george357

Couple of ARs I put together. 300Blk Pistol and 5.56 rifle

This is great to see, goes to show how effective comments can be. Seems like they had of 60k comments in 6 days!

Very well written! This is the type of comment that get the point across. I encourage everyone to make well thought out comments and urge others to do so as well. When they tried to ban m855 ball ammo one of the major factor that stopped the effort was over 80k comments on a proposal similar to this. Some guidelines on posting: Do not use fake information. Fake names and other info automatically kick the comments from consideration. Don't use foul language. Posts with F this and F that will get kicked out and just serve to cast a bad light onto the firearms communi

Here is the direct link to the ATF page https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2020/12/18/2020-27857/objective-factors-for-classifying-weapons-with-stabilizing-braces#addresses Here is where to comment on the proposal https://www.regulations.gov/comment?D=ATF-2020-0001-0001

I am going to pick up a new all arounder. Kel Tec RFB in 308 with 24" barrel, Hunter Model.

If it helps, I agree with all these as well @fpo

The main issues of steel ammo is thought to be the lacquer used to coat most of them. Here is a good read on the differences https://www.luckygunner.com/labs/brass-vs-steel-cased-ammo/

Good choice IMO!

Welcome to the thread!

Good luck, hope it goes quickly for you!

Unless there is some form of proof that shows CIG/Chris Roberts actually knew game was not going to come out there are no lies at any time frame. If the game don't come out at all it would be a failure for sure but failing does not equal lying.

No. SQ42 is not been, at any time, stated by CIG to release this year. The Roadmap ( https://robertsspaceindustries.com/roadmap/board/2-Squadron-42 ) states that Q3 this year for BETA. This will not be an open Beta that anyone outside of CIG gets to play. With all the leaks I doubt even the Evocati will be involved with the Beta testing of SQ42. Additionally, any and all dates on the Roadmap or otherwise are NOT promises of any kind. These are general statements about what they hope to achieve. Blockers can arise at any time. There is no way whatsoever, to state with a

The Crytek suit is all but dead in the water. The judge already dismissed the bulk of their claims in 2018 ( https://massivelyop.com/2018/12/07/a-judge-has-dismissed-another-chunk-of-the-cryteks-star-citizen-engine-lawsuit/ ) . This is an attempt by Crytek to get out of the case, which they will never refile, without forfeiting the 500k (for CIGs legal expenses) the judge required them to put up in the event (when) they lose. Nothing Crytek states (the excerpt from Eurogamer) is based on fact, just their opinion. As far as the engine, Star Engine has been switched to Lumberyard fo

Moronic posts get called out. If you don't want to be associated with the stigma don't make posts that provide such evidence. IIRC, I also use the descriptor ignorant which can be anyone about a given subject but for some reason you chose to harp on the term moron....interesting.

Well I have absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with Apple so there is that lol. As far as kiddo, heh, that's a compliment at my age