AMD ThreadRipper Gen 2 Reviews

[Taf the Ghost]

8 minutes ago, leadeater said:

I also just found this, maybe Phoronix just isn't running the correct versions of software for the test?

 

 

 

18.01 on Windows seems to work fine...

https://www.techspot.com/review/1678-amd-ryzen-threadripper-2990wx-2950x/page2.html

 

 

The 7Zip and WinRar tests, for compression at least, tend to show up in the same realm across most testers I've seen. Decompression seems to work fine, though.

[leadeater]

54 minutes ago, Taf the Ghost said:

The 7Zip and WinRar tests, for compression at least, tend to show up in the same realm across most testers I've seen. Decompression seems to work fine, though

Forgot to add source for mine, http://www.legitreviews.com/amd-ryzen-threadripper-2990wx-processor-review_207135/6. I mean it must be legit, Legit Reviews... ayyyyy .

[Stefan Payne]

....and it seems like the nVidia Graphics cards don't run that well on Threadripper (yet)...

 

 

ACHTUNG: GERMAN INCOMING!

https://www.golem.de/news/32-kern-cpu-threadripper-2990wx-laeuft-mit-radeons-besser-1808-136016.html

 

VEGA 64 is up to 72% faster than the 1080ti (GTA5) or 67% in Kingdom Come Deliverance...

[LAwLz]

On 8/16/2018 at 9:04 AM, Stefan Payne said:

....and it seems like the nVidia Graphics cards don't run that well on Threadripper (yet)...

 

 

ACHTUNG: GERMAN INCOMING!

https://www.golem.de/news/32-kern-cpu-threadripper-2990wx-laeuft-mit-radeons-besser-1808-136016.html

 

VEGA 64 is up to 72% faster than the 1080ti (GTA5) or 67% in Kingdom Come Deliverance...

That benchmark seems kind of irrelevant to me.

What do the benchmarks look like when they aren't being run at 720p? Is it more inline with expectations then?