Jump to content

Talking about TDP (Thermal Design Power) of the GPUs

Hi! I think we should make a guide about TDP (Thermal Design Power) of the GPUs. :)

I'm watching so many people asking for thin and light laptops with a powerfull hardware (gtx1070/gtx1080) but they don't know consequences for that. A powerful gpu needs a good cooling system and there isn't enough space for it in a thin laptop. Thermal issues are really important for a thin laptop with a powerful hardware and thermal throttling can easily increase with a drop in performances,

 

H+=+the+Rate+of+Heat+Flow+through+a+cond

here a cooling system

 

648_Sony-Vaio-VPC-F11-VPC-F-CPU-Fan-Heat

 

and here an heat pipe

 

heatpipe-animation.gif

 

What are values for each Nvidia / Amd gpu? where can I find right values for that?

 

 

______________________________________________Laptop_____________________________________

these should be standard values of TDP, but each OEM can use different values :

 

Nvidia

gtx1050  ------>75W

https://www.techpowerup.com/gpudb/2917/geforce-gtx-1050-mobile

 

 

gtx1050ti -----> 75W

https://www.techpowerup.com/gpudb/2912/geforce-gtx-1050-ti-mobile

 

 

gtx1060 ------> 80W/85W

https://www.techpowerup.com/gpudb/2868/geforce-gtx-1060-mobile

 

 

gtx1070 ------> 115W/120W

https://www.techpowerup.com/gpudb/2869/geforce-gtx-1070-mobile

 

 

gtx1080 ------> 150W

https://www.techpowerup.com/gpudb/2870/geforce-gtx-1080-mobile

 

 

Max-Q Nvidia Gpus

 

http://www.anandtech.com/show/11471/nvidia-announces-geforce-gtx-maxq

 

Max-Q gtx1060 ------> 60W/70W

 

Max-Q gtx1070 ------> 80W/90W

 

Max-Q gtx1080 ------> 90W/110W

 

AMD

RX580 ------>????

 

______________________________________________Desktop_____________________________________

 

these should be standard values of TDP:

 

Nvidia

gtx1050  ------>75W

https://www.techpowerup.com/gpudb/2875/geforce-gtx-1050

 

 

 

gtx1050ti ----->75W

https://www.techpowerup.com/gpudb/2885/geforce-gtx-1050-ti

 

 

gtx1060 ------>120W

https://www.techpowerup.com/gpudb/2862/geforce-gtx-1060-6-gb

 

 

gtx1070 ------>150W

https://www.techpowerup.com/gpudb/2840/geforce-gtx-1070

 

 

gtx1080 ------>180W

https://www.techpowerup.com/gpudb/2839/geforce-gtx-1080

 

gtx1080ti-----> 250W

https://www.techpowerup.com/gpudb/2877/geforce-gtx-1080-ti

 

AMD

RX580 ------>185W

Spoiler

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

GTX 1080ti -----> 250W

CPU: R7 1700 @ 3.7GHz - GPU: Asus 1080 Ti STRIX - RAM: Corsair Vengeance LPX 2x8GB DDR4 3200MHz - MB: ASUS X370 Crosshair VI Hero - Cooler: NZXT Kraken X62 2x140mm AIO - Samsung 850 EVO 500GB SSD - Case: Phanteks P400s Tempered Glass - Monitor: LG - 34UM88C 34.0" 3440x1440 KEYBOARD: Leopold FC660M ISO (MX blues) & Tai Hao Cement/Lavender keycaps

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've found gpuboss.com to be a fairly reliable source for getting general info about graphics cards. The RX580 has a 185 watt TDP by the way.

Computer engineering grad student, cybersecurity researcher, and hobbyist embedded systems developer

 

Daily Driver:

CPU: Ryzen 7 4800H | GPU: RTX 2060 | RAM: 16GB DDR4 3200MHz C16

 

Gaming PC:

CPU: Ryzen 5 5600X | GPU: EVGA RTX 2080Ti | RAM: 32GB DDR4 3200MHz C16

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

There will always be a race for thin and powerful performance from consumers to the manufacturers. Well, only time will tell how it will turn out :). And, that's what this forum is here for, to let them know what's technically right :D

Daily drivers:

- HP Elite x2 1012 G2: Intel Core i7-7600U, Intel HD Graphics 620 + Aorus Gaming Box GTX 1080 eGPU, 16GB LPDDR3-1867, 256GB Toshiba NVMe PCIe 3.0 x4 SSD + 128GB Toshiba Exceria UHS-1 U3 MicroSD, 12.3" 2736x1824 + HP Pavilion 22cwa Monitor 21.5" 1080p IPS, Windows 10 Pro 64-bit

- LG V20 (H990DS): Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 (ARM-based), Adreno 530, 4GB LPDDR4, 64GB eMMC UFS 2.0 + 64GB SanDisk Extreme UHS-1 U3 V30 MicroSD, 5.7" IPS LCD 1440p + 2.1" 160x1040, Android 7.0 (LG UX 5.0)

 

Other devices:

- Lenovo IdeaPad Y400: Intel Core i7-3630QM, NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M SLI, 16GB DDR3-1600, 120GB Kingston mS200 mSATA SSD + 1TB HGST Travelstar 7K1000 7200rpm 2.5" HDD, 14" 768p, Windows 10 Pro 64-bit + Ubuntu 16.04 LTS 64-bit [retired]

- Dell Venue 11 Pro (7139): Intel Core i5-4300Y, Intel HD Graphics 4200, 8GB LPDDR3-1600, 256GB SanDisk X110 M.2 2260 SATA3 SSD, 10.8" 1080p IPS, Windows 10 Pro 64-bit + Ubuntu 16.04 LTS 64-bit [retired]

- Acer Iconia W4: Intel Atom Z3740, Intel HD Graphics, 2GB DDR3L-1033, 64GB Samsung MCG8GC eMMC, 8" IPS WXGA (1280x800), Windows 10 Home 32-bit

- Asus ZenFone 2 ZE551ML: Intel Atom Z3580 (x86-based), PowerVR G6430, 4GB LPDDR3, 64GB eMMC, 5.5" IPS LCD 1080p, Android 6.0.1 (Asus ZenUI)

- New Nintendo 2DS XL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ErrystioT said:

There will always be a race for thin and powerful performance from consumers to the manufacturers. Well, only time will tell how it will turn out :). And, that's what this forum is here for, to let them know what's technically right :D

forum like this are really useful for customers. OEMs are not so accurate to inform about performances of their systems. :)

Spoiler

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Keep in mind that many of the thin laptops that feature powerful GPUs often use Max-Q versions.

 

They’re less powerful compared to the standard variants.

The Workhorse (AMD-powered custom desktop)

CPU: AMD Ryzen 7 3700X | GPU: MSI X Trio GeForce RTX 2070S | RAM: XPG Spectrix D60G 32GB DDR4-3200 | Storage: 512GB XPG SX8200P + 2TB 7200RPM Seagate Barracuda Compute | OS: Microsoft Windows 10 Pro

 

The Portable Workstation (Apple MacBook Pro 16" 2021)

SoC: Apple M1 Max (8+2 core CPU w/ 32-core GPU) | RAM: 32GB unified LPDDR5 | Storage: 1TB PCIe Gen4 SSD | OS: macOS Monterey

 

The Communicator (Apple iPhone 13 Pro)

SoC: Apple A15 Bionic | RAM: 6GB LPDDR4X | Storage: 128GB internal w/ NVMe controller | Display: 6.1" 2532x1170 "Super Retina XDR" OLED with VRR at up to 120Hz | OS: iOS 15.1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, D13H4RD2L1V3 said:

Keep in mind that many of the thin laptops that feature powerful GPUs often use Max-Q versions.

 

They’re less powerful compared to the standard variants.

max-q are:

gtx1060 max-q (:DNvidia should call it gtx1055)

gtx1070 max-q (:DNvidia should call it gtx1065 )

gtx1080 max-q (:DNvidia should call it gtx1075 )

 

do you know their TDPs?

Spoiler

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, sicily428 said:

snip

Pretty sure my tuned 1070 outperforms a max q. 

Laptop Main

(Retired) Zbook 15: i7-6820HQ, M2000M, 32gb, 512gb SSD + 2tb HDD, 4k Dreamcolor

(Retired) Alienware 15 R3: i7-6820HK, GTX1070, 16gb, 512 SSD + 1tb HDD, 1080p

(Retired) T560: i7-6600U, HD520, 16gb, 512gb SSD, 1620p

(Retired) P650RS: i7-6820HK, 1070, 16gb, 512gb + 1tb HDD, 4k Samsung PLS

(Retired) MBP 2012 Retina: i7-3820QM, GT650M, 16gb, 512gb SSD, 1800p

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Pendragon said:

Pretty sure my tuned 1070 outperforms a max q. 

is that an OCed gtx1070?

Spoiler

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, sicily428 said:

IMO those max-q are:

gtx1060 max-q----------> gtx1055 

gtx1070 max-q----------> gtx1065 

gtx1080 max-q----------> gtx1075 

 

do you know their TDPs?

Those variants don't exist. MAX-Q variants are the same as the regular ones, just clocked slower. The GTX 1080 MAX-Q version runs at 1290-1468MHz, vs 1602-1733MHz of the regular one.

 

Assuming the MAX-Q GPUs are not undervolted too, you could take the percentage difference of the clock speed and apply that to the TDP since there's a linear relationship between TDP and clock speed.

 

13 minutes ago, Pendragon said:

Pretty sure my tuned 1070 outperforms a max q. 

At stock speeds on either, they're about the same.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, M.Yurizaki said:

Those variants don't exist. MAX-Q variants are the same as the regular ones, just clocked slower. The GTX 1080 MAX-Q version runs at 1290-1468MHz, vs 1602-1733MHz of the regular one.

 

Assuming the MAX-Q GPUs are not undervolted too, you could take the percentage difference of the clock speed and apply that to the TDP since there's a linear relationship between TDP and clock speed.

 

At stock speeds on either, they're about the same.

I call those underclocked Max-qs with these names: gtx1055, gtx1065, gtx1075. That max-q name is a Nvidia's gimmick for selling pricey underclocked gpus to unconscious customers :D


 

 

Spoiler

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, sicily428 said:

I call those underclocked Max-qs gtx1055, gtx1065, gtx1075. That max-q name is a Nvidia's gimmick for selling pricey underclocked gpus to unconscious custemers :D

I find not using common lexicon worse than whatever the manufacturer says. If the manufacturer wants to call a chicken a pig, then it's going to be called a pig. Calling it anything else is going to confuse people who don't know better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, M.Yurizaki said:

I find not using common lexicon worse than whatever the manufacturer says. If the manufacturer wants to call a chicken a pig, then it's going to be called a pig. Calling it anything else is going to confuse people who don't know better.

Infact I wrote this:

gtx1060 max-q----------> gtx1055 

gtx1070 max-q----------> gtx1065 

gtx1080 max-q----------> gtx1075 

Spoiler

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, M.Yurizaki said:

However your lexicon is not common lexicon. You're only going to confuse people with this.

thanks for your feedback :)

do you have infos about max-q TDPs?

Spoiler

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, sicily428 said:

thanks for your feedback :)

do you have infos about max-q TDPs?

If you look at GPU-Z load power consumption figures (I know they're not reliable), most are down about 40% from the desktop equivalents.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, sicily428 said:

Hi! I think we should make a guide about TDP (Thermal Design Power) of the GPUs. :)

I'm watching so many people asking for thin and light laptops with a powerfull hardware (gtx1070/gtx1080) but they don't know consequences for that. A powerful gpu needs a good cooling system and there isn't enough space for it in a thin laptop. Thermal issues are really important for a thin laptop with a powerful hardware and thermal throttling can easily increase with a drop in performances,

It's pretty depressing actually. Based on my experience, once you load these things up they start throttling in minutes. Some designs are really marginal as the small cooler is shared by the CPU and the GPU. Loading the CPU alone or the GPU alone would typically be fine, but everything goes haywire once both components get fully loaded.

 

Frame rates are awesome for the first 5 to 10 minutes of gameplay, then things start stuttering. This is why undervolting is a thing for this kind of machines. Frame rate limiting can also help as it lowers the load on both the CPU and the GPU.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Stagea said:

It's pretty depressing actually. Based on my experience, once you load these things up they start throttling in minutes. Some designs are really marginal as the small cooler is shared by the CPU and the GPU. Loading the CPU alone or the GPU alone would typically be fine, but everything goes haywire once both components get fully loaded. This is why undervolting is a thing for this kind of machines.

I think there is a seriuos problem with marketing gimmicks. OEMs need to sell more laptops and to save more moneys. so they use soldered components (cpu, gpu, now also rams) and they don't care enough about the cooling design, reliability or construction quality. People ask thin and light and OEMs offer those o.O

I'm trying to say: if a customer needs a gtx1070, he should buy a thick laptop with a good cooling system but OEMs offer thin and with overheat issues laptops O.o

Spoiler

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, sicily428 said:

I think there is a seriuos problem with marketing gimmicks. OEMs need to sell more laptops and to save more moneys. so they use soldered components (cpu, gpu, now also rams) and they don't care enough about the cooling design, reliability or construction quality. People ask thin and light and OEMs offer those o.O

I'm trying to say: if a customer needs a gtx1070, he should buy a thick laptop with a good cooling system but OEMs offer thin and with overheat issues laptops O.o

Absolutely. This is marketing-driven for sure (I don't see the engineering team championing this idea).

 

Thin and light designs sell + Impressive spec sheets sell = What we have now

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Stagea said:

depressing

Well u can't overvolted mobile GPUs cept for mxm custom bios laptops. 

 

So undervolting is the only option. 

Laptop Main

(Retired) Zbook 15: i7-6820HQ, M2000M, 32gb, 512gb SSD + 2tb HDD, 4k Dreamcolor

(Retired) Alienware 15 R3: i7-6820HK, GTX1070, 16gb, 512 SSD + 1tb HDD, 1080p

(Retired) T560: i7-6600U, HD520, 16gb, 512gb SSD, 1620p

(Retired) P650RS: i7-6820HK, 1070, 16gb, 512gb + 1tb HDD, 4k Samsung PLS

(Retired) MBP 2012 Retina: i7-3820QM, GT650M, 16gb, 512gb SSD, 1800p

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

I still feel that a GTX 1060 is the sweet spot for a laptop 

The Workhorse (AMD-powered custom desktop)

CPU: AMD Ryzen 7 3700X | GPU: MSI X Trio GeForce RTX 2070S | RAM: XPG Spectrix D60G 32GB DDR4-3200 | Storage: 512GB XPG SX8200P + 2TB 7200RPM Seagate Barracuda Compute | OS: Microsoft Windows 10 Pro

 

The Portable Workstation (Apple MacBook Pro 16" 2021)

SoC: Apple M1 Max (8+2 core CPU w/ 32-core GPU) | RAM: 32GB unified LPDDR5 | Storage: 1TB PCIe Gen4 SSD | OS: macOS Monterey

 

The Communicator (Apple iPhone 13 Pro)

SoC: Apple A15 Bionic | RAM: 6GB LPDDR4X | Storage: 128GB internal w/ NVMe controller | Display: 6.1" 2532x1170 "Super Retina XDR" OLED with VRR at up to 120Hz | OS: iOS 15.1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, D13H4RD2L1V3 said:

snip

I'd want something like an aorus X5 Md with a mux and the 1080 with an unlimited voltage and wattage draw and lemme decide how to cool the thing. Binned 1080s only so max undervolt and Vapor chamber cooling system. 

Laptop Main

(Retired) Zbook 15: i7-6820HQ, M2000M, 32gb, 512gb SSD + 2tb HDD, 4k Dreamcolor

(Retired) Alienware 15 R3: i7-6820HK, GTX1070, 16gb, 512 SSD + 1tb HDD, 1080p

(Retired) T560: i7-6600U, HD520, 16gb, 512gb SSD, 1620p

(Retired) P650RS: i7-6820HK, 1070, 16gb, 512gb + 1tb HDD, 4k Samsung PLS

(Retired) MBP 2012 Retina: i7-3820QM, GT650M, 16gb, 512gb SSD, 1800p

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, D13H4RD2L1V3 said:

I still feel that a GTX 1060 is the sweet spot for a laptop 

At the typical 15" form factor, that's about as high as I'd go as well (unless it's gonna be a thick laptop).

 

Expecting these two tiny blowers and little fins to cool an i7-7700HQ and a GTX 1080 is asking for too much:

gl502vs-rog-inside

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×