The 1920x1080 MEME PC - WE BUILD & TEST IT

[nicklmg]

Buy AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920x on Amazon: http://geni.us/ByUfrf

 

Buy Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 on Amazon: http://geni.us/Ubo6zPl

 

You asked for it, we built it. The 1920x1080 meme PC!

 

 

[LienusLateTips]

welp it's trash

[The Sloth]

 

 

[Rune]

but can it run crysis?

[nicklmg]

Just now, Rune said:

but can it run crysis?

Probably not with literally every setting (including AA and all that) maxed  

[FloRolf]

wait wat? Are you sayingthe 1920X bottlenecks the 1080 at 4k?

Thats a nono for me. 

[Misanthrope]

Just now, FloRolf said:

wait wat? Are you sayingthe 1920X bottlenecks the 1080 at 4k?

Thats a nono for me. 

Other way around.

 

Though this is a particularly bad 1080 that's not even putting up 1070 numbers or barely, I think they might have screwed up something here.

[nicklmg]

1 minute ago, Misanthrope said:

Other way around.

 

Though this is a particularly bad 1080 that's not even putting up 1070 numbers or barely, I think they might have screwed up something here.

This is with literally EVERYTHING maxed including AA, so no hardware is going to fare well in this type of test.

 

The guys went full-on meme on this one  

[The Sloth]

1 minute ago, FloRolf said:

wait wat? Are you sayingthe 1920X bottlenecks the 1080 at 4k?

Thats a nono for me. 

at 4K you will be mostly GPU bottlenecked 

[FloRolf]

5 minutes ago, Misanthrope said:

Other way around.

 

Though this is a particularly bad 1080 that's not even putting up 1070 numbers or barely, I think they might have screwed up something here.

 

2 minutes ago, nerdslayer1 said:

at 4K you will be mostly GPU bottlenecked 

Yeah but that's basically always if you are doing it right, lol. 

 

I just did my own testing and in Superposition I get like 50fps in 4k Optimized but only 5.25 on 4k Extreme. 

[WereCat]

I don't understand... what do you meme?

[Evolution.]

im kinda triggred you guys didnt do the 1080p results. Dont rush the video guys cmon

[nicklmg]

4 minutes ago, VenomZ_ said:

im kinda triggred you guys didnt do the 1080p results. Dont rush the video guys cmon

This wasn't rushed, that was the point...  

[Evolution.]

4 minutes ago, nicklmg said:

This wasn't rushed, that was the point...  

ik but instead of doing the 720p you shouldve done 1080p because that was technically the point of the vid

[Lurick]

Just now, VenomZ_ said:

ik but instead of doing the 720p you shouldve done 1080p because that was technically the point of the vid

That's the point, to not do the 1080p benchmarks

[nicklmg]

1 minute ago, VenomZ_ said:

ik but instead of doing the 720p you shouldve done 1080p because that was technically the point of the vid

I wonder why we would do a "1920x1080 build" then only show results for 720p, 1440p, and 4k... 

[Evolution.]

 

Just now, nicklmg said:

I wonder why we would do a "1920x1080 build" then only show results for 720p, 1440p, and 4k... 

Dammit YOU TROLLED A TROLL 

[NvidiaIntelAMDLoveTriangle]

So you do a 1920X1080 PC but you can't even benchmark it at 1920X1080?

 

[Evolution.]

1 hour ago, VenomZ_ said:

 

Dammit YOU TROLLED A TROLL 

 

5 minutes ago, NvidiaIntelAMDLoveTriangle said:

So you do a 1920X1080 PC but you can't even benchmark it at 1920X1080?

 

 

[Misanthrope]

2 hours ago, nicklmg said:

This is with literally EVERYTHING maxed including AA, so no hardware is going to fare well in this type of test.

 

The guys went full-on meme on this one  

I don't think that comes around fairly clearly since you previously have used terms like "Max settings" or "Ultra settings" yet apparently you were leaving some of those below max. After the post I rewatched it and catch part that but it's just not very effective, not even for a joke: most of us know a 1080 gpu performs far better.

[idiocracy]

This also explains why 1080 is still standard. People want to play on max settings (assuming the tests are real as some are suggesting they aren't)

[nicklmg]

1 hour ago, Misanthrope said:

I don't think that comes around fairly clearly since you previously have used terms like "Max settings" or "Ultra settings" yet apparently you were leaving some of those below max. After the post I rewatched it and catch part that but it's just not very effective, not even for a joke: most of us know a 1080 gpu performs far better.

Yep I'm addressing this with the guys tomorrow. I think our lack of clarity here really screwed us as people have no context for why the frames were so low.

 

Live and learn... 

[NicklasAPJ]

44 minutes ago, nicklmg said:

Yep I'm addressing this with the guys tomorrow. I think our lack of clarity here really screwed us as people have no context for why the frames were so low.

 

Live and learn... 

 

I have 6 diff GTX 1080, the result you showed are way to low. There is something worng, you have to test it all again, fresh windows, and mabye a other motherboard.

 

but anyway, the 1920x will cause lower Perforamce than any intel 6 gen, cause the IPC of 1920x/1950x @ 4Ghz is not that good. "162" where intel is up almost 200 with 7 gen.

[notlmg]

@nicklmg Can you link us the two bottleneck videos mentioned by Linus in the video? There were no cards of them.

[nicklmg]

20 minutes ago, NicklasAPJ said:

 

I have 6 diff GTX 1080, the result you showed are way to low. There is something worng, you have to test it all again, fresh windows, and mabye a other motherboard.

 

but anyway, the 1920x will cause lower Perforamce than any intel 6 gen, cause the IPC of 1920x/1950x @ 4Ghz is not that good. "162" where intel is up almost 200 with 7 gen.

Literally everything was maxed, including stuff like anti-aliasing. Try it for yourself.