Jump to content

ryzen 3600 4.4 1.3v overclock

so, i was just dabbling something in overclocking. im not someone who does it normally. actually, my most recent attempt at overclocking using ryzen master made me do a windows reset because it corrupted my bios somehow.

 

anyway, now that is all behind me, i did some ryzen 3600 overclocking.

 

first i tried it at 4.3ghz like gamers nexus did, but i did it at 1.35v instead of their 1.4v. did a cinebench 2.0 run, and no crashing. then i did 4.4, and still no crashing.
so around this time i also was looking at hwinfo and it showed me that the voltage draw was never higher than 1.3, so i changed the voltage to 1.300 at 4.4ghz, did another run, and it ran nicely.

then i did a 4.5ghz OC, and after 2 or 3 seconds cinebench 2.0 crashed. by watching all the vids from jayztwocents, i thought that when your computer crashed, you had hit a limit, so cinebench crashing was new to me. i asked around, and appearently this said that my OC was unstable. so appearently 4.4 ghz on 1.300V was my max. temp is stable at around 70/71*C.

 

now i did some googling around, and it appears that 4.3ghz seems to be the max most people are able to achieve. since im doing 4.4, does that mean my cpu is having better...silicon? or whatever it is.

 

single core performance is 508 btw.

3600OC.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Seems you have a golden sample. Especially for the 3600.

But remember that your oc is only stable if it runs everything you want to run.

Cinebench alone is not a good validation for stability.

 

My 3700X hits 4.4 all-core too without ridiculous voltages, which is more than most people get.

(Seems the top for most is 4.3 all core)

Everything else runs perfectly but the game i play the most recently (Mordhau) is crashing constantly. So i reverted to stock.

 

Imo there is not much to be gained from OCing Ryzen apart from production workloads.

In gaming i didnt really get noticeably higher fps.

If someone did not use reason to reach their conclusion in the first place, you cannot use reason to convince them otherwise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

quitting the application but not the OS is a sign that it's right on the verge of instability. R20 isnt that stressful tho so it doesnt mean very much.

CPU: i7-2600K 4751MHz 1.44V (software) --> 1.47V at the back of the socket Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Extreme4 (BCLK: 103.3MHz) CPU Cooler: Noctua NH-D15 RAM: Adata XPG 2x8GB DDR3 (XMP: 2133MHz 10-11-11-30 CR2, custom: 2203MHz 10-11-10-26 CR1 tRFC:230 tREFI:14000) GPU: Asus GTX 1070 Dual (Super Jetstream vbios, +70(2025-2088MHz)/+400(8.8Gbps)) SSD: Samsung 840 Pro 256GB (main boot drive), Transcend SSD370 128GB PSU: Seasonic X-660 80+ Gold Case: Antec P110 Silent, 5 intakes 1 exhaust Monitor: AOC G2460PF 1080p 144Hz (150Hz max w/ DP, 121Hz max w/ HDMI) TN panel Keyboard: Logitech G610 Orion (Cherry MX Blue) with SteelSeries Apex M260 keycaps Mouse: BenQ Zowie FK1

 

Model: HP Omen 17 17-an110ca CPU: i7-8750H (0.125V core & cache, 50mV SA undervolt) GPU: GTX 1060 6GB Mobile (+80/+450, 1650MHz~1750MHz 0.78V~0.85V) RAM: 8+8GB DDR4-2400 18-17-17-39 2T Storage: HP EX920 1TB PCIe x4 M.2 SSD + Crucial MX500 1TB 2.5" SATA SSD, 128GB Toshiba PCIe x2 M.2 SSD (KBG30ZMV128G) gone cooking externally, 1TB Seagate 7200RPM 2.5" HDD (ST1000LM049-2GH172) left outside Monitor: 1080p 126Hz IPS G-sync

 

Desktop benching:

Cinebench R15 Single thread:168 Multi-thread: 833 

SuperPi (v1.5 from Techpowerup, PI value output) 16K: 0.100s 1M: 8.255s 32M: 7m 45.93s

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×