Jump to content

I want to run csgo 4:3 streched on a 2560:1440

ThatStudentBoi
Go to solution Solved by exercutor5,
3 minutes ago, Beforston said:

yeah but useing 1920x1440 is crispy clear on the graphics side

That's just the wrong way of doing, but according to your way it would be 2560 x 1920.

i used to play with 1920x1440 on my 1080p but now iv upgraded to a 1440p I don't know what resolution to use to keep the quality 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why not 16:9? 

PSU Nerd | PC Parts Flipper | Cable Management Guru

Helpful Links: PSU Tier List | Why not group reg? | Avoid the EVGA G3

Helios EVO (Main Desktop) Intel Core™ i9-10900KF | 32GB DDR4-3000 | GIGABYTE Z590 AORUS ELITE | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | NZXT H510 | EVGA G5 650W

 

Delta (Laptop) | Galaxy S21 Ultra | Pacific Spirit XT (Server)

Full Specs

Spoiler

 

Helios EVO (Main):

Intel Core™ i9-10900KF | 32GB G.Skill Ripjaws V / Team T-Force DDR4-3000 | GIGABYTE Z590 AORUS ELITE | MSI GAMING X GeForce RTX 3060 Ti 8GB GPU | NZXT H510 | EVGA G5 650W | MasterLiquid ML240L | 2x 2TB HDD | 256GB SX6000 Pro SSD | 3x Corsair SP120 RGB | Fractal Design Venturi HF-14

 

Pacific Spirit XT - Server

Intel Core™ i7-8700K (Won at LTX, signed by Dennis) | GIGABYTE Z370 AORUS GAMING 5 | 16GB Team Vulcan DDR4-3000 | Intel UrfpsgonHD 630 | Define C TG | Corsair CX450M

 

Delta - Laptop

ASUS TUF Dash F15 - Intel Core™ i7-11370H | 16GB DDR4 | RTX 3060 | 500GB NVMe SSD | 200W Brick | 65W USB-PD Charger

 


 

Intel is bringing DDR4 to the mainstream with the Intel® Core™ i5 6600K and i7 6700K processors. Learn more by clicking the link in the description below.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Iv been playing 4:3 stretched for 2 years (iv got 4,000 hours in game) itd take too much to get used to 16:9 again 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Beforston said:

Iv been playing 4:3 stretched for 2 years (iv got 4,000 hours in game) itd take too much to get used to 16:9 again 

um stretched would look like actual crap

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Daniel Z. said:

um stretched would look like actual crap

 

3 minutes ago, JDE said:

Why not 16:9? 

have you ever played cs go bruh

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, JDE said:

Why not 16:9? 

ONE DOES NOT QUESTION CSGO PLAYERS

 

i need muh 3984FPS with a 7740x overclocked to 6.6ghz and 4 titan Xps in SLI , to play csgo at 640 x 480 on ultrawide curved 144hz 1440p monitor

1 minute ago, Daniel Z. said:

um stretched would look like actual crap

slightly larger heads so you can aim slightly better

 

i like to call it magic bullshit 

Ryzen 5 3600 stock | 2x16GB C13 3200MHz (AFR) | GTX 760 (Sold the VII)| ASUS Prime X570-P | 6TB WD Gold (128MB Cache, 2017)

Samsung 850 EVO 240 GB 

138 is a good number.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Daniel Z. said:

um stretched would look like actual crap

CS:GO players who play stretched doesn't play it for looks, lol.

Higher FPS, slightly bigger targets, and personal preference.

Specs

i9 9900K 5.1GHz 0 AVX offset

ASUS MAXIMUS APEX XI

Custom watercooling (360mm, 60mm thicc)

EVGA GTX1080 FTW DT

EVGA T2 1000W Platinum PSU

3200MHz G.Skill RGB B-die

Samsung 970 Pro 512GB

Samsung 860 EVO 2TB

Crucial MX300 1TB

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, deXxterlab97 said:

 

have you ever played cs go bruh

OP wants to play it stretched, no i havent played CSGO

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Klovnious said:

CS:GO players who play stretched doesn't play it for looks, lol.

Higher FPS, slightly bigger targets, and personal preference.

ok lol 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, themctipers said:

ONE DOES NOT QUESTION CSGO PLAYERS

 

i need muh 3984FPS with a 7740x overclocked to 6.6ghz and 4 titan Xps in SLI , to play csgo at 640 x 480 on ultrawide curved 144hz 1440p monitor

slightly larger heads so you can aim slightly better

 

i like to call it magic bullshit 

the only game im close to competetive in is Minecraft. kill me please lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Beforston said:

i used to play with 1920x1440 on my 1080p but now iv upgraded to a 1440p I don't know what resolution to use to keep the quality 

 

4 minutes ago, JDE said:

Why not 16:9? 

 

1 minute ago, Daniel Z. said:

um stretched would look like actual crap

4:3 is supposed to give you better 'vision' in CSGO actually, lower res to increase head size and all that yadda yadda.

Why stretched though? I would play at 4:3 but non-stretched. IF I would play at 4:3 :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Daniel Z. said:

the only game im close to competetive in is Minecraft. kill me please lol

minecraft is unplayable with 60fps for me

the input lag is just

 

give me at least 70fps even on 64hz 

 

 

 

preferably 200+ in vanilla

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

no i dont notice screen tearing and yes the difference in fluidity is HUGE 

Just now, MVPernula said:

 

 

4:3 is supposed to give you better 'vision' in CSGO actually, lower res to increase head size and all that yadda yadda.

Why stretched though? I would play at 4:3 but non-stretched. IF I would play at 4:3 :P

stretched gives even WIDER heads! 

Ryzen 5 3600 stock | 2x16GB C13 3200MHz (AFR) | GTX 760 (Sold the VII)| ASUS Prime X570-P | 6TB WD Gold (128MB Cache, 2017)

Samsung 850 EVO 240 GB 

138 is a good number.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Daniel Z. said:

the only game im close to competetive in is Minecraft. kill me please lol

LMAO HAHAHAAH

giphy.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, themctipers said:

minecraft is unplayable with 60fps for me

the input lag is just

 

give me at least 70fps even on 64hz 

 

 

 

preferably 200+ in vanilla

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

no i dont notice screen tearing and yes the difference in fluidity is HUGE 

stretched gives even WIDER heads! 

lol RN im on mineplex FITE ME M8

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Daniel Z. said:

lol RN im on mineplex FITE ME M8

boi 

 

do you even have legend 

Ryzen 5 3600 stock | 2x16GB C13 3200MHz (AFR) | GTX 760 (Sold the VII)| ASUS Prime X570-P | 6TB WD Gold (128MB Cache, 2017)

Samsung 850 EVO 240 GB 

138 is a good number.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, MVPernula said:

 

 

4:3 is supposed to give you better 'vision' in CSGO actually, lower res to increase head size and all that yadda yadda.

Why stretched though? I would play at 4:3 but non-stretched. IF I would play at 4:3 :P

i find its more for long range headshots e,g, at 2600 units a head is 3 pixl at 16:9 however on 4:3 its 5pix witch is the gap of mt crosshair

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Beforston said:

i used to play with 1920x1440 on my 1080p but now iv upgraded to a 1440p I don't know what resolution to use to keep the quality 

You should have been using 1440 x 1080 on 1080p lmao. So in the case of 1440p it should be 1920 x 1440.

Frost | 7700K @ 4.9GHz 1.36v, delidded | Asus DUAL GTX 1060 6GB OC | Corsair LPX 16GB DDR4 2800MHz | Samsung 960 EVO 250GB SSD + Toshiba 1TB HDD + Toshiba 2TB HDD + Samsung 860 EVO 1TB SSD for macOS | Asus PRIME Z270-A | Fractal Design Celsius S24 | Seasonic M12-II 620W PSU | Corsair 400C White | NZXT Hue+

Samsung Galaxy S8 | Stock

Ticwatch E (Black) | Ticwatch Brown Leather Strap

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Daniel Z. said:

um stretched would look like actual crap

on 1920x1080 running 1920x1440 is not only stretched but is crispy clear 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, exercutor5 said:

You should have been using 1440 x 1080 on 1080p lmao. So in the case of 1440p it should be 1920 x 1440.

yeah but useing 1920x1440 is crispy clear on the graphics side

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, themctipers said:

boi 

 

do you even have legend 

no i have hero DM me ur username ill beat u up 1v1 in something

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Daniel Z. said:

no i have hero DM me ur username ill beat u up 1v1 in something

boi i have ultra for $2.50 

 

 

idk im shit at minecraft and i know it, my ping is 250ms+ because murica servers

ill scream at a former mod for him to ban your ass! 

Ryzen 5 3600 stock | 2x16GB C13 3200MHz (AFR) | GTX 760 (Sold the VII)| ASUS Prime X570-P | 6TB WD Gold (128MB Cache, 2017)

Samsung 850 EVO 240 GB 

138 is a good number.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, themctipers said:

boi i have ultra for $2.50 

 

 

idk im shit at minecraft and i know it, my ping is 250ms+ because murica servers

ill scream at a former mod for him to ban your ass! 

ok?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, themctipers said:

boi i have ultra for $2.50 

 

 

idk im shit at minecraft and i know it, my ping is 250ms+ because murica servers

ill scream at a former mod for him to ban your ass! 

seriously wanna 1v1 lol 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Daniel Z. said:

ok?

discord is on my userpage, username 'The_MC_Tipers' (very original) 

Ryzen 5 3600 stock | 2x16GB C13 3200MHz (AFR) | GTX 760 (Sold the VII)| ASUS Prime X570-P | 6TB WD Gold (128MB Cache, 2017)

Samsung 850 EVO 240 GB 

138 is a good number.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Beforston said:

yeah but useing 1920x1440 is crispy clear on the graphics side

That's just the wrong way of doing, but according to your way it would be 2560 x 1920.

Frost | 7700K @ 4.9GHz 1.36v, delidded | Asus DUAL GTX 1060 6GB OC | Corsair LPX 16GB DDR4 2800MHz | Samsung 960 EVO 250GB SSD + Toshiba 1TB HDD + Toshiba 2TB HDD + Samsung 860 EVO 1TB SSD for macOS | Asus PRIME Z270-A | Fractal Design Celsius S24 | Seasonic M12-II 620W PSU | Corsair 400C White | NZXT Hue+

Samsung Galaxy S8 | Stock

Ticwatch E (Black) | Ticwatch Brown Leather Strap

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×