Jump to content

Recently started tuning my memory kit I bought when I built my PC. I'm getting some weird results using the DRAM calculator for Ryzen. The timings work and using Prime95 large ffts and haven't had any issues. Memory stats from thaiphoon are below. Along with the current "stable" timings.

 

Module Manufacturer: Undefined
Module Part Number: Undefined
DRAM Manufacturer: Hynix
DRAM Component: H5AN8G8N??R-UHC*

 

*According to the chips themselves they are H5AN8G8NJJR-VKC I had to remove the heat spreader to look at the chips.*


DRAM Die Revision / Process Node: FFh / Not determined
Module Manufacturing Date: Week 15, 2019
Manufacturing Date Decoded: April 8-12, 2019
Module Serial Number: 0104AA1Bh
Module PCB Revision: 00h
Fundamental Memory Class: DDR4 SDRAM
Module Speed Grade: DDR4-2400R
Base Module Type: UDIMM (133.35 mm)
Module Capacity: 8 GB
Reference Raw Card: A2 (8 layers)
JEDEC Raw Card Designer: SK hynix
Module Nominal Height: 31 H
Module Thickness Maximum, Front: 1 T
Module Thickness Maximum, Back: T
Number of DIMM Ranks: 1
Address Mapping from Edge Connector to DRAM: Standard
DRAM Device Package: Standard Monolithic
DRAM Device Package Type: 78-ball FBGA
DRAM Device Die Count: Single die
Signal Loading: Not specified
Number of Column Addresses: 10 bits
Number of Row Addresses: 16 bits
Number of Bank Addresses: 2 bits (4 banks)
Bank Group Addressing: 2 bits (4 groups)
DRAM Device Width: 8 bits
Programmed DRAM Density: 8 Gb
Calculated DRAM Density: 8 Gb
Number of DRAM components: 8
DRAM Page Size: 1 KB
Primary Memory Bus Width: 64 bits
Memory Bus Width Extension: 0 bits
DRAM Post Package Repair: Supported
Soft Post Package Repair: Supported
Fine Timebase: 0.001 ns
Medium Timebase: 0.125 ns
CAS Latencies Supported:
10T, 11T, 12T, 13T,
14T, 15T, 16T, 17T,
18T
Minimum Clock Cycle Time (tCK min): 0.833 ns (1200.48 MHz)
Maximum Clock Cycle Time (tCK max): 1.600 ns (625.00 MHz)
CAS# Latency Time (tAA min): 13.320 ns
RAS# to CAS# Delay Time (tRCD min): 13.320 ns
Row Precharge Delay Time (tRP min): 13.320 ns
Active to Precharge Delay Time (tRAS min): 32.000 ns
Act to Act/Refresh Delay Time (tRC min): 45.320 ns
Normal Refresh Recovery Delay Time (tRFC1 min): 350.000 ns
2x mode Refresh Recovery Delay Time (tRFC2 min): 260.000 ns
4x mode Refresh Recovery Delay Time (tRFC4 min): 160.000 ns
Short Row Active to Row Active Delay (tRRD_S min): 3.300 ns
Long Row Active to Row Active Delay (tRRD_L min): 4.900 ns
Write Recovery Time (tWR min): 15.000 ns
Short Write to Read Command Delay (tWTR_S min): 2.500 ns
Long Write to Read Command Delay (tWTR_L min): 7.500 ns
Long CAS to CAS Delay Time (tCCD_L min): 5.000 ns
Four Active Windows Delay (tFAW min): 21.000 ns
Maximum Active Window (tMAW): 8192*tREFI
Maximum Activate Count (MAC): Unlimited MAC
DRAM VDD 1.20 V operable/endurant: Yes/Yes
Module Thermal Sensor: Not Incorporated

 

426164326_timings(1).thumb.png.47720e5b48b2517ec217a8577ea87464.png

 

I've been trying to tune the memory at 3466 which is the maximum spec for my motherboard which is a MSI B450 Gaming Plus paired with a Ryzen 5 2600X. These timings below appear to be stable with Prime95 large FFTs and while gaming they just seem really weird to me. 

 

156993045_Annotation2019-12-05001208.thumb.png.bbbc5a7f5670c865cd6565ac1cc80f7b.png

 

Basically I am just looking for some constructive criticism or some knowledge from people on here as I am an amateur. Hell I didn't know what XMP was a year ago.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You're CPU limited here, Zen+ ain't gonna go any higher than 3200MHz with any RAM.

 

Edit: oh, you are stable then, don't you ? What you're asking about then ? If these timings work then use them, what's so weird about them ?

Tag or quote me so i see your reply

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have Hynix CJR too by the way, and DRAM calculator shows rather off values too for me. I've just experimented by myself, lowering them one by one, i'm stable at 3800MHz 1900fClk 2T 16Cl 19RcdRd 16RcdWr 19Rp 34Ras 32Rc 497Rfc with G.SKill 3600MHz 19CL 2x8GB kit on R7 3700X and MSI B450 GP.

Tag or quote me so i see your reply

Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe just raise them to 3466MHz with XMP enabled and see what happens? DRAM calculator didn't exist before Ryzen, and people still managed to tune their memory properly

 

8 minutes ago, Juular said:

Zen+ ain't gonna go any higher than 3200MHz with any RAM.

I have seen someone do 3600MHz with super loose timings or 3466MHz with actually decent timings (16-18-16-36 I think)

CPU: i7-2600K 4751MHz 1.44V (software) --> 1.47V at the back of the socket Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Extreme4 (BCLK: 103.3MHz) CPU Cooler: Noctua NH-D15 RAM: Adata XPG 2x8GB DDR3 (XMP: 2133MHz 10-11-11-30 CR2, custom: 2203MHz 10-11-10-26 CR1 tRFC:230 tREFI:14000) GPU: Asus GTX 1070 Dual (Super Jetstream vbios, +70(2025-2088MHz)/+400(8.8Gbps)) SSD: Samsung 840 Pro 256GB (main boot drive), Transcend SSD370 128GB PSU: Seasonic X-660 80+ Gold Case: Antec P110 Silent, 5 intakes 1 exhaust Monitor: AOC G2460PF 1080p 144Hz (150Hz max w/ DP, 121Hz max w/ HDMI) TN panel Keyboard: Logitech G610 Orion (Cherry MX Blue) with SteelSeries Apex M260 keycaps Mouse: BenQ Zowie FK1

 

Model: HP Omen 17 17-an110ca CPU: i7-8750H (0.125V core & cache, 50mV SA undervolt) GPU: GTX 1060 6GB Mobile (+80/+450, 1650MHz~1750MHz 0.78V~0.85V) RAM: 8+8GB DDR4-2400 18-17-17-39 2T Storage: HP EX920 1TB PCIe x4 M.2 SSD + Crucial MX500 1TB 2.5" SATA SSD, 128GB Toshiba PCIe x2 M.2 SSD (KBG30ZMV128G) gone cooking externally, 1TB Seagate 7200RPM 2.5" HDD (ST1000LM049-2GH172) left outside Monitor: 1080p 126Hz IPS G-sync

 

Desktop benching:

Cinebench R15 Single thread:168 Multi-thread: 833 

SuperPi (v1.5 from Techpowerup, PI value output) 16K: 0.100s 1M: 8.255s 32M: 7m 45.93s

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Juular said:

You're CPU limited here, Zen+ ain't gonna go any higher than 3200MHz with any RAM.

 

Edit: oh, you are stable then, don't you ? What you're asking about then ? If these timings work then use them, what's so weird about them ?

I read a post by Stilts (apparently he's good at this) and he mentioned that the Integrated memory controller on Zen+ can go up to 3533 on a large sample of chips. I guess I'm just wondering about the timings. They seem to be all over the place. 15 18 19 17 at 3466 seems wacky based on my knowledge level. I spose if it works it works then lol.

Link to post
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, Jurrunio said:

Maybe just raise them to 3466MHz with XMP enabled and see what happens? DRAM calculator didn't exist before Ryzen, and people still managed to tune their memory properly

 

I have seen someone do 3600MHz with super loose timings or 3466MHz with actually decent timings (16-18-16-36 I think)

That's what I've done, the 3466 timings are what I've managed after doing some initial tunning on the primary timings. I haven't used the DRAM calculator for that as it doesn't have my JJR die in there anyways. I have been having a lot of fun doing it on my own working from the XMP as a baseline. Just wanted to get some insight from folks who might have more experience than myself. I'd try Reddit, but I've seen how they can treat boobs like myself.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Juular said:

I have Hynix CJR too by the way, and DRAM calculator shows rather off values too for me. I've just experimented by myself, lowering them one by one, i'm stable at 3800MHz 1900fClk 2T 16Cl 19RcdRd 16RcdWr 19Rp 34Ras 32Rc 497Rfc with G.SKill 3600MHz 19CL 2x8GB kit on R7 3700X and MSI B450 GP.

I wish I could tune the infinity fabric but I can't justify upgrading my processor at the moment. So your gaming plus is handling those timings well? Is it the Max version or the original?.

Link to post
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, jackoneill1984 said:

That's what I've done, the 3466 timings are what I've managed after doing some initial tunning on the primary timings. I haven't used the DRAM calculator for that as it doesn't have my JJR die in there anyways. I have been having a lot of fun doing it on my own working from the XMP as a baseline. Just wanted to get some insight from folks who might have more experience than myself. I'd try Reddit, but I've seen how they can treat boobs like myself.

From a bit of Chinese review, seems like JJR is a straight downgrade from CJR even though JJR is supposedly the successor of CJR. It's a bit worse on Intel (1-2 ticks worse for the same frequency and voltage) and much worse on AMD (with 1st gen, cannot go past 3400 no matter what while the same CPU can do 3533 with good CJR). Good samples of JJR can still do 3600MHz 16-19-19-39 on 3rd gen AMD though so let's say most people won't spot the difference.

CPU: i7-2600K 4751MHz 1.44V (software) --> 1.47V at the back of the socket Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Extreme4 (BCLK: 103.3MHz) CPU Cooler: Noctua NH-D15 RAM: Adata XPG 2x8GB DDR3 (XMP: 2133MHz 10-11-11-30 CR2, custom: 2203MHz 10-11-10-26 CR1 tRFC:230 tREFI:14000) GPU: Asus GTX 1070 Dual (Super Jetstream vbios, +70(2025-2088MHz)/+400(8.8Gbps)) SSD: Samsung 840 Pro 256GB (main boot drive), Transcend SSD370 128GB PSU: Seasonic X-660 80+ Gold Case: Antec P110 Silent, 5 intakes 1 exhaust Monitor: AOC G2460PF 1080p 144Hz (150Hz max w/ DP, 121Hz max w/ HDMI) TN panel Keyboard: Logitech G610 Orion (Cherry MX Blue) with SteelSeries Apex M260 keycaps Mouse: BenQ Zowie FK1

 

Model: HP Omen 17 17-an110ca CPU: i7-8750H (0.125V core & cache, 50mV SA undervolt) GPU: GTX 1060 6GB Mobile (+80/+450, 1650MHz~1750MHz 0.78V~0.85V) RAM: 8+8GB DDR4-2400 18-17-17-39 2T Storage: HP EX920 1TB PCIe x4 M.2 SSD + Crucial MX500 1TB 2.5" SATA SSD, 128GB Toshiba PCIe x2 M.2 SSD (KBG30ZMV128G) gone cooking externally, 1TB Seagate 7200RPM 2.5" HDD (ST1000LM049-2GH172) left outside Monitor: 1080p 126Hz IPS G-sync

 

Desktop benching:

Cinebench R15 Single thread:168 Multi-thread: 833 

SuperPi (v1.5 from Techpowerup, PI value output) 16K: 0.100s 1M: 8.255s 32M: 7m 45.93s

Link to post
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Jurrunio said:

From a bit of Chinese review, seems like JJR is a straight downgrade from CJR even though JJR is supposedly the successor of CJR. It's a bit worse on Intel (1-2 ticks worse for the same frequency and voltage) and much worse on AMD (with 1st gen, cannot go past 3400 no matter what while the same CPU can do 3533 with good CJR). Good samples of JJR can still do 3600MHz 16-19-19-39 on 3rd gen AMD though so let's say most people won't spot the difference.

 Thank you! This is something I didn't find on my own. Most things I found said it was the same as but that didn't jive with my testing. Even if it is a sample of one.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • 4 weeks later...

Hey this tread helps a lot for me, I have Team Night Hawk RGB 3200 MHZ kit which also label at DRAM Manufacturer: Hynix; DRAM Component: H5AN8G8N??R-UHC*; in thaiphoon burner reported me. Then i read your topic here and try to with the Hynix-CJR memory timings on Dram Calculator.

Last weekend i am into memory tuning and i have manage to get my memory 3600 MHZ stable 1T Command Rate 16-18-18-19-38-56- (tRFC)548 @1.4V Dram voltage and 1.1V SOC voltage with 48ohms procODT on MSI B350 Tomahawk with Ryzen 1600AF @4.0GHz. Could Manage to post and boot into system between 1.37-139V  but giving me read or write errors. I could have slightly better timings with 3466 MHZ with even lower voltages like 1.36V. I would upload pictures after i am back home. (sorry for my language if i did any grammer mistakes, because it isnt my native language.)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Today i found this topic on the web which helps a lot.

I was trying set the SOC lover than 1.1V but getting errors, after i read this topic i set my SOC first 1.025V than test for errors, do 3 cinebench runs get the best score 1098, then , set SOC 1.0125V test for errors, do 3 cinebench runs and get the best 1115 score feels good. (best cinebench score @1.1V SOC was 1076). 

Edit: After some research i found that my R15 scores are pretty low. I did swap my CPU Ryzen 2400G to Ryzen 5 1600 AF old cinebench still thinks that i am on 4 cores 8 threads, lol i never try to check how many threads working on cinebench my fault sorry. After that i reinstall the R15 and make a quick test giving me score around 1384 points.

 

Edited by soulclick
Software issued wrong results on Cinebench R15 results
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×