Jump to content

1080ti power connector question regarding compatibility.

LeonTheLobster

With:

 
and 

Asus - Z97-K/CSM ATX LGA1150 Motherboard

 

+ a 650W powersupply, will the https://www.gigabyte.com/us/Graphics-Card/GV-N108TAORUS-11GD#sp 1080ti aorus gtx graphics card be compatible?

 

I currently have a 1060 g1 gaming 6gb and when looking at the specifications to compare to check for compatability one thing throwing me off is the power connectors, the 1080ti is 8pin*2 and the 1060 is 8pin*1, if my current setup allows for the 8pin*1 will the 8pin*2 work? (also will the 1080ti be compatible with my setup in general, thanks).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

You know the i7 4790K will bottleneck the GTX 1080 Ti outside 4k

 

The hardware itself is compatible as in the CPU and Motherboard, I'm not clear on your question about the 'connector compatibility' you plug your PCI-e power from PSU to the video card and that's it.

 

If you want to know if your PSU is appropriated for a 1080 Ti though we'd need to know it's model to say so, wattage by itself is meaningless.

Personal Desktop":

CPU: Intel Core i7 10700K @5ghz |~| Cooling: bq! Dark Rock Pro 4 |~| MOBO: Gigabyte Z490UD ATX|~| RAM: 16gb DDR4 3333mhzCL16 G.Skill Trident Z |~| GPU: RX 6900XT Sapphire Nitro+ |~| PSU: Corsair TX650M 80Plus Gold |~| Boot:  SSD WD Green M.2 2280 240GB |~| Storage: 1x3TB HDD 7200rpm Seagate Barracuda + SanDisk Ultra 3D 1TB |~| Case: Fractal Design Meshify C Mini |~| Display: Toshiba UL7A 4K/60hz |~| OS: Windows 10 Pro.

Luna, the temporary Desktop:

CPU: AMD R9 7950XT  |~| Cooling: bq! Dark Rock 4 Pro |~| MOBO: Gigabyte Aorus Master |~| RAM: 32G Kingston HyperX |~| GPU: AMD Radeon RX 7900XTX (Reference) |~| PSU: Corsair HX1000 80+ Platinum |~| Windows Boot Drive: 2x 512GB (1TB total) Plextor SATA SSD (RAID0 volume) |~| Linux Boot Drive: 500GB Kingston A2000 |~| Storage: 4TB WD Black HDD |~| Case: Cooler Master Silencio S600 |~| Display 1 (leftmost): Eizo (unknown model) 1920x1080 IPS @ 60Hz|~| Display 2 (center): BenQ ZOWIE XL2540 1920x1080 TN @ 240Hz |~| Display 3 (rightmost): Wacom Cintiq Pro 24 3840x2160 IPS @ 60Hz 10-bit |~| OS: Windows 10 Pro (games / art) + Linux (distro: NixOS; programming and daily driver)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, Princess Cadence said:

You know the i7 4790K will bottleneck the GTX 1080 Ti outside 4k

 

The hardware itself is compatible as in the CPU and Motherboard, I'm not clear on your question about the 'connector compatibility' you plug your PCI-e power from PSU to the video card and that's it.

  

If you want to know if your PSU is appropriated for a 1080 Ti though we'd need to know it's model to say so, wattage by itself is meaningless.

2

 

what graphics card would you recommend as max with my currend CPU? Looking to upgrade as the 1060 doesn't provide constant 144hz for the games I play?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1080ti will not bottleneck outside of 4k IF you have a refresh rate over 60hz. I game on i7 4770k 1080ti at 1440p 144hz and its fine. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, IceCold008 said:

1080ti will not bottleneck outside of 4k IF you have a refresh rate over 60hz. I game on i7 4770k 1080ti at 1440p 144hz and its fine. 

 

does this mean I will also be fine gaming at 1080p 144hz?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

The thing is CPU matters more for high refresh rate like 144hz, the GTX 1060 can do 144hz easy if it has a CPU to back it up and you decrease/adjust graphical settings accordingly.

 

Say your CPU can do a maximum of 90fps... like it's only fast enough to tell the GPU what to draw 90 times per second, if you keep decreasing graphical quality or throw a faster GPU in it your CPU will remain only be capable of telling the GPU what to draw 90 times per second, that's known as a bottleneck.

Personal Desktop":

CPU: Intel Core i7 10700K @5ghz |~| Cooling: bq! Dark Rock Pro 4 |~| MOBO: Gigabyte Z490UD ATX|~| RAM: 16gb DDR4 3333mhzCL16 G.Skill Trident Z |~| GPU: RX 6900XT Sapphire Nitro+ |~| PSU: Corsair TX650M 80Plus Gold |~| Boot:  SSD WD Green M.2 2280 240GB |~| Storage: 1x3TB HDD 7200rpm Seagate Barracuda + SanDisk Ultra 3D 1TB |~| Case: Fractal Design Meshify C Mini |~| Display: Toshiba UL7A 4K/60hz |~| OS: Windows 10 Pro.

Luna, the temporary Desktop:

CPU: AMD R9 7950XT  |~| Cooling: bq! Dark Rock 4 Pro |~| MOBO: Gigabyte Aorus Master |~| RAM: 32G Kingston HyperX |~| GPU: AMD Radeon RX 7900XTX (Reference) |~| PSU: Corsair HX1000 80+ Platinum |~| Windows Boot Drive: 2x 512GB (1TB total) Plextor SATA SSD (RAID0 volume) |~| Linux Boot Drive: 500GB Kingston A2000 |~| Storage: 4TB WD Black HDD |~| Case: Cooler Master Silencio S600 |~| Display 1 (leftmost): Eizo (unknown model) 1920x1080 IPS @ 60Hz|~| Display 2 (center): BenQ ZOWIE XL2540 1920x1080 TN @ 240Hz |~| Display 3 (rightmost): Wacom Cintiq Pro 24 3840x2160 IPS @ 60Hz 10-bit |~| OS: Windows 10 Pro (games / art) + Linux (distro: NixOS; programming and daily driver)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LeonTheLobster said:

 

does this mean I will also be fine gaming at 1080p 144hz?

No because your GPU will be much faster than your CPU, it can draw frames at 1920x1080p super easy so your CPU won't keep pace telling it what to draw enough to reach 144fps on Triple A games for instance.

 

You will max out your CPU and your GPU will have unused potential.

Personal Desktop":

CPU: Intel Core i7 10700K @5ghz |~| Cooling: bq! Dark Rock Pro 4 |~| MOBO: Gigabyte Z490UD ATX|~| RAM: 16gb DDR4 3333mhzCL16 G.Skill Trident Z |~| GPU: RX 6900XT Sapphire Nitro+ |~| PSU: Corsair TX650M 80Plus Gold |~| Boot:  SSD WD Green M.2 2280 240GB |~| Storage: 1x3TB HDD 7200rpm Seagate Barracuda + SanDisk Ultra 3D 1TB |~| Case: Fractal Design Meshify C Mini |~| Display: Toshiba UL7A 4K/60hz |~| OS: Windows 10 Pro.

Luna, the temporary Desktop:

CPU: AMD R9 7950XT  |~| Cooling: bq! Dark Rock 4 Pro |~| MOBO: Gigabyte Aorus Master |~| RAM: 32G Kingston HyperX |~| GPU: AMD Radeon RX 7900XTX (Reference) |~| PSU: Corsair HX1000 80+ Platinum |~| Windows Boot Drive: 2x 512GB (1TB total) Plextor SATA SSD (RAID0 volume) |~| Linux Boot Drive: 500GB Kingston A2000 |~| Storage: 4TB WD Black HDD |~| Case: Cooler Master Silencio S600 |~| Display 1 (leftmost): Eizo (unknown model) 1920x1080 IPS @ 60Hz|~| Display 2 (center): BenQ ZOWIE XL2540 1920x1080 TN @ 240Hz |~| Display 3 (rightmost): Wacom Cintiq Pro 24 3840x2160 IPS @ 60Hz 10-bit |~| OS: Windows 10 Pro (games / art) + Linux (distro: NixOS; programming and daily driver)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LeonTheLobster said:

 

does this mean I will also be fine gaming at 1080p 144hz?

Yea you will be fine. However 1080ti is a powerful card just as powerful as the 2080. Its a good card for high refresh rate monitors. 1440p upwards and 4k. 1080p is still fine but you will lose some of its preformance. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Princess Cadence said:

No because your GPU will be much faster than your CPU, it can draw frames at 1920x1080p super easy so your CPU won't keep pace telling it what to draw enough to reach 144fps on Triple A games for instance.

 

You will max out your CPU and your GPU will have unused potential.

I know what your saying but he can still game at 1080p 144hz but he will lose some of his card protential at that rez. Hes better off going 1440p or 4k. Hell i know people which game at 1080p 144hz on 2080ti lol. And they are fine with it. Yes its a waste but its still fine. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, IceCold008 said:

I know what your saying but he can still game at 1080p 144hz but he will lose some of his card protential at that rez. Hes better off going 1440p or 4k. Hell i know people which game at 1080p 144hz on 2080ti lol. And they are fine with it. Yes its a waste but its still fine. 

 

9 hours ago, Princess Cadence said:

The thing is CPU matters more for high refresh rate like 144hz, the GTX 1060 can do 144hz easy if it has a CPU to back it up and you decrease/adjust graphical settings accordingly.

 

Say your CPU can do a maximum of 90fps... like it's only fast enough to tell the GPU what to draw 90 times per second, if you keep decreasing graphical quality or throw a faster GPU in it your CPU will remain only be capable of telling the GPU what to draw 90 times per second, that's known as a bottleneck.

what is the best gpu that would not be bottlenecked by my cpu?

 

perhaps just a 1080, @icecold008 is your 4790k at 4.0GHZ? also I'm using ddr3 ram...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, LeonTheLobster said:

.

Where are you from?

Personal Desktop":

CPU: Intel Core i7 10700K @5ghz |~| Cooling: bq! Dark Rock Pro 4 |~| MOBO: Gigabyte Z490UD ATX|~| RAM: 16gb DDR4 3333mhzCL16 G.Skill Trident Z |~| GPU: RX 6900XT Sapphire Nitro+ |~| PSU: Corsair TX650M 80Plus Gold |~| Boot:  SSD WD Green M.2 2280 240GB |~| Storage: 1x3TB HDD 7200rpm Seagate Barracuda + SanDisk Ultra 3D 1TB |~| Case: Fractal Design Meshify C Mini |~| Display: Toshiba UL7A 4K/60hz |~| OS: Windows 10 Pro.

Luna, the temporary Desktop:

CPU: AMD R9 7950XT  |~| Cooling: bq! Dark Rock 4 Pro |~| MOBO: Gigabyte Aorus Master |~| RAM: 32G Kingston HyperX |~| GPU: AMD Radeon RX 7900XTX (Reference) |~| PSU: Corsair HX1000 80+ Platinum |~| Windows Boot Drive: 2x 512GB (1TB total) Plextor SATA SSD (RAID0 volume) |~| Linux Boot Drive: 500GB Kingston A2000 |~| Storage: 4TB WD Black HDD |~| Case: Cooler Master Silencio S600 |~| Display 1 (leftmost): Eizo (unknown model) 1920x1080 IPS @ 60Hz|~| Display 2 (center): BenQ ZOWIE XL2540 1920x1080 TN @ 240Hz |~| Display 3 (rightmost): Wacom Cintiq Pro 24 3840x2160 IPS @ 60Hz 10-bit |~| OS: Windows 10 Pro (games / art) + Linux (distro: NixOS; programming and daily driver)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Princess Cadence said:

Where are you from?

new zealand.. ? :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, LeonTheLobster said:

new zealand.. ? :)

I don't know if I'd bother getting a new GPU to stay with a 1080p monitor, but you know if you can afford a 1080 Ti then sure it is a decent investment, it'd be the same as buying a brand new RTX 2080 which I believe cost a lot there.

 

You man not be able to reach 144fps every where due to the CPU yes but have in mind since your CPU is the issue not the GPU you can just max out all graphical settings in-game.

Personal Desktop":

CPU: Intel Core i7 10700K @5ghz |~| Cooling: bq! Dark Rock Pro 4 |~| MOBO: Gigabyte Z490UD ATX|~| RAM: 16gb DDR4 3333mhzCL16 G.Skill Trident Z |~| GPU: RX 6900XT Sapphire Nitro+ |~| PSU: Corsair TX650M 80Plus Gold |~| Boot:  SSD WD Green M.2 2280 240GB |~| Storage: 1x3TB HDD 7200rpm Seagate Barracuda + SanDisk Ultra 3D 1TB |~| Case: Fractal Design Meshify C Mini |~| Display: Toshiba UL7A 4K/60hz |~| OS: Windows 10 Pro.

Luna, the temporary Desktop:

CPU: AMD R9 7950XT  |~| Cooling: bq! Dark Rock 4 Pro |~| MOBO: Gigabyte Aorus Master |~| RAM: 32G Kingston HyperX |~| GPU: AMD Radeon RX 7900XTX (Reference) |~| PSU: Corsair HX1000 80+ Platinum |~| Windows Boot Drive: 2x 512GB (1TB total) Plextor SATA SSD (RAID0 volume) |~| Linux Boot Drive: 500GB Kingston A2000 |~| Storage: 4TB WD Black HDD |~| Case: Cooler Master Silencio S600 |~| Display 1 (leftmost): Eizo (unknown model) 1920x1080 IPS @ 60Hz|~| Display 2 (center): BenQ ZOWIE XL2540 1920x1080 TN @ 240Hz |~| Display 3 (rightmost): Wacom Cintiq Pro 24 3840x2160 IPS @ 60Hz 10-bit |~| OS: Windows 10 Pro (games / art) + Linux (distro: NixOS; programming and daily driver)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Princess Cadence said:

I don't know if I'd bother getting a new GPU to stay with a 1080p monitor, but you know if you can afford a 1080 Ti then sure it is a decent investment, it'd be the same as buying a brand new RTX 2080 which I believe cost a lot there.

 

You man not be able to reach 144fps every where due to the CPU yes but have in mind since your CPU is the issue not the GPU you can just max out all graphical settings in-game.

thanks a lot, sorry for all the trouble but with my current motherboard would it be possible to upgrade to a better cpu in the future?

 

also, since the 1080ti is a lot better than the 1060 6gb, even though I won't get the full performance of the 1080ti I should still get much better performance than with the 1060 6gb. 

 

(I play fortnite and pubg)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, LeonTheLobster said:

also, since the 1080ti is a lot better than the 1060 6gb, even though I won't get the full performance of the 1080ti I should still get much better performance than with the 1060 6gb.

Yes it will improve.

 

16 minutes ago, LeonTheLobster said:

thanks a lot, sorry for all the trouble but with my current motherboard would it be possible to upgrade to a better cpu in the future?

Oh it is perfectly alright, sadly though you already have the best CPU of your platform, don't get me wrong though it should still do alright, but if you feel it's lacking still you'll might wanna wait for Ryzen 2 release before considering upgrading it too.

Personal Desktop":

CPU: Intel Core i7 10700K @5ghz |~| Cooling: bq! Dark Rock Pro 4 |~| MOBO: Gigabyte Z490UD ATX|~| RAM: 16gb DDR4 3333mhzCL16 G.Skill Trident Z |~| GPU: RX 6900XT Sapphire Nitro+ |~| PSU: Corsair TX650M 80Plus Gold |~| Boot:  SSD WD Green M.2 2280 240GB |~| Storage: 1x3TB HDD 7200rpm Seagate Barracuda + SanDisk Ultra 3D 1TB |~| Case: Fractal Design Meshify C Mini |~| Display: Toshiba UL7A 4K/60hz |~| OS: Windows 10 Pro.

Luna, the temporary Desktop:

CPU: AMD R9 7950XT  |~| Cooling: bq! Dark Rock 4 Pro |~| MOBO: Gigabyte Aorus Master |~| RAM: 32G Kingston HyperX |~| GPU: AMD Radeon RX 7900XTX (Reference) |~| PSU: Corsair HX1000 80+ Platinum |~| Windows Boot Drive: 2x 512GB (1TB total) Plextor SATA SSD (RAID0 volume) |~| Linux Boot Drive: 500GB Kingston A2000 |~| Storage: 4TB WD Black HDD |~| Case: Cooler Master Silencio S600 |~| Display 1 (leftmost): Eizo (unknown model) 1920x1080 IPS @ 60Hz|~| Display 2 (center): BenQ ZOWIE XL2540 1920x1080 TN @ 240Hz |~| Display 3 (rightmost): Wacom Cintiq Pro 24 3840x2160 IPS @ 60Hz 10-bit |~| OS: Windows 10 Pro (games / art) + Linux (distro: NixOS; programming and daily driver)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, LeonTheLobster said:

thanks a lot, sorry for all the trouble but with my current motherboard would it be possible to upgrade to a better cpu in the future?

 

also, since the 1080ti is a lot better than the 1060 6gb, even though I won't get the full performance of the 1080ti I should still get much better performance than with the 1060 6gb. 

 

(I play fortnite and pubg)

Hey I have the same CPU so I can provide some useful insight here. I run my 4790k at 4.7Ghz 24/7, and it's pretty capable for my 1080p 144hz monitor. I have an R9 Fury, which is a small amount faster than a 1060, and I can do 60fps minimum with 80-100fps average in most any game. I can only bottleneck in one game, that being black ops 4 (multiplayer AND blackout.) That being said, I reckon anything above a Gtx 1070 would likely bottleneck in a fair few of newer titles. You would still have a great experience, just know you would be getting as little as 50-60% GPU usage in the worst bottleneck scenarios with a 1080 ti. I have to recommend you get a 1080 instead. Especially for 1080p, you won't notice a difference between the two, largely because of a CPU bottleneck.

CPU: INTEL Core i7 4790k @ 4.7Ghz - Cooling: NZXT Kraken X61 - Mobo: Gigabyte Z97X SLI - RAM: 16GB G.Skill Ares 2400mhz - GPU: AMD Sapphire Nitro R9 Fury 4G - Case: Phanteks P350X - PSU: EVGA 750GQ - Storage: WD Black 1TB - Fans: 2x Noctua NF-P14s (Push) / 2x Corsair AF140 (Pull) / 3x Corsair AF120 (Exhaust) - Keyboard: Corsair K70 Cherry MX Red - Mouse: Razer Deathadder Chroma

Bit of an AMD fan I suppose. I don't bias my replies to anything however, I just prefer AMD and their products. Buy whatever the H*CK you want. 

---QUOTE ME OR I WILL LIKELY NOT REPLY---

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Vegetable said:

. I have to recommend you get a 1080 instead.

The problem with recommending a 'normal' GTX 1080 is that the RTX 2070 and RTX 2060 both can provide that performance for competitive pricing and giving you the new Turing features... at least the 1080 Ti being really the same as the Xp gives enough performance boost to stand out.

 

image.png.d1244dac9b6f47b22965b7fa1f7156c8.png

Personal Desktop":

CPU: Intel Core i7 10700K @5ghz |~| Cooling: bq! Dark Rock Pro 4 |~| MOBO: Gigabyte Z490UD ATX|~| RAM: 16gb DDR4 3333mhzCL16 G.Skill Trident Z |~| GPU: RX 6900XT Sapphire Nitro+ |~| PSU: Corsair TX650M 80Plus Gold |~| Boot:  SSD WD Green M.2 2280 240GB |~| Storage: 1x3TB HDD 7200rpm Seagate Barracuda + SanDisk Ultra 3D 1TB |~| Case: Fractal Design Meshify C Mini |~| Display: Toshiba UL7A 4K/60hz |~| OS: Windows 10 Pro.

Luna, the temporary Desktop:

CPU: AMD R9 7950XT  |~| Cooling: bq! Dark Rock 4 Pro |~| MOBO: Gigabyte Aorus Master |~| RAM: 32G Kingston HyperX |~| GPU: AMD Radeon RX 7900XTX (Reference) |~| PSU: Corsair HX1000 80+ Platinum |~| Windows Boot Drive: 2x 512GB (1TB total) Plextor SATA SSD (RAID0 volume) |~| Linux Boot Drive: 500GB Kingston A2000 |~| Storage: 4TB WD Black HDD |~| Case: Cooler Master Silencio S600 |~| Display 1 (leftmost): Eizo (unknown model) 1920x1080 IPS @ 60Hz|~| Display 2 (center): BenQ ZOWIE XL2540 1920x1080 TN @ 240Hz |~| Display 3 (rightmost): Wacom Cintiq Pro 24 3840x2160 IPS @ 60Hz 10-bit |~| OS: Windows 10 Pro (games / art) + Linux (distro: NixOS; programming and daily driver)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Princess Cadence said:

The problem with recommending a 'normal' GTX 1080 is that the RTX 2070 and RTX 2060 both can provide that performance for competitive pricing and giving you the new Turing features... at least the 1080 Ti being really the same as the Xp gives enough performance boost to stand out.

 

 image.png.d1244dac9b6f47b22965b7fa1f7156c8.png

 

What if I buy a 1080ti now instead of a lower end card that won't bottleneck so that in the future I can upgrade my motherboard and cpu to get rid of bottleneck when I have the money?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you are getting a deal on it, it would work. Not sure if the psu stats were posted so can’t say on that. 

 

But at 1080, a 4790k won’t do a whole lot. Used mine with a regular 1080 on pubg, turn the settings down to try and maintain over 100 FPS on all maps. Also better gameplay if you want to win and all. Even at 1440 it struggle as that game isn’t optimized for multi core like some.

 

But if you were to upgrade, that card could do great, especially at 1080p. Which is why I want one to go with my 8700k, can finally play black ops 4 correctly. 

 

I have a lot of video playing pubg on 1440p and 1080 if you’d like to see the quality and gamplay with a 4790k and a regular 1080. 

Main RIg Corsair Air 540, I7 9900k, ASUS ROG Maximus XI Hero, G.Skill Ripjaws 3600 32GB, 3090FE, EVGA 1000G5, Acer Nitro XZ3 2560 x 1440@240hz 

 

Spare RIg Lian Li O11 AIR MINI, I7 4790K, Asus Maximus VI Extreme, G.Skill Ares 2400 32Gb, EVGA 1080ti, 1080sc 1070sc & 1060 SSC, EVGA 850GA, Acer KG251Q 1920x1080@240hz

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mick Naughty said:

If you are getting a deal on it, it would work. Not sure if the psu stats were posted so can’t say on that. 

 

But at 1080, a 4790k won’t do a whole lot. Used mine with a regular 1080 on pubg, turn the settings down to try and maintain over 100 FPS on all maps. Also better gameplay if you want to win and all. Even at 1440 it struggle as that game isn’t optimized for multi core like some.

 

But if you were to upgrade, that card could do great, especially at 1080p. Which is why I want one to go with my 8700k, can finally play black ops 4 correctly. 

 

 I have a lot of video playing pubg on 1440p and 1080 if you’d like to see the quality and gamplay with a 4790k and a regular 1080. 

 

sure, buying for $600usd 6 months old rarely used, I will find out psu stats shortly...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Princess Cadence said:

You know the i7 4790K will bottleneck the GTX 1080 Ti outside 4k

 

The hardware itself is compatible as in the CPU and Motherboard, I'm not clear on your question about the 'connector compatibility' you plug your PCI-e power from PSU to the video card and that's it.

 

If you want to know if your PSU is appropriated for a 1080 Ti though we'd need to know it's model to say so, wattage by itself is meaningless.

the PSU is the NAXN 650W

 

http://www.enermax.com/home.php?fn=eng/product_a1_1_1&lv0=1&lv1=54&no=166

 

will this suffice?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×