Trik'Stari

That's the whole point: it's being used to mock this whole "Master Race" - concept in an ironical manner! Your whole post actually serves as an argument why it's a good thing to mock that stuff.

PC Master Race
 
to soon?

In case of fire hazard, break tempered glass.

The screw catches fire? Just take it out - or sorry, I mean

Here's your reminder of official Comcast policy
Oh ffs, age restricted, really?

Data caps for wired internet? I only speak unlimited data for wired internet. 

This is so dumb, if “95% of the customers dont hit 1.2tb” then why implement a data cap? That’s some bs lol

Probably because consoles are far less capable than PC's? Not only in pure performance but flexibility as well.
 
Sure, the new consoles claim to run at 4k, but what kind of graphics settings? I'll take a $1000.00 gaming pc that can run 4k Ultra at 60fps over a console for $500 that's running 4k 60fps at low settings (assuming those claims are at all true and not just BS marketing double speak)
 
Not to mention that I can mod my games, as well as run I don't know how many other programs, at once. I can't run 3 or more different monitors, all doing something, at the same time, whilst playing ultra modded Skyrim SE on my main monitor, on any console.

Show off your RGB builds here!! 
Detailed descriptions welcome!!
 
Best pics will be moved to OP and may change any time. 
Best pics moved to OP will have the most likes on a given page or pages depending on how many are submitted and convo in between.
 
RGB conversation is welcome, But this is not a diagnostics thread. Please find appropriate section of the forum for diag thank you.
 
(Because I don't have RGB. Let's see your's then.)
GO!

Different company, same concept. It is the concept that needs to fail. For mankind's greater good.
 
For starters, they don't pay us enough to use them (in fact, they even want us to pay them at this point). Still, i don't think there's any pecuniary compensation that would render them a net positive. There may be potential in the use of automation and computational power for a wider range of everyday activities. This model just isn't it.

I can't see this being a security issue at all. 
 
This is from the same company that once had an idea to give their delivery drivers access to people's locked doors to leave parcels in a "safe place".

Probably because consoles are far less capable than PC's? Not only in pure performance but flexibility as well.
 
Sure, the new consoles claim to run at 4k, but what kind of graphics settings? I'll take a $1000.00 gaming pc that can run 4k Ultra at 60fps over a console for $500 that's running 4k 60fps at low settings (assuming those claims are at all true and not just BS marketing double speak)
 
Not to mention that I can mod my games, as well as run I don't know how many other programs, at once. I can't run 3 or more different monitors, all doing something, at the same time, whilst playing ultra modded Skyrim SE on my main monitor, on any console.

Supply vs demand, plus the fact that those cards are ridiculously more powerful than the entire consoles you are comparing to.

Multi-monitor-master-race!
 
Seriously, I hate going back to a single screen for anything.

Probably because consoles are far less capable than PC's? Not only in pure performance but flexibility as well.
 
Sure, the new consoles claim to run at 4k, but what kind of graphics settings? I'll take a $1000.00 gaming pc that can run 4k Ultra at 60fps over a console for $500 that's running 4k 60fps at low settings (assuming those claims are at all true and not just BS marketing double speak)
 
Not to mention that I can mod my games, as well as run I don't know how many other programs, at once. I can't run 3 or more different monitors, all doing something, at the same time, whilst playing ultra modded Skyrim SE on my main monitor, on any console.

Multi-monitor-master-race!
 
Seriously, I hate going back to a single screen for anything.

Probably because consoles are far less capable than PC's? Not only in pure performance but flexibility as well.
 
Sure, the new consoles claim to run at 4k, but what kind of graphics settings? I'll take a $1000.00 gaming pc that can run 4k Ultra at 60fps over a console for $500 that's running 4k 60fps at low settings (assuming those claims are at all true and not just BS marketing double speak)
 
Not to mention that I can mod my games, as well as run I don't know how many other programs, at once. I can't run 3 or more different monitors, all doing something, at the same time, whilst playing ultra modded Skyrim SE on my main monitor, on any console.

PCs will always be worth the extra outlay to those want to.
 
Cheaper games, mods, monitoring tools, overclocking, hardware upgrades, longer relevant  lifespan, better backwards compatiblity. The list can go on...

Probably because consoles are far less capable than PC's? Not only in pure performance but flexibility as well.
 
Sure, the new consoles claim to run at 4k, but what kind of graphics settings? I'll take a $1000.00 gaming pc that can run 4k Ultra at 60fps over a console for $500 that's running 4k 60fps at low settings (assuming those claims are at all true and not just BS marketing double speak)
 
Not to mention that I can mod my games, as well as run I don't know how many other programs, at once. I can't run 3 or more different monitors, all doing something, at the same time, whilst playing ultra modded Skyrim SE on my main monitor, on any console.

The only true solution (in the US) is to amend the first amendment to include all generic social media platforms like Facebook, Twitter, Youtube, Instagram, Tik Tok, etc.
 
These companies should not be allowed to be the arbiters of truth.

I could make the same argument about the lockdowns and the deaths that have and will continue to occur from the mass economic ruination that is happening as a direct result of said lockdowns. I could also point out that the MSM has moved the goal post so many times now that one could reasonably make the argument that they cannot be trusted to report accurately or in good faith. First it was a "nothing burger", then "we just need to lock down a few weeks to prevent the hospitals from being overwhelmed" and then it's moved into this vague "Stop the spread!" phase that seems to have the goal of preventing the spread entirely, which is in and of itself entirely unrealistic and misleading in the first place.
 
And this is not even mentioning the completely ridiculous hypocrisy the MSM has displayed when covering certain mass gatherings. Some are apparently harmless, whereas others are "superspreader" events. I'm not going to go in depth here because it is an inherently political spin to the larger subject. The overall point is, censorship powers must always be as heavily curtailed as possible because they will almost always end being used in a political matter.
 
So tell me, who is trustworthy enough to decide what is, and is not, "misinformation"? Because I can't think of a single group or organization on this entire planet that I might trust to do so. Algorithms even less.

Because that is essentially the mindset that drives those kinds of organizations.
 
Censorship is wrong. All this does is make them look more guilty and pathetic, in my eyes.
 
Science and scientists are not a monolith, and do not always agree with one another on a given subject.

??? I'm not talking about US politics. i'm talking in general, and just because a single person may be "middle ground" doesn't mean they are not biased.
 
And just because he was elected president, doesn't mean what i said is wrong. you think the division that social media has harboured in society in the recent years is just going to disappear because there's a new president?

Well, you convinced me.  Calling me dumb definitely proves your point.  Great work.
Not until December 14th.  The Electoral College decides that, not the AP, no matter how much Google and the media may proclaim it to be true.  I'm not going further than that, nor making any statements on the validity of the elections, just declaring the fact that the election isn't over until the EC votes.

I could make the same argument about the lockdowns and the deaths that have and will continue to occur from the mass economic ruination that is happening as a direct result of said lockdowns. I could also point out that the MSM has moved the goal post so many times now that one could reasonably make the argument that they cannot be trusted to report accurately or in good faith. First it was a "nothing burger", then "we just need to lock down a few weeks to prevent the hospitals from being overwhelmed" and then it's moved into this vague "Stop the spread!" phase that seems to have the goal of preventing the spread entirely, which is in and of itself entirely unrealistic and misleading in the first place.
 
And this is not even mentioning the completely ridiculous hypocrisy the MSM has displayed when covering certain mass gatherings. Some are apparently harmless, whereas others are "superspreader" events. I'm not going to go in depth here because it is an inherently political spin to the larger subject. The overall point is, censorship powers must always be as heavily curtailed as possible because they will almost always end being used in a political matter.
 
So tell me, who is trustworthy enough to decide what is, and is not, "misinformation"? Because I can't think of a single group or organization on this entire planet that I might trust to do so. Algorithms even less.