Jump to content

Hello,
I was hoping someone could help me understand the difference between these two RTX 2070 supers from the same brand.

There is one called " GeForce® RTX 2070 SUPER™ GAMING OC 3X WHITE 8G " linked below
https://www.gigabyte.com/Graphics-Card/GV-N207SGAMINGOC-WHITE-8GD#kf

and then we have this one which is called " GeForce® RTX 2070 SUPER™ GAMING OC WHITE 8G " linked below aswell
https://www.gigabyte.com/Graphics-Card/GV-N207SGAMINGOC-WHITE-8GC#kf

Now, I'm honestly not an expert whatsoever with graphics cards but I can't tell which one I should be buying.
If it even matters at all, which is where I was hoping someone on this forum could come in and help give me the pros/cons if there are any at all.

Thank you.

 

 

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/1118974-question-regarding-rtx-2070-super/
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

GC seems better on paper with the larger heat distribution plate, but otherwise the two models are very similar

CPU: i7-2600K 4751MHz 1.44V (software) --> 1.47V at the back of the socket Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Extreme4 (BCLK: 103.3MHz) CPU Cooler: Noctua NH-D15 RAM: Adata XPG 2x8GB DDR3 (XMP: 2133MHz 10-11-11-30 CR2, custom: 2203MHz 10-11-10-26 CR1 tRFC:230 tREFI:14000) GPU: Asus GTX 1070 Dual (Super Jetstream vbios, +70(2025-2088MHz)/+400(8.8Gbps)) SSD: Samsung 840 Pro 256GB (main boot drive), Transcend SSD370 128GB PSU: Seasonic X-660 80+ Gold Case: Antec P110 Silent, 5 intakes 1 exhaust Monitor: AOC G2460PF 1080p 144Hz (150Hz max w/ DP, 121Hz max w/ HDMI) TN panel Keyboard: Logitech G610 Orion (Cherry MX Blue) with SteelSeries Apex M260 keycaps Mouse: BenQ Zowie FK1

 

Model: HP Omen 17 17-an110ca CPU: i7-8750H (0.125V core & cache, 50mV SA undervolt) GPU: GTX 1060 6GB Mobile (+80/+450, 1650MHz~1750MHz 0.78V~0.85V) RAM: 8+8GB DDR4-2400 18-17-17-39 2T Storage: HP EX920 1TB PCIe x4 M.2 SSD + Crucial MX500 1TB 2.5" SATA SSD, 128GB Toshiba PCIe x2 M.2 SSD (KBG30ZMV128G) gone cooking externally, 1TB Seagate 7200RPM 2.5" HDD (ST1000LM049-2GH172) left outside Monitor: 1080p 126Hz IPS G-sync

 

Desktop benching:

Cinebench R15 Single thread:168 Multi-thread: 833 

SuperPi (v1.5 from Techpowerup, PI value output) 16K: 0.100s 1M: 8.255s 32M: 7m 45.93s

Link to post
Share on other sites

Seems to be exactly the same, down to the clocks, cooler and dimensions. Not sure why there is a separate SKU. Buy whichever one is cheaper.

 

Edit: slightly different heatsink, so it's not the exact cooler, but it's similar enough that it's not going to make a big difference either way.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Jurrunio said:

GC seems better on paper with the larger heat distribution plate, but otherwise the two models are very similar

Yeah, the similarities is what caught me off guard to the point where I couldn't understand why there was two different versions when the specs are identical.
The only change I could see was one had usb-c and the other didn't.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, tfdawn said:

The only change I could see was one had usb-c and the other didn't.

this is actually a pretty major change, since USB-C is something Nvidia somewhat boast about as the new connector for VR headsets.

CPU: i7-2600K 4751MHz 1.44V (software) --> 1.47V at the back of the socket Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Extreme4 (BCLK: 103.3MHz) CPU Cooler: Noctua NH-D15 RAM: Adata XPG 2x8GB DDR3 (XMP: 2133MHz 10-11-11-30 CR2, custom: 2203MHz 10-11-10-26 CR1 tRFC:230 tREFI:14000) GPU: Asus GTX 1070 Dual (Super Jetstream vbios, +70(2025-2088MHz)/+400(8.8Gbps)) SSD: Samsung 840 Pro 256GB (main boot drive), Transcend SSD370 128GB PSU: Seasonic X-660 80+ Gold Case: Antec P110 Silent, 5 intakes 1 exhaust Monitor: AOC G2460PF 1080p 144Hz (150Hz max w/ DP, 121Hz max w/ HDMI) TN panel Keyboard: Logitech G610 Orion (Cherry MX Blue) with SteelSeries Apex M260 keycaps Mouse: BenQ Zowie FK1

 

Model: HP Omen 17 17-an110ca CPU: i7-8750H (0.125V core & cache, 50mV SA undervolt) GPU: GTX 1060 6GB Mobile (+80/+450, 1650MHz~1750MHz 0.78V~0.85V) RAM: 8+8GB DDR4-2400 18-17-17-39 2T Storage: HP EX920 1TB PCIe x4 M.2 SSD + Crucial MX500 1TB 2.5" SATA SSD, 128GB Toshiba PCIe x2 M.2 SSD (KBG30ZMV128G) gone cooking externally, 1TB Seagate 7200RPM 2.5" HDD (ST1000LM049-2GH172) left outside Monitor: 1080p 126Hz IPS G-sync

 

Desktop benching:

Cinebench R15 Single thread:168 Multi-thread: 833 

SuperPi (v1.5 from Techpowerup, PI value output) 16K: 0.100s 1M: 8.255s 32M: 7m 45.93s

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, badreg said:

Seems to be exactly the same, down to the clocks, cooler and dimensions. Not sure why there is a separate SKU. Buy whichever one is cheaper.

They're priced at basically the same the only difference is 0,15 USD (converted from Danish currency)

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Jurrunio said:

this is actually a pretty major change, since USB-C is something Nvidia somewhat boast about as the new connector for VR headsets.

I do want to try out VR at some point in the future, so keeping that in mind perhaps I should go with the one that has USB-C

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, badreg said:

Get the USB-C one then. It will likely be more useful in the future than a third DisplayPort output.

Makes sense. Thank you very much, both of you for the quick replies. I'll hopefully be purchasing that one tomorrow assuming it's still in stock.. (only one left :()

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×