Jump to content

Safe Backup Strategy - Does Backblaze protect against bad sectors?

ItsGiusto

I've been a Backblaze customer for several years, but I'm now wondering if this strategy is protecting me against my hard drive developing bad sectors. I think Backblaze keeps versions for only 30 days, so if a portion of the drive becomes unreadable for a long portion of time, then I think I'd only have 1 month to figure it out and respond. For data that I don't check on that often, perhaps this isn't safe, unless Backblaze notifies you if it can't access a sector of your hard drive. I don't know if it does, does anyone else know this?

 

What's a better strategy for (somewhat frugal) long-term maintenance of data I don't want to have to check in on frequently?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe buy another hard drive and back up the data physically yourself?

NEW PC build: Blank Heaven   minimalist white and black PC     Old S340 build log "White Heaven"        The "LIGHTCANON" flashlight build log        Project AntiRoll (prototype)        Custom speaker project

Spoiler

Ryzen 3950X | AMD Vega Frontier Edition | ASUS X570 Pro WS | Corsair Vengeance LPX 64GB | NZXT H500 | Seasonic Prime Fanless TX-700 | Custom loop | Coolermaster SK630 White | Logitech MX Master 2S | Samsung 980 Pro 1TB + 970 Pro 512GB | Samsung 58" 4k TV | Scarlett 2i4 | 2x AT2020

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, ItsGiusto said:

...unless Backblaze notifies you if it can't access a sector of your hard drive. I don't know if it does, does anyone else know this?

As far as I know, their software just backs up data it's able to read from your drives, so if the data becomes unreadable, it'll backup an unreadable file. This is why you should have SMART monitoring software installed to detect when sectors start to become remapped on your drives so you can replace them as soon as possible.

 

10 minutes ago, ItsGiusto said:

What's a better strategy for (somewhat frugal) long-term maintenance of data I don't want to have to check in on frequently?

Um, if you're not checking on your backups regularly, ideally performing a full restore, then you "don't have a backup" - why? Because an untested backup is not a backup. Aside from testing backups, it's best to follow the 3-2-1 Backup Strategy for any mission-critical data you cannot easily reproduce or otherwise recover.

https://www.backblaze.com/blog/the-3-2-1-backup-strategy/

Desktop: KiRaShi-Intel-2022 (i5-12600K, RTX2060) Mobile: OnePlus 5T | Koodo - 75GB Data + Data Rollover for $45/month
Laptop: Dell XPS 15 9560 (the real 15" MacBook Pro that Apple didn't make) Tablet: iPad Mini 5 | Lenovo IdeaPad Duet 10.1
Camera: Canon M6 Mark II | Canon Rebel T1i (500D) | Canon SX280 | Panasonic TS20D Music: Spotify Premium (CIRCA '08)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Enderman said:

Maybe buy another hard drive and back up the data physically yourself?

Yeah, I am doing this now. But I'd rather have a method that's more "set-it-and-forget-it", so I don't have to remember to do this every so often.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

I use backintime on linux. this machine is a mATX with 4 sata ports. I have been buying an extra drive every 2 years so the ages are staggered. I also have different brands of drive. I do not use RAID. I keep each drive separate. Now all the sata ports are used ill prob rotate the drives with a new one when the time comes. I set it to keep daily snapshots. My data requirements are not huge, all my snapshots fit onto a single drive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, kirashi said:

As far as I know, their software just backs up data it's able to read from your drives, so if the data becomes unreadable, it'll backup an unreadable file. This is why you should have SMART monitoring software installed to detect when sectors start to become remapped on your drives so you can replace them as soon as possible.

 

Um, if you're not checking on your backups regularly, ideally performing a full restore, then you "don't have a backup" - why? Because an untested backup is not a backup. Aside from testing backups, it's best to follow the 3-2-1 Backup Strategy for any mission-critical data you cannot easily reproduce or otherwise recover.

https://www.backblaze.com/blog/the-3-2-1-backup-strategy/

Cool, I'm not too familiar with SMART software. It monitors your drives and tells you when things go bad? Do you have a recommendation for a good, free Windows one?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, ItsGiusto said:

Cool, I'm not too familiar with SMART software. It monitors your drives and tells you when things go bad? Do you have a recommendation for a good, free Windows one?

No worries - there are plenty of software options out there to display SMART diagnostics for your drives.

https://www.howtogeek.com/134735/how-to-see-if-your-hard-drive-is-dying/

Desktop: KiRaShi-Intel-2022 (i5-12600K, RTX2060) Mobile: OnePlus 5T | Koodo - 75GB Data + Data Rollover for $45/month
Laptop: Dell XPS 15 9560 (the real 15" MacBook Pro that Apple didn't make) Tablet: iPad Mini 5 | Lenovo IdeaPad Duet 10.1
Camera: Canon M6 Mark II | Canon Rebel T1i (500D) | Canon SX280 | Panasonic TS20D Music: Spotify Premium (CIRCA '08)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, kirashi said:

No worries - there are plenty of software options out there to display SMART diagnostics for your drives.

https://www.howtogeek.com/134735/how-to-see-if-your-hard-drive-is-dying/

Okay, I've read the article and installed CrystalDiskInfo. Sounds like basically, I just watch for notifications from it that my hard drives might be failing? It's good that it already warned me that one of my drives is of questionable quality (it said "Caution").

 

One thing I'm wondering about - If it says that there is a "Reallocated Sector", does that mean that there was data loss? Does it maybe depend on if there was data on that sector? How can I know?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ItsGiusto said:

Okay, I've read the article and installed CrystalDiskInfo. Sounds like basically, I just watch for notifications from it that my hard drives might be failing? It's good that it already warned me that one of my drives is of questionable quality (it said "Caution").

 

One thing I'm wondering about - If it says that there is a "Reallocated Sector", does that mean that there was data loss? Does it maybe depend on if there was data on that sector? How can I know?

Yes, basically SMART can help you detect when a drive is failing. However, know that drives can fail with ZERO warning signs, so you always want to backup. Reallocated sectors are something to watch out for, you can learn more here. https://kb.acronis.com/content/9105

Desktop: KiRaShi-Intel-2022 (i5-12600K, RTX2060) Mobile: OnePlus 5T | Koodo - 75GB Data + Data Rollover for $45/month
Laptop: Dell XPS 15 9560 (the real 15" MacBook Pro that Apple didn't make) Tablet: iPad Mini 5 | Lenovo IdeaPad Duet 10.1
Camera: Canon M6 Mark II | Canon Rebel T1i (500D) | Canon SX280 | Panasonic TS20D Music: Spotify Premium (CIRCA '08)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×