Jump to content

AMD clearly isn’t tired of winning yet… - Threadripper 3970X/3960X Review

After the Ryzen 9 3950X wowed us, AMD’s dropping yet another beastly CPU: The 32-core Threadripper 3970X and 24-core 3960X. Let’s see just how well they rip threads…

 

 

Buy a Threadripper 3970X:
On Amazon: TBD
On Newegg: TBD

 

Buy a Threadripper 3960X:
On Amazon: TBD
On Newegg: TBD

 

Buy a Threadripper 2990WX:
On Amazon: https://lmg.gg/8KVjf
On Newegg: https://geni.us/VSAA

 

Buy a Ryzen 9 3950X:
On Amazon: TBD
On Newegg: TBD

Emily @ LINUS MEDIA GROUP                                  

congratulations on breaking absolutely zero stereotypes - @cs_deathmatch

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Get rekt Intel :P

 

Still, would love to see AMD also compete very closely or outright beat intel with Gaming CPU's in pure performance.

CPU: Intel i7 3930k w/OC & EK Supremacy EVO Block | Motherboard: Asus P9x79 Pro  | RAM: G.Skill 4x4 1866 CL9 | PSU: Seasonic Platinum 1000w Corsair RM 750w Gold (2021)|

VDU: Panasonic 42" Plasma | GPU: Gigabyte 1080ti Gaming OC & Barrow Block (RIP)...GTX 980ti | Sound: Asus Xonar D2X - Z5500 -FiiO X3K DAP/DAC - ATH-M50S | Case: Phantek Enthoo Primo White |

Storage: Samsung 850 Pro 1TB SSD + WD Blue 1TB SSD | Cooling: XSPC D5 Photon 270 Res & Pump | 2x XSPC AX240 White Rads | NexXxos Monsta 80x240 Rad P/P | NF-A12x25 fans |

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, SolarNova said:

Get rekt Intel :P

 

Still, would love to see AMD also compete very closely or outright beat intel with Gaming CPU's in pure performance.

People say that Amd is better in gaming at lower price points because of pricing right?

and that intel beats AMD at the high end, but, at higher resolutions doesent amd close the gap?

correct me if i'm wrong  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

spacer.pngimage.thumb.png.b821a5c20a6f14e02f44fba6994ab6b0.png

Tell me if I'm wrong but i'm 99.999% sure that you can't just chop lanes down like that. It's still 8 lanes to the CPU but it has the bandwidth of 4.

Main Gaming PC - i9 10850k @ 5GHz - EVGA XC Ultra 2080ti with Heatkiller 4 - Asrock Z490 Taichi - Corsair H115i - 32GB GSkill Ripjaws V 3600 CL16 OC'd to 3733 - HX850i - Samsung NVME 256GB SSD - Samsung 3.2TB PCIe 8x Enterprise NVMe - Toshiba 3TB 7200RPM HD - Lian Li Air

 

Proxmox Server - i7 8700k @ 4.5Ghz - 32GB EVGA 3000 CL15 OC'd to 3200 - Asus Strix Z370-E Gaming - Oracle F80 800GB Enterprise SSD, LSI SAS running 3 4TB and 2 6TB (Both Raid Z0), Samsung 840Pro 120GB - Phanteks Enthoo Pro

 

Super Server - i9 7980Xe @ 4.5GHz - 64GB 3200MHz Cl16 - Asrock X299 Professional - Nvidia Telsa K20 -Sandisk 512GB Enterprise SATA SSD, 128GB Seagate SATA SSD, 1.5TB WD Green (Over 9 years of power on time) - Phanteks Enthoo Pro 2

 

Laptop - 2019 Macbook Pro 16" - i7 - 16GB - 512GB - 5500M 8GB - Thermal Pads and Graphite Tape modded

 

Smart Phones - iPhone X - 64GB, AT&T, iOS 13.3 iPhone 6 : 16gb, AT&T, iOS 12 iPhone 4 : 16gb, AT&T Go Phone, iOS 7.1.1 Jailbroken. iPhone 3G : 8gb, AT&T Go Phone, iOS 4.2.1 Jailbroken.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

No thread for "Intel’s behavior is PATHETIC – Core i9 10980XE Review"?

 

 

Brands I wholeheartedly reccomend (though do have flawed products): Apple, Razer, Corsair, Asus, Gigabyte, bequiet!, Noctua, Fractal, GSkill (RAM only)

Wall Of Fame (Informative people/People I like): @Glenwing @DrMacintosh @Schnoz @TempestCatto @LogicalDrm @Dan Castellaneta

Useful threads: 

How To Make Your Own Cloud Storage

Spoiler

 

Guide to Display Cables/Adapters

Spoiler

 

PSU Tier List (Latest)-

Spoiler

 

 

Main PC: See spoiler tag

Laptop: 2020 iPad Pro 12.9" with Magic Keyboard

Spoiler

PCPartPicker Part List: https://pcpartpicker.com/list/gKh8zN

CPU: AMD Ryzen 9 3900X 3.8 GHz 12-Core OEM/Tray Processor  (Purchased For $419.99) 
Motherboard: Asus ROG Crosshair VIII Formula ATX AM4 Motherboard  (Purchased For $356.99) 
Memory: G.Skill Trident Z RGB 32 GB (2 x 16 GB) DDR4-3000 Memory  (Purchased For $130.00) 
Storage: Kingston Predator 240 GB M.2-2280 NVME Solid State Drive  (Purchased For $40.00) 
Storage: Crucial MX300 1.05 TB 2.5" Solid State Drive  (Purchased For $100.00) 
Storage: Western Digital Red 8 TB 3.5" 5400RPM Internal Hard Drive  (Purchased For $180.00) 
Video Card: Gigabyte GeForce RTX 2070 8 GB WINDFORCE Video Card  (Purchased For $370.00) 
Case: Fractal Design Define R6 USB-C ATX Mid Tower Case  (Purchased For $100.00) 
Power Supply: Corsair RMi 1000 W 80+ Gold Certified Fully Modular ATX Power Supply  (Purchased For $120.00) 
Optical Drive: Asus DRW-24B1ST/BLK/B/AS DVD/CD Writer  (Purchased For $75.00) 
Total: $1891.98
Prices include shipping, taxes, and discounts when available
Generated by PCPartPicker 2020-04-02 19:59 EDT-0400

身のなわたしはる果てぞ  悲しわたしはかりけるわたしは

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Arlodog said:

People say that Amd is better in gaming at lower price points because of pricing right?

and that intel beats AMD at the high end, but, at higher resolutions doesent amd close the gap?

correct me if i'm wrong  

3600 has no competition for gaming. That's cause the 9600k and 9400f have one big flaw which is their lack of hyperthreading, meaning they stutter in some titles, and that will only get worse as time goes on. The 3600 doesn't have those issues.

 

So yes, at lower price points AMD can't be beaten.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Hunter259 said:

Tell me if I'm wrong but i'm 99.999% sure that you can't just chop lanes down like that. It's still 16 lanes to the CPU but it has the bandwidth of 8.

its because it isnt chopping lanes. those lanes are provided by the chipset. 

 

transfered by those 8 lanes to the CPU. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, SenKa said:

No thread for "Intel’s behavior is PATHETIC – Core i9 10980XE Review"?

 

 

I was wondering the exact same thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

I feel spoiled with 3 videos in less than 24 hours

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, GoldenLag said:

its because it isnt chopping lanes. those lanes are provided by the chipset. 

 

transfered by those 8 lanes to the CPU. 

My question is more of how is the chipset functioning. You can't just combine lanes unless that is something new. That should be half the bandwidth as you have half the lanes to the CPU than the drives want.

Main Gaming PC - i9 10850k @ 5GHz - EVGA XC Ultra 2080ti with Heatkiller 4 - Asrock Z490 Taichi - Corsair H115i - 32GB GSkill Ripjaws V 3600 CL16 OC'd to 3733 - HX850i - Samsung NVME 256GB SSD - Samsung 3.2TB PCIe 8x Enterprise NVMe - Toshiba 3TB 7200RPM HD - Lian Li Air

 

Proxmox Server - i7 8700k @ 4.5Ghz - 32GB EVGA 3000 CL15 OC'd to 3200 - Asus Strix Z370-E Gaming - Oracle F80 800GB Enterprise SSD, LSI SAS running 3 4TB and 2 6TB (Both Raid Z0), Samsung 840Pro 120GB - Phanteks Enthoo Pro

 

Super Server - i9 7980Xe @ 4.5GHz - 64GB 3200MHz Cl16 - Asrock X299 Professional - Nvidia Telsa K20 -Sandisk 512GB Enterprise SATA SSD, 128GB Seagate SATA SSD, 1.5TB WD Green (Over 9 years of power on time) - Phanteks Enthoo Pro 2

 

Laptop - 2019 Macbook Pro 16" - i7 - 16GB - 512GB - 5500M 8GB - Thermal Pads and Graphite Tape modded

 

Smart Phones - iPhone X - 64GB, AT&T, iOS 13.3 iPhone 6 : 16gb, AT&T, iOS 12 iPhone 4 : 16gb, AT&T Go Phone, iOS 7.1.1 Jailbroken. iPhone 3G : 8gb, AT&T Go Phone, iOS 4.2.1 Jailbroken.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Hunter259 said:

My question is more of how is the chipset functioning. You can't just combine lanes unless that is something new.

its not combining or splitting any lanes. 

 

its generating its own lanes to run on. then using the connecting itself to the CPU using 8 lanes. 

and combining PCIe lanes sort of happens when you split them. 

 

this isnt something new. x570 works the same way, the whole AM4 socket. 1151 and 1154, 2011, TR4, 3467. and many many more boards that have south bridges. otherwise known as the chipset. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, GoldenLag said:

its not combining or splitting any lanes. 

 

its generating its own lanes to run on. then using the connecting itself to the CPU using 8 lanes. 

and combining PCIe lanes sort of happens when you split them. 

 

this isnt something new. x570 works the same way, the whole AM4 socket. 1151 and 1154, 2011, TR4, 3467. and many many more boards that have south bridges. otherwise known as the chipset. 

I understand that. The chipset is basically half a PLX chip. But if your drives run at a PCIe 3 speed then the switch, in this case the chipset, is going to be switching PCIe 3 speeds. Which when running them all in a raid like the picture shows would net you half the bandwidth that would be possible.

Main Gaming PC - i9 10850k @ 5GHz - EVGA XC Ultra 2080ti with Heatkiller 4 - Asrock Z490 Taichi - Corsair H115i - 32GB GSkill Ripjaws V 3600 CL16 OC'd to 3733 - HX850i - Samsung NVME 256GB SSD - Samsung 3.2TB PCIe 8x Enterprise NVMe - Toshiba 3TB 7200RPM HD - Lian Li Air

 

Proxmox Server - i7 8700k @ 4.5Ghz - 32GB EVGA 3000 CL15 OC'd to 3200 - Asus Strix Z370-E Gaming - Oracle F80 800GB Enterprise SSD, LSI SAS running 3 4TB and 2 6TB (Both Raid Z0), Samsung 840Pro 120GB - Phanteks Enthoo Pro

 

Super Server - i9 7980Xe @ 4.5GHz - 64GB 3200MHz Cl16 - Asrock X299 Professional - Nvidia Telsa K20 -Sandisk 512GB Enterprise SATA SSD, 128GB Seagate SATA SSD, 1.5TB WD Green (Over 9 years of power on time) - Phanteks Enthoo Pro 2

 

Laptop - 2019 Macbook Pro 16" - i7 - 16GB - 512GB - 5500M 8GB - Thermal Pads and Graphite Tape modded

 

Smart Phones - iPhone X - 64GB, AT&T, iOS 13.3 iPhone 6 : 16gb, AT&T, iOS 12 iPhone 4 : 16gb, AT&T Go Phone, iOS 7.1.1 Jailbroken. iPhone 3G : 8gb, AT&T Go Phone, iOS 4.2.1 Jailbroken.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Hunter259 said:

Which when running them all in a raid like the picture shows would net you half the bandwidth that would be possible.

the speed link between the chipset and CPU never changes. 

 

only the chipset to device speed changes. 

 

as i said, those are seperate lanes. they toggle themselves. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, GoldenLag said:

the speed link between the chipset and CPU never changes. 

 

only the chipset to device speed changes. 

 

as i said, those are seperate lanes. they toggle themselves. 

The data that is going across that link is slower than the link's maximum bandwidth. So the chipset is switching all this PCIe 3 info and putting it on the PCIe 4 bus but the data is still going to be PCIe 3 speed. You can't just magically make it go faster. The fastest those drives together can deliver data to the bus is ~8GB/s.

Main Gaming PC - i9 10850k @ 5GHz - EVGA XC Ultra 2080ti with Heatkiller 4 - Asrock Z490 Taichi - Corsair H115i - 32GB GSkill Ripjaws V 3600 CL16 OC'd to 3733 - HX850i - Samsung NVME 256GB SSD - Samsung 3.2TB PCIe 8x Enterprise NVMe - Toshiba 3TB 7200RPM HD - Lian Li Air

 

Proxmox Server - i7 8700k @ 4.5Ghz - 32GB EVGA 3000 CL15 OC'd to 3200 - Asus Strix Z370-E Gaming - Oracle F80 800GB Enterprise SSD, LSI SAS running 3 4TB and 2 6TB (Both Raid Z0), Samsung 840Pro 120GB - Phanteks Enthoo Pro

 

Super Server - i9 7980Xe @ 4.5GHz - 64GB 3200MHz Cl16 - Asrock X299 Professional - Nvidia Telsa K20 -Sandisk 512GB Enterprise SATA SSD, 128GB Seagate SATA SSD, 1.5TB WD Green (Over 9 years of power on time) - Phanteks Enthoo Pro 2

 

Laptop - 2019 Macbook Pro 16" - i7 - 16GB - 512GB - 5500M 8GB - Thermal Pads and Graphite Tape modded

 

Smart Phones - iPhone X - 64GB, AT&T, iOS 13.3 iPhone 6 : 16gb, AT&T, iOS 12 iPhone 4 : 16gb, AT&T Go Phone, iOS 7.1.1 Jailbroken. iPhone 3G : 8gb, AT&T Go Phone, iOS 4.2.1 Jailbroken.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Hunter259 said:

The fastest those drives together can deliver data to the bus is ~8GB/s.

are you reffering to the PCIe link between the CPU and chipset?

 

if so. that will gladly accept any data the lanes that the chipset generates. it should run at the full 8x 4.0 speed if the chipset is connected to 16 lanes wort of m.2. 

 

 

someone with x570 could probably confirm this if they have 2 3.0 high speed m.2 drives, tho that is usually not all that common. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, yingste said:

Floatplane down for anyone else right now? I just get the Cloadflare host error page

Same here and I really wanna watch the review.

I'm getting a 522 error.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Hunter259 said:

The data that is going across that link is slower than the link's maximum bandwidth. So the chipset is switching all this PCIe 3 info and putting it on the PCIe 4 bus but the data is still going to be PCIe 3 speed. You can't just magically make it go faster. The fastest those drives together can deliver data to the bus is ~8GB/s.

 

Think of it this way. I have a network switch, with 4x 1gb client connections and 1x 10 gb server connection. All 4 clients can get the full 1 gb from the server as the switch merges the traffic on to the 1x 10gb. This is analogous to what the chipset does.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, hiitswilliam said:

I feel spoiled with 3 videos in less than 24 hours

its time for linus to make some money before everyone else posts up a video on the same subject matter

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Watching the video now but before anything else, is there a reason we don't have the thread about the Intel review?

CPU: i7 6950X  |  Motherboard: Asus Rampage V ed. 10  |  RAM: 32 GB Corsair Dominator Platinum Special Edition 3200 MHz (CL14)  |  GPUs: 2x Asus GTX 1080ti SLI 

Storage: Samsung 960 EVO 1 TB M.2 NVME  |  PSU: In Win SIV 1065W 

Cooling: Custom LC 2 x 360mm EK Radiators | EK D5 Pump | EK 250 Reservoir | EK RVE10 Monoblock | EK GPU Blocks & Backplates | Alphacool Fittings & Connectors | Alphacool Glass Tubing

Case: In Win Tou 2.0  |  Display: Alienware AW3418DW  |  Sound: Woo Audio WA8 Eclipse + Focal Utopia Headphones

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why wasn't this compared to the Xeon W 8175X/8275, Xeon 8180/8280, or other moderate core-count Xeons? Cuz isn't that what Linus built for all his editors?

 

 

I get from the opening and conclusion that it's supposed to be informative for us "average Joes", but is the Threadripper not meant for HEDT/workstation customers with workloads beyond 8-16 cores anyway?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

@Results45 linus makes videos that will produce the most amount of eyeballs

 

how long has linus been doing this for?

how much information does linus have through youtube analytics?

how much information and analytics does linus keep in house on the videos he makes?

*pls dont answer the questions, I am not interested. its generally speaking.

 

 

its a business

money is the motive

salaries need to be paid

bills need to be paid

 

so i am sure linus has a general feel of the age range of his viewers and how many of those are interested in or are using 8+ cores.

 

also a lot of info on the kind of content needed for a big splash

 

not sure why linus does one type of video compared to another

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×