63T-B. On console i can set the resolution to 4K and the Monitor downscales it and shows it in Full HD. I know that it must be the monitor because on my old Asus Full HD i cant set the resolution to 4K on the consoles. But on PC i cant set the resolution to 4K with the LG. Can someone tell me why? Thanks!

IMG_1762.jpeg

IMG_1761.jpeg

IMG_1760.jpeg

IMG_1758.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

it can. i found a soulution. The AMD driver blocked unsupported resolutions. So i used Custom Resolution Utility to set a 4K Resolution. Now it works. I dont know if amd doesnt know that there are downscaling monitors on the market or why 4K is blocked but it workes now XD 

downscaling Monitor.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

What's the point tho?

F@H
Desktop: i9-13900K, ASUS Z790-E, 64GB DDR5-6000 CL36, RTX3080, 2TB MP600 Pro XT, 2TB SX8200Pro, 2x16TB Ironwolf RAID0, Corsair HX1200, Antec Vortex 360 AIO, Thermaltake Versa H25 TG, Samsung 4K curved 49" TV, 23" secondary, Mountain Everest Max

Mobile SFF rig: i9-9900K, Noctua NH-L9i, Asrock Z390 Phantom ITX-AC, 32GB, GTX1070, 2x1TB SX8200Pro RAID0, 2x5TB 2.5" HDD RAID0, Athena 500W Flex (Noctua fan), Custom 4.7l 3D printed case

 

Asus Zenbook UM325UA, Ryzen 7 5700u, 16GB, 1TB, OLED

 

GPD Win 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

downscaled pictures look better than native resolution. Did you ever watched a 4k video on an Full HD Smartphone screen? An higher than Full HD resolution image downsampled to Full HD look better than native Full HD. An higher than 4K resolution image downsampled to 4k look better than native 4k

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, but you have nothing to gain from outputting 4K and have the monitor downscale compared to rendering at 200% scaling and outputting 1080P, the GPU actually likely downscales better than the monitor does.

F@H
Desktop: i9-13900K, ASUS Z790-E, 64GB DDR5-6000 CL36, RTX3080, 2TB MP600 Pro XT, 2TB SX8200Pro, 2x16TB Ironwolf RAID0, Corsair HX1200, Antec Vortex 360 AIO, Thermaltake Versa H25 TG, Samsung 4K curved 49" TV, 23" secondary, Mountain Everest Max

Mobile SFF rig: i9-9900K, Noctua NH-L9i, Asrock Z390 Phantom ITX-AC, 32GB, GTX1070, 2x1TB SX8200Pro RAID0, 2x5TB 2.5" HDD RAID0, Athena 500W Flex (Noctua fan), Custom 4.7l 3D printed case

 

Asus Zenbook UM325UA, Ryzen 7 5700u, 16GB, 1TB, OLED

 

GPD Win 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Kilrah said:

Yes, but you have nothing to gain from outputting 4K and have the monitor downscale compared to rendering at 200% scaling and outputting 1080P, the GPU actually likely downscales better than the monitor does.

But doesnt it affect the performance of the GPU to render and scale at the same time instead of just render the image in 4K?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

No, shouldn't. Scaling is like nothing for a GPU.

F@H
Desktop: i9-13900K, ASUS Z790-E, 64GB DDR5-6000 CL36, RTX3080, 2TB MP600 Pro XT, 2TB SX8200Pro, 2x16TB Ironwolf RAID0, Corsair HX1200, Antec Vortex 360 AIO, Thermaltake Versa H25 TG, Samsung 4K curved 49" TV, 23" secondary, Mountain Everest Max

Mobile SFF rig: i9-9900K, Noctua NH-L9i, Asrock Z390 Phantom ITX-AC, 32GB, GTX1070, 2x1TB SX8200Pro RAID0, 2x5TB 2.5" HDD RAID0, Athena 500W Flex (Noctua fan), Custom 4.7l 3D printed case

 

Asus Zenbook UM325UA, Ryzen 7 5700u, 16GB, 1TB, OLED

 

GPD Win 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×