Jump to content
Search In
  • More options...
Find results that contain...
Find results in...

arekana

Member
  • Content Count

    15
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Awards

This user doesn't have any awards

About arekana

  • Title
    Newbie

Profile Information

  • Location
    Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Gender
    Male
  • Occupation
    Lead Software Engineer (Python, C++, PHP)
  1. After trying it my self for subdir, files in folder_structure_intact_glob(os.path.realpath('./test')): print(subdir) print(files) It seem to work, what version of python are you using ? Can you dump self.options.data_files to see if the array is still intact. My only other guess could be that it might be windows (as mentioned don't know anything about python on windows or windows in general).
  2. After taking a better look at your requested array structure I wrote a small script that will give the output you desire. (The code is not the most optimal and speedy but wrote it for clarity, more then anything else. so you can write your own) import glob import os.path def directory_listing_recursive(path): files = [] for item in glob.glob(path + '/*'): if os.path.isdir(item): files.append([item, directory_listing_recursive(item)]) else: files.append(item) return files print(directory_listing_recursive(os.path.realpath('./test'))
  3. I am not used to python on windows but I would look at the glob library (https://docs.python.org/3/library/glob.html) it has a argument to make it recursive so you dont have to make a recursive function your self. You can ether loop it in a for file in glob('parentFolder/*', recursive=True) to get all the folders and files. or you can get all the files from every sub folder (I also see you want png files so I added that as-well) glob('parentFolder/*/*.{png,txt}') this should give you a nice list of files. can the array be flat or do you want to keep the folder structure
  4. Ok thank you very much for the help. Thanks as-well, very good read. I think I will go for the 702's as its not that big of a price difference and the detachable cable is a feature I do like.
  5. Those AKG K612 Pro's have a very nice price thanks! would these need(or be improved by) a AMP/DAC or is my MBP mini-jack more then enough ?
  6. Those are pricey, but will try to see if I can demo them somewhere to see if they are worth it. Thanks for the recommendation.
  7. Think so(as I mentioned not really a audiophile) Is there is a good reason against one or the other ?. At the moment my company has grown a lot and we can now afford offices for me and other people so any sound getting out is not going to botter anybody.
  8. Sure that is no problem anymore. So open or closed is fine.
  9. Yes I guess that would be a good description of it.
  10. Not especially I think i prefer a more balanced "clean" sound. Don't want to sound to cheesy but as the artist intended it to be.
  11. @Majestic What seems to be lacking for me is that these headphones don't sound as clear as I would like, I have the feeling that when listening to a grand song some instruments are missing or are not as they are suppose to be. I always figured that it was because these headphones ware bluetoothm I and not really familiar with bluetooth vs cabel + dac.
  12. (Will get straight to the point) I am looking for a new headphone and DAC, I am at the moment in the market for new hardware as a few days ago I was at a store that had some great demo's for headphones. So decided to try one out and even on my cellphone with my music in (AAC 128?) it sounded amazing. So not being a big audiophile i was wondering what would you guys (and girls) recommend for a good headphone and DAC. At the moment I am using My Macbook pro's bluetooth (and cellphone) hooked-up to my Sony zx770bn and was wondering what improvement I can make and how to get a better sound. I dont
  13. Thanks that is a really great suggestion I do pref AMD over NVIDIA in linux (driver hell). So will give the 390 a look. Also that video has my interest as would love to be able to use the power from it.
  14. @Starelementpoke Would love to but at the moment have to wait for about 2 min each time i complete a turn (at around turn 120) when it is processing the AI so not really do-able. And yeah think it will be my testing server as it already has some decent spec's but yeah
  15. I am planning to upgrade to 4K, I have been using 4k for about 4-5 Months now and I am loving it. Although I am not much of a gamer, I do more programming and software engineering this is also the reason that I am here looking for some advice. I have the following computers. Mac book Pro Retina 15 inch (specs) CPU : i7 5th gen 4cores @ 2.5ghz RAM : 16gb @ 1600mhz GPU : AMD Radeon r9 M370x 2gb GPU + Intel Iris Pro And a Mac Pro (non trash-bin model) (specs): CPU: Xeon E5*** 6 core x 2 cpus(so 12 cores total and 24 threads total) at
×