Jump to content

Does anything (powerful enough) support 1728×1080?

Rhebucks

1728×1080 is the 1080p for 💻.  It is actually the best for 14" 💻. So, does anything (powerful enough) support 1728×1080.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

not sure what you mean, there are better resolutions for laptops, but are you looking for a laptop that can support that specific resolution?

i belive most laptops around 300$ will do just fine

Anything i've written between the * and * is not meant to be taken seriously.

keep in mind that helping with problems is hard if you aren't specific and detailed.

i'm also not a professional, (yet) so make sure to personally verify important information as i could be wrong.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Rhebucks said:

1728×1080 is the 1080p for 💻.  It is actually the best for 14" 💻. So, does anything (powerful enough) support 1728×1080.

Can you please rewrite your question, it is very unclear.

1728x1080 is not a resolution that is used.

"We're all in this together, might as well be friends" Tom, Toonami.

 

mini eLiXiVy: my open source 65% mechanical PCB, a build log, PCB anatomy and discussing open source licenses: https://linustechtips.com/topic/1366493-elixivy-a-65-mechanical-keyboard-build-log-pcb-anatomy-and-how-i-open-sourced-this-project/

 

mini_cardboard: a 4% keyboard build log and how keyboards workhttps://linustechtips.com/topic/1328547-mini_cardboard-a-4-keyboard-build-log-and-how-keyboards-work/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Rhebucks said:

1728×1080 is the 1080p for 💻.

Why? That doesn't exist. It would be a 16/10 display but with reduced width instead of increased height (1920x1200) that everyone does.

F@H
Desktop: i9-13900K, ASUS Z790-E, 64GB DDR5-6000 CL36, RTX3080, 2TB MP600 Pro XT, 2TB SX8200Pro, 2x16TB Ironwolf RAID0, Corsair HX1200, Antec Vortex 360 AIO, Thermaltake Versa H25 TG, Samsung 4K curved 49" TV, 23" secondary, Mountain Everest Max

Mobile SFF rig: i9-9900K, Noctua NH-L9i, Asrock Z390 Phantom ITX-AC, 32GB, GTX1070, 2x1TB SX8200Pro RAID0, 2x5TB 2.5" HDD RAID0, Athena 500W Flex (Noctua fan), Custom 4.7l 3D printed case

 

Asus Zenbook UM325UA, Ryzen 7 5700u, 16GB, 1TB, OLED

 

GPD Win 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Kilrah said:

Why? That doesn't exist.

 

10 minutes ago, minibois said:

Can you please rewrite your question, it is very unclear.

1728x1080 is not a resolution that is used.

I believe he wants to do this

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Use custom resolution on a PC is not new. Also you better decrease green color and increases contrast to pick people that are hiding

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

So its for stretching character models ingame for easier aquisition to the eyes.

 

Like using a 4:3 aspect stretch wider for your 16:9 panels.

Maximums - Asus Z97-K /w i5 4690 Bclk @106.9Mhz * x39 = 4.17Ghz, 8GB of 2600Mhz DDR3,.. Gigabyte GTX970 G1-Gaming @ 1550Mhz

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1728*1080 is 1080 vertically, hence 1080p

1920*1200 is 1200 vertically, hence 1080p
my thin and light 14" concept uses 1080p 16:10

1728*1080 is like the sweetspot for 14" laptops

 

On 12/29/2020 at 1:23 PM, SkilledRebuilds said:

So its for stretching character models ingame for easier aquisition to the eyes.

 

Like using a 4:3 aspect stretch wider for your 16:9 panels.

no, 16:10 is laptop standard, hence no streching

 

On 12/29/2020 at 12:53 PM, flashiling said:

not sure what you mean, there are better resolutions for laptops, but are you looking for a laptop that can support that specific resolution?

i belive most laptops around 300$ will do just fine

light gaming and some productivity

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

No.

The reason people like 16:10 is because it gives them extra "space" thanks to being 1200px vertically, nobody would want 16:10 if it gave nothing in height and cut out some of the width.

F@H
Desktop: i9-13900K, ASUS Z790-E, 64GB DDR5-6000 CL36, RTX3080, 2TB MP600 Pro XT, 2TB SX8200Pro, 2x16TB Ironwolf RAID0, Corsair HX1200, Antec Vortex 360 AIO, Thermaltake Versa H25 TG, Samsung 4K curved 49" TV, 23" secondary, Mountain Everest Max

Mobile SFF rig: i9-9900K, Noctua NH-L9i, Asrock Z390 Phantom ITX-AC, 32GB, GTX1070, 2x1TB SX8200Pro RAID0, 2x5TB 2.5" HDD RAID0, Athena 500W Flex (Noctua fan), Custom 4.7l 3D printed case

 

Asus Zenbook UM325UA, Ryzen 7 5700u, 16GB, 1TB, OLED

 

GPD Win 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1728*1080 at 14"- 61cm or further is retina
1920*1200 at 15"- 58cm or further is retina

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Rhebucks said:

no, 16:10 is laptop standard, hence no streching

It will either stretch or give you black bars depending onyour GPU settings. It's not laptop standard either. Few have a 16:10 resolution nowadays apart from macbooks as far as I know. Most are plain old 16:9 at either 1920x1080, 2560x1440 or 3840x2160. Some outliers like from Dell and Huawei offer 3:2 ratios at something like 3200x1600.

On 12/29/2020 at 11:50 AM, Rhebucks said:

1728×1080 is the 1080p for 💻.  It is actually the best for 14" 💻. So, does anything (powerful enough) support 1728×1080.

Not sure what you are trying to achieve, but you can try adding it as a custom resolution in the display settings.

 

Crystal: CPU: i7 7700K | Motherboard: Asus ROG Strix Z270F | RAM: GSkill 16 GB@3200MHz | GPU: Nvidia GTX 1080 Ti FE | Case: Corsair Crystal 570X (black) | PSU: EVGA Supernova G2 1000W | Monitor: Asus VG248QE 24"

Laptop: Dell XPS 13 9370 | CPU: i5 10510U | RAM: 16 GB

Server: CPU: i5 4690k | RAM: 16 GB | Case: Corsair Graphite 760T White | Storage: 19 TB

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, tikker said:

It will either stretch or give you black bars depending onyour GPU settings. It's not laptop standard either. Few have a 16:10 resolution nowadays apart from macbooks as far as I know. Most are plain old 16:9 at either 1920x1080, 2560x1440 or 3840x2160. Some outliers like from Dell and Huawei offer 3:2 ratios at something like 3200x1600.

Not sure what you are trying to achieve, but you can try adding it as a custom resolution in the display settings.

 

it's one of those 3 that 99.99% of laptops use

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, Rhebucks said:

it's one of those 3 that 99.99% of laptops use

Indeed. Not a single laptop will use 1728×1080, as others have said  they'll go up to 1920x1200 for the extra vertical space.

  

37 minutes ago, Rhebucks said:

It's completely theoretical

It's still not clear what you are asking here.

On 12/29/2020 at 11:50 AM, Rhebucks said:

So, does anything (powerful enough) support 1728×1080.

If this is really it, then yes. Pretty much anything nowadays is powerful enough to drive that resolution if the display supports it. You won't find a native display like that though and will have to set a custom resolution.

Crystal: CPU: i7 7700K | Motherboard: Asus ROG Strix Z270F | RAM: GSkill 16 GB@3200MHz | GPU: Nvidia GTX 1080 Ti FE | Case: Corsair Crystal 570X (black) | PSU: EVGA Supernova G2 1000W | Monitor: Asus VG248QE 24"

Laptop: Dell XPS 13 9370 | CPU: i5 10510U | RAM: 16 GB

Server: CPU: i5 4690k | RAM: 16 GB | Case: Corsair Graphite 760T White | Storage: 19 TB

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, tikker said:

If this is really it, then yes. Pretty much anything nowadays is powerful enough to drive that resolution if the display supports it.

I believe they meant "is there a reasonably powerful laptop with a 1728×1080 display", and that's a no.

F@H
Desktop: i9-13900K, ASUS Z790-E, 64GB DDR5-6000 CL36, RTX3080, 2TB MP600 Pro XT, 2TB SX8200Pro, 2x16TB Ironwolf RAID0, Corsair HX1200, Antec Vortex 360 AIO, Thermaltake Versa H25 TG, Samsung 4K curved 49" TV, 23" secondary, Mountain Everest Max

Mobile SFF rig: i9-9900K, Noctua NH-L9i, Asrock Z390 Phantom ITX-AC, 32GB, GTX1070, 2x1TB SX8200Pro RAID0, 2x5TB 2.5" HDD RAID0, Athena 500W Flex (Noctua fan), Custom 4.7l 3D printed case

 

Asus Zenbook UM325UA, Ryzen 7 5700u, 16GB, 1TB, OLED

 

GPD Win 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 1/2/2021 at 11:42 AM, Kilrah said:

I believe they meant "is there a reasonably powerful laptop with a 1728×1080 display", and that's a no.

nope

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Rhebucks said:

nope

Then at this point you really should clarify. I'm been waiting for days to get this moved to Displays or Laptops or wherever it fits. Or just locking it because it doesn't seem to go anywhere.

^^^^ That's my post ^^^^
<-- This is me --- That's your scrollbar -->
vvvv Who's there? vvvv

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

16:10 has been pretty common on a lot of apple products, and maybe some other laptops oriented towards art / video professionals.  

You would have to dig very deep to find something using this, if it exists at all, and it will probably be some kind of wacky laptop from 2012 that no one remembers. 

In theory it has it's merits; it would be a good resolution if you wanted 16:10, but your laptop GPU just couldn't get enough frames per second at 1920x1200.  It's the difference between 1.86 megapixels and 2.3 megapixels, so it's not huge but it would probably allow at least 10% better frames per second.  

Not an expert
Ryzen3600  | Aorus 5700XT  | Aorus B550 Elite 
Coolermaster ML240L AIO
G.Skill RipjawsV3600  | PNY XLR8 1TB NVMe 3.0
Westinghouse 3440x1440 ultrawide

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 12/29/2020 at 5:50 AM, Rhebucks said:

1728×1080 is the 1080p for 💻.  It is actually the best for 14" 💻. So, does anything (powerful enough) support 1728×1080.

Is the question what hardware is powerful enough to run 1080p, then the answer is pretty much anything at this point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×