Jump to content
Search In
  • More options...
Find results that contain...
Find results in...


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited


This user doesn't have any awards

About Neftex

  • Title

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Not Telling

Recent Profile Visitors

1,880 profile views
  1. ok buddy, did you actually read the email? it clearly says the tool had problems and that it would take time to fix+more time to actually send out all the messages
  2. look the boards have some price when youre buying them, in that price they had to account for the bios development. none of the manufacturers knew they would have to update the bios 4 fucking years later. doing that isnt free and wasnt accounted for in the price of the board. amd doesnt want want their other partners under pressure from public to release new bioses just because asrock decided to do it anyway
  3. ??? theyre not buying exclusives to make direct profit on them, theyre buying them to get people comfortable with using their platform. as long as they make profit from overall sales theyre doing it right
  4. probably a long con, something like sky employed undercover agent programmer that fucked with the code some time later
  5. maybe dont edit your post 10 times before you get a reply. i didnt misrepresent anything, the quote you provided for your argument isnt the ruling. ruling is at the end of the page as i posted and as you inserted later. i even pointed out that you can find and pick arguments for either side from the considered questions, what matters is the end... why the fk would i waste time with your wall of text post when you quoted consideration of questions as a ruling to support your argument. at this point nothing you write can be taken at face value
  6. no <removed by staff>, this is the actual ruling: note this "right to use", "distribution right", "right of reproduction".
  7. 1) youre only linking EU. 2) the above isnt a ruling... its a part of a question that the court considered during the ruling. i can quote you a different one (both are useless on their own) "The copy thus downloaded may not, however, be used by the customers unless they have concluded a user licence agreement with Oracle. Such a licence gives Oracle’s customers a non-exclusive and non-transferable user right for an unlimited period for that program." (again its just part of a question that the court considered, not ruling, basically means nothing just like yours)
  8. sure point me to the court ruling about modifying software with license prohibiting it. you "own the game license" and you can resell it etc. you cant modify the software freely
  9. you living under a rock? most commercial software nowadays isnt sold as property, its licensed for use... (i think i heard about cdpr and their gog actually selling the copies instead of licenses, not sure though. even then if you bought the game on steam then its licensed and not your property)
  10. 1) this is factually wrong in many cases, read about software licensing. 2) youre making mountain out of molehill, cdpr simply asked for removal and nexus complied. the reason was understable and nexus was reasonable. 3) they all know the mod will remain available somewhere, they just both understand removing the mod was ethically good choice
  11. as the court said ios emulator doesnt have the same use as the real os and the code is original work
  12. why did you even want to update? then why did you not listen? every good guide on bios flashing tells you to save the old bios first. "long story short" doesnt really tell us much, you might have fucked up and given the support wrong hardware information or the support fucked up you can ask around forums and provide the most accurate details of your card, maybe someone can get you the original bios