Elisis

Yes, and mesh too. No, it'll be within margin of error even if it were a thing.

You are not getting 1.35v. You are getting 1.3v max on ambient unless you have a (very good) full loop, and more likely you'll be stuck at 1.2v if you have bad enough fortune as to be running air on x299. 4x8GB. If you're not OCing mem, what's even the point of buying into the platform.

This doesn't actually mean anything as a) it's anecdotal evidence and b) measuring from the wall outlet in general is a shitty way to measure power use, and isn't effective at catching power spikes when you consider the devices that are sold for this use anyway.

How is Straight Power 11 average in any way? Hell did you get this idea from

They didn't say CX. They said CXm. And no, they are not the same thing.

Tell that to 2013 RM...

Have fun with a dying CPU then Attempting to overclock 3600 is pointless, and I heavily doubt you're stable at that 4.6GHz regardless.

1. That's why you do research like a good little PC enthusiast 2. No. The PSU will dissipate the same percentage of system power give or take a percent or two at high load the majority of the time. Barely any PSUs stay cool passively with 80% consumption, and those that do are so overbuilt, so what are you on about? Wattage degradation is simply not a concern if you're running your PSU for less than 15 years, which is a pretty damn safe assumption.

I didn't. All I did was infer that using anecdotal evidence will inevitably end up with people being misled. That's how it works.

Better this than ending up misleading people with your shoddy 'evidence'.

Unfortunately anecdotal evidence is meaningless, so providing such an example is quite useless.

That's an incredibly outdated/horrible case. h510 is decidedly better.

Grey label CXm has all the necessary/expected protections.

You're right in saying that you might objectively be wrong. PP11 is an objectively worse PSU than either SP11 Platinum or Gold

Don't forget the Seasonic ripoff-looking box!