Jump to content

Why is my GPU performing worse than everyone else?

I just purchased the GTX 1660 Super AERO ITX series : https://www.msi.com/Graphics-card/GeForce-GTX-1660-SUPER-AERO-ITX

 

Then I did some tests and found out, that it performs significantly worse than similar card: https://www.passmark.com/baselines/V9/display.php?id=130255811950

 

The average is above 11000, mine performs at just 9500.

 

My display does not allow 4k resolution though, and my PSU is the Corsair RM1000x

 

What may be causing this, should I RMA?

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Sophrosyne said:

I just purchased the GTX 1660 Super AERO ITX series : https://www.msi.com/Graphics-card/GeForce-GTX-1660-SUPER-AERO-ITX

 

Then I did some tests and found out, that it performs significantly worse than similar card: https://www.passmark.com/baselines/V9/display.php?id=130255811950

 

The average is above 11000, mine performs at just 9500.

 

My display does not allow 4k resolution though, and my PSU is the Corsair RM1000x

 

What may be causing this, should I RMA?

You went with a poor cooled GPU and you have an overkill PSU.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Which CPU?

M.S.C.E. (M.Sc. Computer Engineering), IT specialist in a hospital, 30+ years of gaming, 20+ years of computer enthusiasm, Geek, Trekkie, anime fan

  • Main PC: AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D - EK AIO 360 D-RGB - Arctic Cooling MX-4 - Asus Prime X570-P - 4x8GB DDR4 3200 HyperX Fury CL16 - Sapphire AMD Radeon 6950XT Nitro+ - 1TB Kingston Fury Renegade - 2TB Kingston Fury Renegade - 512GB ADATA SU800 - 960GB Kingston A400 - Seasonic PX-850 850W  - custom black ATX and EPS cables - Fractal Design Define R5 Blackout - Windows 11 x64 23H2 - 3 Arctic Cooling P14 PWM PST - 5 Arctic Cooling P12 PWM PST
  • Peripherals: LG 32GK650F - Dell P2319h - Logitech G Pro X Superlight with Tiger Ice - HyperX Alloy Origins Core (TKL) - EndGame Gear MPC890 - Genius HF 1250B - Akliam PD4 - Sennheiser HD 560s - Simgot EM6L - Truthear Zero - QKZ x HBB - 7Hz Salnotes Zero - Logitech C270 - Behringer PS400 - BM700  - Colormunki Smile - Speedlink Torid - Jysk Stenderup - LG 24x External DVD writer - Konig smart card reader
  • Laptop: Acer E5–575G-386R 15.6" 1080p (i3 6100U + 12GB DDR4 (4GB+8GB) + GeForce 940MX + 256GB nVME) Win 10 Pro x64 22H2 - Logitech G305 + AAA Lithium battery
  • Networking: Asus TUF Gaming AX6000 - Arcadyan ISP router - 35/5 Mbps vDSL
  • TV and gadgets: TCL 50EP680 50" 4K LED + Sharp HT-SB100 75W RMS soundbar - Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 10.1" - OnePlus 9 256GB - Olymous Cameda C-160 - GameBoy Color 
  • Streaming/Server/Storage PC: AMD Ryzen 5 3600 - LC-Power LC-CC-120 - MSI B450 Tomahawk Max - 2x4GB ADATA 2666 DDR4 - 120GB Kingston V300 - Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB - Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB - 2x WD Green 2TB - Sapphire Pulse AMD Radeon R9 380X - 550W EVGA G3 SuperNova - Chieftec Giga DF-01B - White Shark Spartan X keyboard - Roccat Kone Pure Military Desert strike - Logitech S-220 - Philips 226L
  • Livingroom PC (dad uses): AMD FX 8300 - Arctic Freezer 64 - Asus M5A97 R2.0 Evo - 2x4GB DDR3 1833 Kingston - MSI Radeon HD 7770 1GB OC - 120GB Adata SSD - 500W Fractal Design Essence - DVD-RW - Samsung SM 2253BW - Logitech G710+ - wireless vertical mouse - MS 2.0 speakers
Link to post
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Sophrosyne said:

Then I did some tests and found out, that it performs significantly worse than similar card: https://www.passmark.com/baselines/V9/display.php?id=130255811950

 

The average is above 11000, mine performs at just 9500.

Small cooler and bad load temperatures.

CPU: Intel Core i7-950 Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD3R CPU Cooler: NZXT HAVIK 140 RAM: Corsair Dominator DDR3-1600 (1x2GB), Crucial DDR3-1600 (2x4GB), Crucial Ballistix Sport DDR3-1600 (1x4GB) GPU: ASUS GeForce GTX 770 DirectCU II 2GB SSD: Samsung 860 EVO 2.5" 1TB HDDs: WD Green 3.5" 1TB, WD Blue 3.5" 1TB PSU: Corsair AX860i & CableMod ModFlex Cables Case: Fractal Design Meshify C TG (White) Fans: 2x Dynamic X2 GP-12 Monitors: LG 24GL600F, Samsung S24D390 Keyboard: Logitech G710+ Mouse: Logitech G502 Proteus Spectrum Mouse Pad: Steelseries QcK Audio: Bose SoundSport In-Ear Headphones

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Sophrosyne said:

The score is the same, when I open the case and turn the fan up 100%

when benchmarking it's usually at 100% even if on auto (or a little lower).

my 2080 benches a little more than average non overclocked cards when benchmarking because of the cooling i have on mine (at least i belive that's why)

mine has 3 smaller fans.

 

Anything i've written between the * and * is not meant to be taken seriously.

keep in mind that helping with problems is hard if you aren't specific and detailed.

i'm also not a professional, (yet) so make sure to personally verify important information as i could be wrong.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Plouffe said:

You went with a poor cooled GPU and you have an overkill PSU.

I just ran the test with an open case and the fan at 100%. The temperature does not exceed 61 degrees.

 

Are you sure this may not be the fault of the card?

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Sophrosyne said:

I just ran the test with an open case and the fan at 100%. The temperature does not exceed 61 degrees.

 

Are you sure this may not be the fault of the card?

In that situation yes unless you see your CPU at 100% load and the card at 50% load.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is possible that out of the box it has more restrictive power limit than other cards due to its size

 

Ex-EX build: Liquidfy C+... R.I.P.

Ex-build:

Meshify C – sold

Ryzen 5 1600x @4.0 GHz/1.4V – sold

Gigabyte X370 Aorus Gaming K7 – sold

Corsair Vengeance LPX 2x8 GB @3200 Mhz – sold

Alpenfoehn Brocken 3 Black Edition – it's somewhere

Sapphire Vega 56 Pulse – ded

Intel SSD 660p 1TB – sold

be Quiet! Straight Power 11 750w – sold

Link to post
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Sophrosyne said:

Can you explain to me how it works? The temperature dicates when it downclocks, but I never exceeded 61 C degrees, so why should it perform worse?

boost clocks can be highly temperature dependant. 

 

the fact opening the sidepanel fixes this points to something limiting clocks. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×