i3 9100f vs ryzen 5 3600

[KGGaming]

Just now, TofuHaroto said:

And if you want 

You can always watch a video comparing the cpu's in games

Will the 3600 be compatible with a x570 motherboard?

[Haro]

Just now, KGGaming said:

Will the 3600 be compatible with a x570 motherboard?

Yes it will 

[mbntr]

The i3 is a good chip, but it's in a completely different price category, also the i3 10100 would be much better but it isn't out yet.

The Ryzen 5 is a much MUCH faster processor, better single and multi core performance.

[Haro]

1 minute ago, mbntr said:

also the i3 10100 would be much better but it isn't out yet.

Most likely not

It will still be 14nm so I don't expect a big difference in ipc 

And if you want to go for a 3 sky 

Just get the 3300x or the 3100

[SavageNeo]

Just now, mbntr said:

The i3 is a good chip

Depends. 

1 minute ago, mbntr said:

also the i3 10100 would be much better but it isn't out yet.

it would be much better. still the same 14nm architechture, probably 3300x will still beat it.

[mbntr]

1 minute ago, SavageNeo said:

Depends. 

it would be much better. still the same 14nm architechture, probably 3300x will still beat it.

For gaming and for the price OP said it is a good chip, much better than anything amd makes in that price category (except maybe the 1600f if you can find one or the 3100 when discounted), in gaming at least.

the i3 10100 is undeniably better than the i3 9100f, and it should be on par with the 3300x but at a bit lower price (according to intel, it could go up though), it obviously it will be slower than the R5 3600

[Haro]

Just now, mbntr said:

should be on par with the 3300x

That is simply not true 

[SavageNeo]

Just now, mbntr said:

For gaming and for the price OP said it is a good chip, much better than anything amd makes in that price category

Amd doesnt have cpus aroun 70 bucks. but for 20 buck more you can get 3100 which is much better and it has 4 more threads

[mbntr]

Just now, TofuHaroto said:

That is simply not true 

it should be almos on par, similar in performance to a 7700 or a 3100, it's also cheaper, it's a valid alternative if you need an iGPU or want to upgrade in the future to something faster gaming wise

[Haro]

Just now, mbntr said:

it should be almos on par, similar in performance to a 7700 or a 3100, it's also cheaper, it's a valid alternative if you need an iGPU or want to upgrade in the future to something faster gaming wise

No it won't be on par 

First of all : the 3300x has way more ipc than it 

Second of all : the 3300x can utilize way faster memory 

Third : the 3300x will be more efficient which is important imo

[GoldenLag]

Just now, TofuHaroto said:

Second of all : the 3300x can utilize way faster memory 

not true. 

1 minute ago, TofuHaroto said:

First of all : the 3300x has way more ipc than it 

not how performance works on CPUs. so without the clockspeed to back it up its kinda pointless. 

1 minute ago, TofuHaroto said:

Third : the 3300x will be more efficient which is important imo

doesnt really matter when it is performance you want. 

 

 

like the 3100/3300x is likely to be the better buy, but the second statement is just wrong. 

[Haro]

1 minute ago, GoldenLag said:

not how performance works on CPUs. so without the clockspeed to back it up its kinda pointless. 

It can boost to 4.3 if I recall correctly

And for the 10100 I honestly forgot 

[GoldenLag]

4 minutes ago, TofuHaroto said:

It can boost to 4.3 if I recall correctly

And for the 10100 I honestly forgot 

and the 10100 goes to the same clockspeed. 

 

what the end performance will be isnt exactly known. thos IMC on coffeelake is better than the IMC (infinity fabric) than Zen 2. even if the Zen 2 chips atm have great IMCs .

 

edit: tho its unlikely to be worth waiting for intel 10th gen, as we allready know what they will deliver.