Jump to content

AMD's RX 6800 Beats Nvidia's RTX 3090

TheLaggard
17 minutes ago, Falkentyne said:

I have no idea what conditions and even maps AMD is reporting here, is it some sort of average fps? (go to the first link and select cod and 1440p).

The graph shows average FPS.

CPU - Ryzen 5 5600X | CPU Cooler - EVGA CLC 240mm AIO  Motherboard - ASRock B550 Phantom Gaming 4 | RAM - 16GB (2x8GB) Patriot Viper Steel DDR4 3600MHz CL17 | GPU - MSI RTX 3070 Ventus 3X OC | PSU -  EVGA 600 BQ | Storage - PNY CS3030 1TB NVMe SSD | Case Cooler Master TD500 Mesh

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Doubble said:

OK this give me a great segway into this thing and another reason why I don't want to buy a RX6000 series . the marketing you are seeing here is complete BS due to their rage mode. They claim that their overclocked gpu are faster then stock NV GPUs. Its going to lead to more sales. Imagine if Nvidia could put a pentium to a 6900 and claim that their overclock 3090sil with an 10900k is better. AMD needs to be held accountable towards this marketing.

Yeah well but that's *two* $1500 cards beating *one* much lower priced card... 

 

In short, I do hope you don't work in marketing...! 😅

The direction tells you... the direction

-Scott Manley, 2021

 

Softwares used:

Corsair Link (Anime Edition) 

MSI Afterburner 

OpenRGB

Lively Wallpaper 

OBS Studio

Shutter Encoder

Avidemux

FSResizer

Audacity 

VLC

WMP

GIMP

HWiNFO64

Paint

3D Paint

GitHub Desktop 

Superposition 

Prime95

Aida64

GPUZ

CPUZ

Generic Logviewer

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Random_Person1234 said:

The graph shows average FPS.

 

It doesn't help when they don't tell us what game mode and map was being played on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

SOURCE: AMD.COM

Are you kiddin me?! 😂

| CPU: Core i7-8700K @ 4.89ghz - 1.21v  Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z370-E GAMING  CPU Cooler: Corsair H100i V2 |
| GPU: MSI RTX 3080Ti Ventus 3X OC  RAM: 32GB T-Force Delta RGB 3066mhz |
| Displays: Acer Predator XB270HU 1440p Gsync 144hz IPS Gaming monitor | Oculus Quest 2 VR

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Falkentyne said:

 

It doesn't help when they don't tell us what game mode and map was being played on.

They weren't playing the game, they were benchmarking. Playing the game gives wildly differing scores between runs, to the point of being utterly worthless for benchmarking.

CPURyzen 7 5800X Cooler: Arctic Liquid Freezer II 120mm AIO with push-pull Arctic P12 PWM fans RAM: G.Skill Ripjaws V 4x8GB 3600 16-16-16-30

MotherboardASRock X570M Pro4 GPUASRock RX 5700 XT Reference with Eiswolf GPX-Pro 240 AIO Case: Antec P5 PSU: Rosewill Capstone 750M

Monitor: ASUS ROG Strix XG32VC Case Fans: 2x Arctic P12 PWM Storage: HP EX950 1TB NVMe, Mushkin Pilot-E 1TB NVMe, 2x Constellation ES 2TB in RAID1

https://hwbot.org/submission/4497882_btgbullseye_gpupi_v3.3___32b_radeon_rx_5700_xt_13min_37sec_848ms

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Spotty said:

 

I checked all the games and resolutions and it seems to only be in Forza Horizon 4 and Battlefield V at 1440p, with the RTX3090 and often the RTX3080 beating them in other games and at 4k. I wonder if there's something special going on with those games that attributes to such a huge performance boost for the AMD cards.

 

I would assume if special optimization of the game, at least FH4. It's MS/Xbox title so it must be pretty well optimized to run as well on RDNA2 as it can so experience is good on Xbox series.

 

I will go as far as guessing that games, that will be ports from consoles will run better on this generation AMD graphics just because setup will be more similar.

PC: R7 5800X, AMD RX480 4GB, 32 GB RAM, 1TB 970 EVO, 500 GB 860 EVO, 500 GB HDD, RM 750 PSU

Laptop: Lenovo Ideapad 510s 14":  i5 7200U, 8 GB RAM, 500 GB 860 EVO

Phone: Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 4G

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

So this is the most I can give you.

2560x1440 max settings, Ultra, 100% render scale, DirectX raytracing enabled.

 

At stock settings and stock power limit on RTX 3090 FE (I assume 350W) I averaged 171 FPS on warzone on the first game and 169 fps on the second game (this game was mostly with me being around the Storage Area)

i9-10900k @ 4.7 ghz and RAM At 4400 mhz 2x16 GB, 16-17-17-37 primary timings, AIDA read 68k, write 68k, copy 66.5k, 35.9ns latency (Mind you this AIDA was tested at 5.2 ghz core, 4.8 cache, while my Warzone game was 4.7 ghz core, 4.4 cache).

 

With 400W power limit (114%) and +120 core and +600 memory, I scored 182 fps average (First part around the airport, after I finished the gulag, around the southeastern Farmland)..

Either way, that's way above AMD's 148 FPS average, so AMD's test is completely useless until we know what exactly AMD tested.  Because if there is some sort of "benchmark mode" that someone claimed AMD used, I don't think regular gamers on battle.net have access to it.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×