RUMOUR: nVidia about to launch GTX 11xx series

[RejZoR]

9 hours ago, leadeater said:

Can't be, XT isn't Pro 

XT is XTREME so it's better than just being a PRO. Everything XTREME is better. Always.

[Stormseeker9]

On 12/21/2018 at 4:52 PM, Morgan MLGman said:

You misunderstand. I'm not talking about releasing lower-tier cards without RT and Tensor cores because this obviously makes sense as even the 2070 is incapable of decently using DXR settings in BF5, let alone the soon-to-be 2060. I'm talking about the naming scheme which is dumb as hell, why not call it a GTX 2000 series? Like a GTX 2050, GTX 2050 Ti, RTX 2060, RTX 2070 and so on? It clearly indicates that this is the same series, just without RTX features. Releasing a lineup looking like this: GTX 1150, GTX 1150Ti, RTX 2060, RTX 2070 will only confuse potential buyers of which well over 90% doesn't know almost anything specific about the lineups.

What do you mean by ‘incapable’ for the 2070? I run BFV on ultra or whatever they name it with  everything switched on (dx12/DXR) and it works like a charm - crystal clear image and steady FPS. (Limited to 60 as only 60hz screen at the moment) 

[Morgan MLGman]

2 hours ago, Stormseeker9 said:

What do you mean by ‘incapable’ for the 2070? I run BFV on ultra or whatever they name it with  everything switched on (dx12/DXR) and it works like a charm - crystal clear image and steady FPS. (Limited to 60 as only 60hz screen at the moment) 

At 1080p? Yeah, possibly, however IMO this card is intended for 1440p gaming and even after the patches it still can't do DXR on anything higher than Ultra and keep an average of 60FPS at the same time:


While it does almost 96FPS average with the same settings but without those features...

[Stormseeker9]

@Morgan MLGman

 

ah right I see what u mean. Yeah still stuck on 1080P.

 

saving up/ waiting for price drops on 1440P G sync IPS preferably widescreen monitors at the moment. €750-1100 at the moment where I live. I was thinking about 4K screen but not sure if a 2070 is up for that task as I believe it was mainly intended for 1440p as you said yourself. 

 

I chose this card as I wanted to build a ‘futureproof’ (Yes shit can change tomorrow) PC. Built my first pc start of this month. Currently only BFV has ray tracing and haven’t been able to experience it myself above 1080P so far. I hope/presume that Ray tracing will be adopted over the next 1-2 years and more AAA titles will be released supporting ray tracing.

 

 

[Morgan MLGman]

Just now, Stormseeker9 said:

ah right I see what u mean. Yeah still stuck on 1080P.

 

saving up/ waiting for price drops on 1440P G sync IPS preferably widescreen monitors at the moment. €750-1100 at the moment where I live. I was thinking about 4K screen but not sure if a 2070 is up for that task as I believe it was mainly intended for 1440p as you said yourself. 

 

I chose this card as I wanted to build a ‘futureproof’ (Yes shit can change tomorrow) PC. Built my first pc start of this month. Currently only BFV has ray tracing and haven’t been able to experience it myself above 1080P so far. I hope/presume that Ray tracing will be adopted over the next 1-2 years and more AAA titles will be released supporting ray tracing.

6

I highly recommend going to 1440p, especially if you can afford to buy a G-Sync monitor, it's a great gaming experience (though very overpriced with Nvidia which pains me a lot because I also want to switch from my 1440p IPS 60Hz panel to a 144Hz IPS G-Sync one).
The quality and smoothness will blow you away when compared to a 60Hz 1080p monitor...

2070 in general is a good card, only the fact that there are two different SKUs in differently priced models (low-end TU106-400 and a higher-end TU106-400A SKU) is a bit weird... The difference is binning so the TU106-400A SKU should reach higher clock speeds at lower voltage.

[FezBoy]

I am split on this issue. I like cheaper options, but two series simultaneously would be stupid. I'll probably just wait for the 30 series anyways.

[Stormseeker9]

2 hours ago, Morgan MLGman said:

I highly recommend going to 1440p, especially if you can afford to buy a G-Sync monitor, it's a great gaming experience (though very overpriced with Nvidia which pains me a lot because I also want to switch from my 1440p IPS 60Hz panel to a 144Hz IPS G-Sync one).
The quality and smoothness will blow you away when compared to a 60Hz 1080p monitor...

2070 in general is a good card, only the fact that there are two different SKUs in differently priced models (low-end TU106-400 and a higher-end TU106-400A SKU) is a bit weird... The difference is binning so the TU106-400A SKU should reach higher clock speeds at lower voltage.

Mine should run at 1610mhz out of box. Doesn’t run above 1410mhz so far. My first RTX 2070 ran stable under medium to heavy workload around 1950mhz.  Haven’t tinkered with Afterburner or X1 yet on this card, but somehow weird that it’s not running the MSI OC @ 1610mhz but stock 1410mhz. After Christmas when I’m back home I’ll start tinkering again. 

[ZacoAttaco]

Does this mean NVIDIA would directly compete with AMD's budget line of GPUs?

[mr moose]

2 hours ago, ZacoAttaco said:

Does this mean NVIDIA would directly compete with AMD's budget line of GPUs?

They already do. I don't understand?

[Peskanova]

On 12/23/2018 at 10:07 PM, ZacoAttaco said:

Does this mean NVIDIA would directly compete with AMD's budget line of GPUs?

Well , budget wise the 1050ti was king for a while till crypto mining hype ended, now its better a 580/570 for 200$/€ but when 580 was at 300/320 best budget was to slap a 1050ti with a 6500/7500/8400 and have a 1080p 60fps machine for 600/700$

[Morgan MLGman]

10 minutes ago, Peskanova said:

Well , budget wise the 1050ti was king for a while till crypto mining hype ended, now its better a 580/570 for 200$/€ but when 580 was at 300/320 best budget was to slap a 1050ti with a 6500/7500/8400 and have a 1080p 60fps machine for 600/700$

At the moment the 1050Ti is more expensive than the a lot faster RX 570.

[Peskanova]

5 minutes ago, Morgan MLGman said:

At the moment the 1050Ti is more expensive than the a lot faster RX 570.

Now yes , but when gpu mining was on his peak I could sell my 480 for 100$ more than I bought new , and 570 were 200$ like

[mr moose]

11 hours ago, Morgan MLGman said:

At the moment the 1050Ti is more expensive than the a lot faster RX 570.

That's because I hear a rumour that the XX50 series only exists to keep the XX60's priced higher. 

[sYNTHwAVE]

its definately time for all 10 series owners to wait. as an enthusiast i really want to have the best card but, it cannot be justified at the moment. i will keep my 1080ti and see how the market behaves in 2019, i think AMD might have something disruptive up their sleeves. if they ignore raytracing completely they might be able to make a card with traditional deferred rendering performance similar or better than 2080ti for cheaper.

[GoodBytes]

18 minutes ago, VegetableStu said:

1160 confirmed ._. I think I'll wait for RTX 40 series now ._.

I am just waiting for the always being delayed Volta.

 

Nvidia Roadmap:

 

Notice, that Pascal (10 series) doesn't exists on this old road map.

Then:

Volta disappears:

 

Then Volta is back:

 

And now:

We have Turing between Pascal and Volta (well Volta is technically released under Titan V.. and I don't recall Nvidia showing any roadmap picture this time. But I am talking about GeForce line with Volta... I guess this architecture doesn't deliver the performance expected in gaming yet, and still needs some work.