Jump to content

What is the point upgrading from 1080p 24" to 27" 1440p if pixel density is the same.

tehx

I honestly don't get it - what is the point upgrading from a 1080p 24" monitor to a 1440p 27" montior the pixel density is practically the same with both monitors. Ok, some people may argue you are getting a bigger screen without loss in sharpness but what is the point in a bigger screen you are just going to have to move further away from it so it will basically be the same experience as 1080p 24".I mean 24" in a perfectly usable size. Or am i missing something here

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

The point is the bigger screen while keeping that ppi. 

 

But I get what you mean, I looked into a 1440p monitor and did the math and saw I would get no increase in ppi, just a bigger screen. Bummed me out tbh. 

Laptop: 2019 16" MacBook Pro i7, 512GB, 5300M 4GB, 16GB DDR4 | Phone: iPhone 13 Pro Max 128GB | Wearables: Apple Watch SE | Car: 2007 Ford Taurus SE | CPU: R7 5700X | Mobo: ASRock B450M Pro4 | RAM: 32GB 3200 | GPU: ASRock RX 5700 8GB | Case: Apple PowerMac G5 | OS: Win 11 | Storage: 1TB Crucial P3 NVME SSD, 1TB PNY CS900, & 4TB WD Blue HDD | PSU: Be Quiet! Pure Power 11 600W | Display: LG 27GL83A-B 1440p @ 144Hz, Dell S2719DGF 1440p @144Hz | Cooling: Wraith Prism | Keyboard: G610 Orion Cherry MX Brown | Mouse: G305 | Audio: Audio Technica ATH-M50X & Blue Snowball | Server: 2018 Core i3 Mac mini, 128GB SSD, Intel UHD 630, 16GB DDR4 | Storage: OWC Mercury Elite Pro Quad (6TB WD Blue HDD, 12TB Seagate Barracuda, 1TB Crucial SSD, 2TB Seagate Barracuda HDD)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

You get much more workspace. For example you can have much more of your image visable in photoshop as the tools are all the same size. And you can have a 1080p video preview in a video editor at 1:1 and still see the timeline.

 

You can have 2 webpages side by side and there full size pagse.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, DrMacintosh said:

The point is the bigger screen while keeping that ppi. 

 

But I get what you mean, I looked into a 1440p monitor and did the math and saw I would get no increase in ppi, just a bigger screen. Bummed me out tbh. 

But what is a point in a bigger screen? You just get the same experience but just further away from your monitor. Sure, I understand how a 20" monitor is more comfterable/useable than a 10" but thats due to stuff like I strain and you having to lean over your desk. 24" is perfectly conferrable and is the sweetspot 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Electronics Wizardy said:

You can have 2 webpages side by side and there full size pagse.

Most websites have responsive design so there really is no metric for "full size pages"

Laptop: 2019 16" MacBook Pro i7, 512GB, 5300M 4GB, 16GB DDR4 | Phone: iPhone 13 Pro Max 128GB | Wearables: Apple Watch SE | Car: 2007 Ford Taurus SE | CPU: R7 5700X | Mobo: ASRock B450M Pro4 | RAM: 32GB 3200 | GPU: ASRock RX 5700 8GB | Case: Apple PowerMac G5 | OS: Win 11 | Storage: 1TB Crucial P3 NVME SSD, 1TB PNY CS900, & 4TB WD Blue HDD | PSU: Be Quiet! Pure Power 11 600W | Display: LG 27GL83A-B 1440p @ 144Hz, Dell S2719DGF 1440p @144Hz | Cooling: Wraith Prism | Keyboard: G610 Orion Cherry MX Brown | Mouse: G305 | Audio: Audio Technica ATH-M50X & Blue Snowball | Server: 2018 Core i3 Mac mini, 128GB SSD, Intel UHD 630, 16GB DDR4 | Storage: OWC Mercury Elite Pro Quad (6TB WD Blue HDD, 12TB Seagate Barracuda, 1TB Crucial SSD, 2TB Seagate Barracuda HDD)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Assassinguy2623 said:

But what is a point in a bigger screen?

Whats the point of having more than 16K of RAM?

Laptop: 2019 16" MacBook Pro i7, 512GB, 5300M 4GB, 16GB DDR4 | Phone: iPhone 13 Pro Max 128GB | Wearables: Apple Watch SE | Car: 2007 Ford Taurus SE | CPU: R7 5700X | Mobo: ASRock B450M Pro4 | RAM: 32GB 3200 | GPU: ASRock RX 5700 8GB | Case: Apple PowerMac G5 | OS: Win 11 | Storage: 1TB Crucial P3 NVME SSD, 1TB PNY CS900, & 4TB WD Blue HDD | PSU: Be Quiet! Pure Power 11 600W | Display: LG 27GL83A-B 1440p @ 144Hz, Dell S2719DGF 1440p @144Hz | Cooling: Wraith Prism | Keyboard: G610 Orion Cherry MX Brown | Mouse: G305 | Audio: Audio Technica ATH-M50X & Blue Snowball | Server: 2018 Core i3 Mac mini, 128GB SSD, Intel UHD 630, 16GB DDR4 | Storage: OWC Mercury Elite Pro Quad (6TB WD Blue HDD, 12TB Seagate Barracuda, 1TB Crucial SSD, 2TB Seagate Barracuda HDD)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Electronics Wizardy said:

You get much more workspace. For example you can have much more of your image visable in photoshop as the tools are all the same size. And you can have a 1080p video preview in a video editor at 1:1 and still see the timeline.

 

You can have 2 webpages side by side and there full size pagse.

Ah. I see so a benefit for productivity but not for gaming. But then again wouldn't 2 1080p monitors just be better as you can resize the windows easier

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, DrMacintosh said:

Most websites have responsive design so there really is no metric for "full size pages"

So im on a 1080p screen now and with this site at 100% zoom and using half my screen im in mobile mode, which I think is much worse, so if I had a hier res I can use desktop mode with 100% zoom.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, DrMacintosh said:

Whats the point of having more than 16K of RAM?

That is a stupid comparison. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Assassinguy2623 said:

Ah. I see so a benefit for productivity but not for gaming. But then again wouldn't 2 1080p monitors just be better as you can resize the windows easier

You can also change scaling and make every thing sharper and the same size. I see more pixels as almost  always better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

that isn't really something you can explain with logic, but something you just have to feel for yourself.

Ryzen 5 3600 stock | 2x16GB C13 3200MHz (AFR) | GTX 760 (Sold the VII)| ASUS Prime X570-P | 6TB WD Gold (128MB Cache, 2017)

Samsung 850 EVO 240 GB 

138 is a good number.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Assassinguy2623 said:

That is a stupid comparison. 

Its really not.

Laptop: 2019 16" MacBook Pro i7, 512GB, 5300M 4GB, 16GB DDR4 | Phone: iPhone 13 Pro Max 128GB | Wearables: Apple Watch SE | Car: 2007 Ford Taurus SE | CPU: R7 5700X | Mobo: ASRock B450M Pro4 | RAM: 32GB 3200 | GPU: ASRock RX 5700 8GB | Case: Apple PowerMac G5 | OS: Win 11 | Storage: 1TB Crucial P3 NVME SSD, 1TB PNY CS900, & 4TB WD Blue HDD | PSU: Be Quiet! Pure Power 11 600W | Display: LG 27GL83A-B 1440p @ 144Hz, Dell S2719DGF 1440p @144Hz | Cooling: Wraith Prism | Keyboard: G610 Orion Cherry MX Brown | Mouse: G305 | Audio: Audio Technica ATH-M50X & Blue Snowball | Server: 2018 Core i3 Mac mini, 128GB SSD, Intel UHD 630, 16GB DDR4 | Storage: OWC Mercury Elite Pro Quad (6TB WD Blue HDD, 12TB Seagate Barracuda, 1TB Crucial SSD, 2TB Seagate Barracuda HDD)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Electronics Wizardy said:

You can also change scaling and make every thing sharper and the same size. I see more pixels as almost  always better.

One 1440p montior = 3.6 million pixels

Two 1080p monitors = 4.2 million pixels

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, DrMacintosh said:

Its really not.

how?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Assassinguy2623 said:

But what is a point in a bigger screen? You just get the same experience but just further away from your monitor. Sure, I understand how a 20" monitor is more comfterable/useable than a 10" but thats due to stuff like I strain and you having to lean over your desk. 24" is perfectly conferrable and is the sweetspot 

Preference. 

 

That's why iPhones and Samsung S line phones now come in two sizes 

 

If you're happy with 24" 1080p then I don't see the need to go for 27" 1440p 

 

Some people like bigger screen, some just don't care 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Assassinguy2623 said:

I honestly don't get it - what is the point upgrading from a 1080p 24" monitor to a 1440p 27" montior the pixel density is practically the same with both monitors. Ok, some people may argue you are getting a bigger screen without loss in sharpness but what is the point in a bigger screen you are just going to have to move further away from it so it will basically be the same experience as 1080p 24".I mean 24" in a perfectly usable size. Or am i missing something here

Lower fps in games ;-)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Assassinguy2623 said:

One 1440p montior = 3.6 million pixels

Two 1080p monitors = 4.2 million pixels

But you have a bezel. Its great to have a big screen for things like photoshop and premiere so you can have your tools and work space on one screen.

 

Get a 27 1440p or 2160p screen, there really are a good amount better, and games look much better aswell with the extra detail.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Assassinguy2623 said:

I honestly don't get it - what is the point upgrading from a 1080p 24" monitor to a 1440p 27" montior the pixel density is practically the same with both monitors. Ok, some people may argue you are getting a bigger screen without loss in sharpness but what is the point in a bigger screen you are just going to have to move further away from it so it will basically be the same experience as 1080p 24".I mean 24" in a perfectly usable size. Or am i missing something here

The point is better image and often colour quality, more screen real estate, both for gaming and other tasks, and a generally just nicer experience. The difference is similar to going from an old, analog TV to a 4K TV. Of course if you prefer a smaller screen, that isn't as sharp and has a lower image quality then that's your preference, but I've not yet come across anyone who'd willingly go back to a smaller, 1080p screen after using a 27" 1440p screen, especially if it's a VA or IPS panel.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Electronics Wizardy said:

But you have a bezel. Its great to have a big screen for things like photoshop and premiere so you can have your tools and work space on one screen.

 

Get a 27 1440p or 2160p screen, there really are a good amount better, and games look much better aswell with the extra detail.

 

4 minutes ago, XxMLGMASTERxX said:

Lower fps in games ;-)

exactly

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Electronics Wizardy said:

But you have a bezel. Its great to have a big screen for things like photoshop and premiere so you can have your tools and work space on one screen.

 

Get a 27 1440p or 2160p screen, there really are a good amount better, and games look much better aswell with the extra detail.

Ok that is an advantage but there is also a disadvantage 2 screens are better for resizing windows 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Assassinguy2623 said:

I honestly don't get it - what is the point upgrading from a 1080p 24" monitor to a 1440p 27" montior the pixel density is practically the same with both monitors. Ok, some people may argue you are getting a bigger screen without loss in sharpness but what is the point in a bigger screen you are just going to have to move further away from it so it will basically be the same experience as 1080p 24".I mean 24" in a perfectly usable size. Or am i missing something here

When I went from 24 1080p to 27 1440p the difference in gaming (specifically Squad, a medium paced ranged FPS) was there - despite the same or similar PPI.

Spotting and Hitting targets at range was simply easier.

2 things are relevant now I think about it, I stayed the same distance from the screen and my eyes are old so bigger 'things' are easier to see.

I'm not sure of the science but that was the reality. I know alot of decent Squad players that did what I did and all say the same. 27 1440p is simply better than 24 1080p in Squad and similar games.

I now run a 32 1440p screen, and thats even better for the same reasons!

I don't know/care about the other stuff as all I do is game on the PC but i'm told productivity goes up re the screen space etc.

CPU Intel i7 8700K @5Ghz Motherboard ROG Maximus Hero 10 RAM Corsair Vengeance 32GB 3600MHz 

GPU MSI Gaming X 1080ti Case Thermaltake Core P3  Storage SSD Boot plus Samsung 960 Evo M.2 nvme storage 

PSU Corsair RM750W Gold Display Asus ROG Strix XG32VQ 144Hz 1440p Cooling Corsair H100i V2 

Keyboard Roccat Ryos MK FX Mouse Roccat Kone Aimo Audio MK3 Fostex T50RP + Schiit Magni 3 AMP and Modi 2 DAC 
Operating System Win 10

VR HTC Vive, Audio Strap Motion Platform DOF Reality 2 DOF

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Pixel density on a 24" 1080p monitor is the same as a 32" 1440p monitor. A 27" 1440p has a bit higher pixel density.

 

At higher resolution, fullscreen images like games will be rendered with more pixels, and therefore will be able to more closely represent the object being rendered. Pixel density really has nothing to do with it.

 

It also increases desktop workspace.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, DrMacintosh said:

Whats the point of having more than 16K of RAM?

So you can run anything. I'm guessing you meant 16GB. xD

Make sure to quote or tag me (@JoostinOnline) or I won't see your response!

PSU Tier List  |  The Real Reason Delidding Improves Temperatures"2K" does not mean 2560×1440 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, JoostinOnline said:

So you can run anything. I'm guessing you meant 16GB. xD

No, it’s an old joke from something Bill Gates said. The numbers might have been different but the principle is the same. 

Laptop: 2019 16" MacBook Pro i7, 512GB, 5300M 4GB, 16GB DDR4 | Phone: iPhone 13 Pro Max 128GB | Wearables: Apple Watch SE | Car: 2007 Ford Taurus SE | CPU: R7 5700X | Mobo: ASRock B450M Pro4 | RAM: 32GB 3200 | GPU: ASRock RX 5700 8GB | Case: Apple PowerMac G5 | OS: Win 11 | Storage: 1TB Crucial P3 NVME SSD, 1TB PNY CS900, & 4TB WD Blue HDD | PSU: Be Quiet! Pure Power 11 600W | Display: LG 27GL83A-B 1440p @ 144Hz, Dell S2719DGF 1440p @144Hz | Cooling: Wraith Prism | Keyboard: G610 Orion Cherry MX Brown | Mouse: G305 | Audio: Audio Technica ATH-M50X & Blue Snowball | Server: 2018 Core i3 Mac mini, 128GB SSD, Intel UHD 630, 16GB DDR4 | Storage: OWC Mercury Elite Pro Quad (6TB WD Blue HDD, 12TB Seagate Barracuda, 1TB Crucial SSD, 2TB Seagate Barracuda HDD)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

×