Jump to content

Signal Needs to do Better For its Response to the Anti-Censorship Community

Batman 007

Summary

 

A security flaw in Signal was reported in a rude manner. Signal closed the issue calling it a technique by design. Who is right and who is wrong?

 

Quotes

Quote

But, even then, why can’t they properly address a concern by security researchers? An official tweet about the concern? A blog post to clarify (with a disclaimer) that the proxy implementation isn’t the best solution and is potentially risky for the future or a tougher censorship system?

Not to dismiss the fact that yet another security researcher Sergey Frolovalso claims that he reported some concerns for Signal’s app in the past but did not receive any response either. That does not sound excellent to me.

 

My thoughts

 I think Signal should address this officially.

 

Sources

https://news.itsfoss.com/signal-github-controversy/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

-= Topic Locked =-

 

As mentioned, this is a repost.

COMMUNITY STANDARDS   |   TECH NEWS POSTING GUIDELINES   |   FORUM STAFF

LTT Folding Users Tips, Tricks and FAQ   |   F@H & BOINC Badge Request   |   F@H Contribution    My Rig   |   Project Steamroller

I am a Moderator, but I am fallible. Discuss or debate with me as you will but please do not argue with me as that will get us nowhere.

 

Spoiler

  

 

Character is like a Tree and Reputation like its Shadow. The Shadow is what we think of it; The Tree is the Real thing.  ~ Abraham Lincoln

Reputation is a Lifetime to create but seconds to destroy.

You have enemies? Good. That means you've stood up for something, sometime in your life.  ~ Winston Churchill

Docendo discimus - "to teach is to learn"

 

 CHRISTIAN MEMBER 

 

 
 
 
 
 
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

×