
bitsandpieces
Banned-
Content Count
89 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Awards
This user doesn't have any awards
About bitsandpieces
-
Title
Member
Recent Profile Visitors
The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.
-
Windows To Blame For Poor AMD ThreadRipper Performance
bitsandpieces replied to BuckGup's topic in Tech News
Probably, maybe?! Hi there guys, we launched a new CPU with these awesome features, but don't use it on Windows .. Applause all around -
Windows To Blame For Poor AMD ThreadRipper Performance
bitsandpieces replied to BuckGup's topic in Tech News
So, you're telling me AMD tested TR on Windows (prior to launch) and found no issues, then what's the fuss all about? -
Windows To Blame For Poor AMD ThreadRipper Performance
bitsandpieces replied to BuckGup's topic in Tech News
It's a subset of, x86 can run very well without What if MICROSOFT would've ignored AMD64 extension? AMD would've developed it for nothing; Thus AMD did collaborate on implemeting it into Windows x64, but they dropped the ball with TR and it's implementation in Windows At this point, MS could give less of a flying fuck and ignore TR, at any point AMD thought it was necessary to have MICROSOFT involved?! -
Windows To Blame For Poor AMD ThreadRipper Performance
bitsandpieces replied to BuckGup's topic in Tech News
After they launched it?! HA! -
Windows To Blame For Poor AMD ThreadRipper Performance
bitsandpieces replied to BuckGup's topic in Tech News
I applaud your knowledge, lack there of, AMD64 does not exist in a vacuum and it's not an architecture It's purely an extension to the x86 architecture, nothing less .. nothing more -
Windows To Blame For Poor AMD ThreadRipper Performance
bitsandpieces replied to BuckGup's topic in Tech News
did they discussed it with MICROSOFT during their development? I'm fairly sure AMD had to test their architecture in a win environment - nowhere at any point in this did it ever come up? -
Windows To Blame For Poor AMD ThreadRipper Performance
bitsandpieces replied to BuckGup's topic in Tech News
It's the other way around, AMD has to adhere to x86 specs and they went off rails -
Windows To Blame For Poor AMD ThreadRipper Performance
bitsandpieces replied to BuckGup's topic in Tech News
Windows to blame??! MICROSOFT didn't develop THREADRIPPER, AMD did - was AMD not aware what they were doing? -
Techquickie error, about OEM windows
bitsandpieces replied to Enderman's topic in General Discussion
You, sir, are incorrect just as the OP, and few others Nowhere does it say you can transfer just the OEM licence; where in fact it said that the licence is transferred with the original PC it was attached to Circumventing or ignoring the TOS doesn't make them invalid -
Techquickie error, about OEM windows
bitsandpieces replied to Enderman's topic in General Discussion
This is not a rumor nor is an error Directly from the horse's mouth: https://blogs.technet.microsoft.com/uktechnet/2013/05/14/licensing-logic-whats-the-difference-between-oem-retail-and-volume-licenses/ You, sir, are in error -
is a SATA III M.2 the same speed as a SATA III 2.5in?
bitsandpieces replied to tJuggernaut29's topic in Storage Devices
Yes, it's the same -
Figuring out limitations in SSD memory with my Motherboard
bitsandpieces replied to aero36's topic in Storage Devices
it will work I strongly suggest you read the mobo manual -
Figuring out limitations in SSD memory with my Motherboard
bitsandpieces replied to aero36's topic in Storage Devices
No, that's valid only the m.2 SSD is a SATA drive