ONOTech

650W is enough. Do you have the exact PSU model number? If it's the grey CX unit then it's good enough

650W is enough. Do you have the exact PSU model number? If it's the grey CX unit then it's good enough

The screw catches fire? Just take it out - or sorry, I mean

Rest in peace. I can't imagine how tough that is for everyone involved.
 
Here's the tweet for reference by the way. 
 

Tyler is probably the biggest unsung hero of LTT. Without him, the whole warehouse would've been as big of a mess as the old house, but you never really got to see him on camera. It's going be hard for them to find someone that reliable to fill that void. Godspeed Tyler.

Rest in peace. I can't imagine how tough that is for everyone involved.
 
Here's the tweet for reference by the way. 
 

Rest in peace. I can't imagine how tough that is for everyone involved.
 
Here's the tweet for reference by the way. 
 

Rest in peace. I can't imagine how tough that is for everyone involved.
 
Here's the tweet for reference by the way. 
 

Rest in peace. I can't imagine how tough that is for everyone involved.
 
Here's the tweet for reference by the way. 
 

LMAO 
 
 
 

Kind of expected it, no?

People seriously believe last gen console is going to smoothly run a next gen title at good visual quality? LMAO

It's not even about Hardware Unboxed getting hurt in the first place; it's about NVIDIA attempting to strong-arm reviewers to only focus on the things NVIDIA approves of.

For once, I hope the Internet does shift its massive rear-end and crushes NVIDIA on this. This kind of tactics of attempting to force reviewers to focus only on the things you approve of should not be allowed to pass and NVIDIA definitely would deserve to land in a torrent of hot water over this.
 
Alas, with the above in mind, I expect this will just be covered by LTT with...a brief mention in a Techlinked - episode and then forgotten about.

you know you're supposed to lick nvidia boots, not deepthroat them right?
 
 
it's in the best interest of a corporation to do what brings them profit, they have to. it is also super shitty for them to do this. the two aren't mutually exclusive.
 
 
the fact that the cards are there doing essentially nothing but using power is stupid as all shit. at least with gaming someone is getting enjoyment out of the card. even with folding it's being used for something good. but mining??????????? fuck mining and miners.

Well yes, but there is still something to be said about a company publicly saying one thing and then doing something else. That has nothing to do with money, said companies just shouldn't make statements like that if they have no intention of following it through. In same same way equally stupid people shouldn't make claims about having good availability while knowing that will not and could not possibly be the case.
 
But who am I to recommend companies not say stupid things 😉

Many of you might remember this last year, Gamer Nexus also did a review on it:
Yeston has just announced that a new model based on the Radeon RX 6800XT will be soon available.

Source: https://t.bilibili.com/461513129522320810
https://videocardz.com/newz/yeston-radeon-rx-6800-xt-sakura-edition-pictured
Thoughts: While the color scheme is more average this generation, It does seem to fit PCs that might want a cleaner look since White colored GPUs aren't that common in the market. Not sure how much better the performance is though, GN Steve gave this card a meh in terms of thermal performance.

I heard someone give an opposing opinion that actually made a lot of sense.
 
 
I still think people should some autonomy in playing ads on their videos, especially if it's sensitive content.

Wait, did you even read the OP? Everyone involved owned the game and it was officially released in their time zone.
 
There was no piracy involved here, at all.

A lot of talk for ray tracing as if it's a fully fleshed out feature set that every game on the market currently has. Like 7 games so far support it? Let's not pretend like nvidia had the most  amazing RT performance with the 20 series which was first gen RT. TODAY at this very moment  we can't really look down  on AMD for their RT performance becasue honestly speaking  it's a first  gen product so expecting 30 series levels of RT  performance  was a pipe dream and let's see  what the next generation of RT cards from AMD brings  to the table, we can be  critical about the  performance  then  since  they  would have had time to  make  architectural changes like they did from  zen2 to zen3. As  for the here and now I'd  give them a pat on the back for finally having cards at the high end  that are competitive albeit 6800's pricing is questionable to the 3070's

That's fair. I could be wrong here, but I'm assuming AMD will bank on Microsoft's software team to implement some sort of DX12 solution that AMD can use. Microsoft definitely has the resources to do so. I don't think it will be nearly as good as DLSS 2.0 though

That's fair. I could be wrong here, but I'm assuming AMD will bank on Microsoft's software team to implement some sort of DX12 solution that AMD can use. Microsoft definitely has the resources to do so. I don't think it will be nearly as good as DLSS 2.0 though

That's fair. I could be wrong here, but I'm assuming AMD will bank on Microsoft's software team to implement some sort of DX12 solution that AMD can use. Microsoft definitely has the resources to do so. I don't think it will be nearly as good as DLSS 2.0 though

Nvidia's one critical advantage over AMD in the GPU space is doing the front-facing, consumer stuff better. Shadowplay matters because it's good enough and you can just turn it on. ReLive has spent so much time being buggy that we won't hear if it's working well for probably a year after they get it fixed.
 
As for Raytracing general, the sudden return of the Microsoft-client Minecraft Path-tracing feels less like testing and far more like a long-running feud with AMD NA PR. Yes, we get it. They were run by jerks and pissed off everyone in the NA Tech Press for years. But pulling out something obtuse as a test makes the reviewers look incompetent.  Both NVIDIA & AMD clearly designed their RT approach this generation about baseline adoption rather than actual high-performance. AMD's works fine and it'll get developed for due to the consoles. Nvidia only made Path Tracing better (being core for core unchanged otherwise), which will look better in the future as games will head in that direction, even if it's never really capable of actually performing anything but tech demos well with it. It'll be a few weeks to see if AMD's approach doesn't cause the pipeline stalls & stuttering that Nvidia's will tend to.
 
Raster performance, GPU driver stability and, these days, easy streaming are what matter to the end-users. Nvidia in a bit of a panic mode because they messed up the first part when you look at Pascal -> Turing -> Ampere progression. They're banking on 2 & 3 to keep them from losing sales for the next 4 months.