-
Posts
5,091 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Contact Methods
-
Steam
Bladeof_grass
-
Origin
Bladeof_Grass1
-
PlayStation Network
Bladeof_grass
-
Twitch.tv
Blade_of_grass
Profile Information
-
Gender
Male
-
Location
New York, New York
-
Interests
Real-time distributed systems, High Frequency Trading, Finance, Computer Architecture, Software Development, Design, Security, Photography, Fashion
-
Occupation
Engineer @ Hedge Fund
-
Member title
Trying to break the forum
System
-
CPU
AMD 5800x
-
Motherboard
Gigabyte x570 Aorus Master
-
RAM
GSkill Trident-Z Royal, 32GB @ 4000MT
-
GPU
EVGA 2060 KO Ultra
-
Case
Fractal Design 7 White
-
Storage
Samsung 980 Pro 1TB, Samsung 970 Evo Plus 2TB
-
PSU
XFX ProSeries 750w
-
Display(s)
2x Dell U2520D
-
Cooling
Phanteks
-
Keyboard
Varmilo VA67M MX Clear
-
Mouse
MX Master 3
-
Sound
B&W 606 White, Powernode 2i
-
Operating System
Windows 10 Pro
-
Laptop
Apple late-2016 MBP w/ TouchBar
- PCPartPicker URL
Recent Profile Visitors
13,170 profile views
Blade of Grass's Achievements
-
-
The issue is if they sell ANY of their Held To Maturity (HTM) assets, they have to mark down ALL of the assets, which would likely make them insolvent. The reason why they can’t just sell them is as I said — the market value of the assets is not enough to cover the liability they cover, and the assets themselves might be illiquid (I.E. few people willing to buy that much/specific things). If they have to mark down their assets, there’s probably about a $30B hole in their balance sheet (but again, if they hold till maturity, everything is fine). Again, this is just regular boring banking, Btw, Wednesday alone they has $42B in withdrawals, out of $173B, wild. Dodd-Frank changed banking regulation significant, and has very specific rules for banks going under to prevent “moral hazard”.
-
FDIC is a different thing, not even included here. Think about it like this, you're a customer at a bank, you deposit $X dollars, the bank gives you a debit card, checks, supplies you a website, an app -- how do they pay for all of it? Well, the law says that they have to keep Y% as tier 1 capital, which is basically just cash, but then they are allowed to invest Z% to make money in safe assets (like US Treasuries). Let's just call X 100, and Z 60%. So they do, they buy all $60 of 10yr treasuries that pay 1.5%, they give you 0.25% interest, and use the 1.25% left over to fund their business and pay for everything. Now 2 years later interest rates rise, and 8yr treasuries pay 5% -- how much money is that $60 of treasuries worth in the market today? Probably something like $40 But they're fine right? You don't need all your money today? But what if you do? Well, they only actually have $40 in cash, and the other $60 they owe is locked up in a treasury bill for 8 more years, its there, just 8 years away.
-
its probably just pretty boring stuff, treasuries, mortgages, etc. Seems like their issue is largely stemming from a duration gap i.e. people want money now but it's locked up for X time period, and like all regional banks they've been suffering from deposit drawdowns over the last few months as people move money to higher interest rate products. Again, pretty boring, banks go bust all the time https://www.ft.com/content/8e8084b6-a2b8-11e0-83fc-00144feabdc0
-
Also Apple has stupidly large reorder buffers vs. other processors, which is partially why they’re so efficient—their pipelines are always highly utilized, which also helps with performance. Power efficiency wise though, x86 is (probably) never going to be able to compete with ARM—the CISC -> RISC microOp is always going to use additional power, die space, and introduce complexity into the decoding stage.
-
Issue with superscalar processors is that it can be difficult fill all slots every cycle with instructions from a single thread (normally you can only fill ~ half), because you have dependencies between instructions etc, with SMT (or, fine grain multithreading + out of order execution) you can just fill the open slots with another threads instructions, so you get all slots every cycle. Improves IPC and utilization. Wide decoding is just expensive for variable length instruction sets (requires a lot of circuitry) so it's hard to grow the pipeline width. Also makes branch misprediction very expensive (because you have to purge ~ width * depth every mis-predict)
-
Sounds like a high school philosophy paper and is a pretty bad take. The law should represent the will of the people, but clearly it doesn’t and instead is heavily influenced by lobbyists et al. They already do this with Germany, if you set your account location to there then they filter out all the neo-nazis.
-
Tesla Stock Plunge Wipes Out $114 Billion
Blade of Grass replied to Mark Kaine's topic in General Discussion
No? They’re still personally liable for the loan, same as a company. What could be a short squeeze? -
Little update from my post the other week. Uptime now just under 15 days. I've had some software updates installed (Adobe CC stuff, some random other stuff) and downloaded a new macOS update but not installed. Am currently at: Which is more than I was expecting (though about 3x the numbers I saw earlier), 1TB of writes is from kernel_task, which sadly obscures where the writes come from.
-
I don't have an M1 Mac, but I do have a late-2016 MBP (the first with Touch Bar) with a 1TB SSD that I use as a daily. My current uptime is 6 days 5:23, and currently: 350GB seems like a lot of data, I don't think more than 50GB can be from stuff I've been doing specifically. So to summarize, after writing to the drive just over 75x, the drive is reporting having 100% of spare available and only having used 2% of its life (I think that's what Percent Used means? can't be storage since I have over half the drive full). It does seem like it's using a lot of writes--perhaps a bug in the new version of MacOS? But realistically, if 75x writes is 2% of life, then my drive is projected to last ~3750 TB, which at even an accelerated 125TB/yr (assuming it's not a bug), is like ~30yrs of usage. I can't imagine Apple put shit SSDs in the new laptops that have worse endurance then their old tech.
-
what mask do I buy to protect against coronavirus?
Blade of Grass replied to Windows95's topic in Off Topic
Gonna lock this cause it’s obviously very out of date. Please use the COVID mega thread -
Oh yeah, if anyone was interested in how that Danish mask study came to a conclusion that masks don’t work, and why the study is mostly 🗑: https://fooledbyrandomnessdotcom.wordpress.com/2020/11/25/hypothesis-testing-in-the-presence-of-false-positives-the-flaws-in-the-danish-mask-study/amp/?__twitter_impression=true
-
The discord server is currently closed, it will reopen later this week.