Xeon Platinum and Gold CB15 benchmarks

[NumLock21]

Benchmark for Intel Xeon Platinum and Gold cpus part of the Skylake-E line up has been leaked. The cpus they ran the test were,

• Intel Xeon Platinum 8176 @ 2.10GHz 28C / 56T
• Intel Xeon Platinum 8168 @ 2.70GHz 24C / 48T
• Intel Xeon Gold 6161 @ 2.20GHz 22C / 44T
• Intel Xeon Gold 6142 @ 2.60GHz 16C / 32T

All of them was tested on a dual socket system, so each has of them has two of those cpus.

 

8176

 

 

8168

 

 

6161

 

 

6142

 

And here is a pic of one of the cpus

 

More pic and source in link

http://wccftech.com/intel-28-core-xeon-platinum-8176-8168-xeon-gold-6161-6142-benchmarks/

[SeraphicWings]

That's a huge CPU

[NumLock21]

1 minute ago, SeraphicWings said:

That's a huge CPU

Does pin count = bigger cpu?

Threadripper has more contacts

[Dylanc1500]

14 minutes ago, NumLock21 said:

Does pin count = bigger cpu?

Threadripper has more contacts

Threadripper is larger overall. 

[themctipers]

alright what the fuck

 

xeon platnium and gold?

 

yeah, somoene call intel up and order us 100 xeon platnium core i9 9371-38v 8 ultra fast cpu for workstation grade compute performance for the ultimate server you need right now as soon as possible revision 3.939

[Guest]

Will we see a Bronze Xeon, will the silver Xeon be rare AF and will the Titanium Xeon exist? Do they also have an 80+ TDP?

[Taf the Ghost]

Those results are amazingly in-line with what you would expect from Skylake cores at that speed.  Though I think the top result might have had an issue populating all of the threads, otherwise it has the through-put below an FX chip.

 

The systems are running right around 1200 score per 8c/16t, give or take 20 points on both sides.  For reference, the Ryzen 7 1700, at stock of 3.0 Ghz/Boost 3.7 Ghz, turns in a score of ~1400.  

 

I'm starting to think Skylake-SP is the exact same IPC at Kaby Lake.  Or the uplift is extremely difficult to pull out.

[Tech_Dreamer]

Thanks again Satan for reminding me about the things i can't afford right now .

[TOMPPIX]

56 cores get a lower score than 48 cores. 

[Bananasplit_00]

2 hours ago, themctipers said:

alright what the fuck

 

xeon platnium and gold?

 

yeah, somoene call intel up and order us 100 xeon platnium core i9 9371-38v 8 ultra fast cpu for workstation grade compute performance for the ultimate server you need right now as soon as possible revision 3.939

but what about some EPYC CPUS tho? that dosent sound much better does it?

[PlayStation 2]

5 minutes ago, TOMPPIX said:

56 cores get a lower score than 48 cores. 

That core clock, though. Kinda crazy all things considered.

[Bananasplit_00]

they are getting more then 10 times the score of my CPU.... well they all had more then 10x my core and thead count too

[themctipers]

20 minutes ago, Bananasplit_00 said:

but what about some EPYC CPUS tho? that dosent sound much better does it?

Epic extreme edition Intel core Xeon platnium plated gold edition for usage in very high end severs and desktop work stations for business usage and with support for a fuck ton of ram and pcie lanes up the ass, über fast CPU with great and astonishing compute power

[bobhays]

35 minutes ago, Dan Castellaneta said:

That core clock, though. Kinda crazy all things considered.

That was kind of expected with that core clock difference. What's actually crazy is the difference between the golds. The lower core count gold is over 50% faster in cinebench. Something doesn't seem right.

 

EDIT: what's also weird is with only 6 more cores, the 28 core cpu gets 2x the score of the 22 core cpu.

[leadeater]

15 minutes ago, themctipers said:

Epic extreme edition Intel core Xeon platnium plated gold edition for usage in very high end severs and desktop work stations for business usage and with support for a fuck ton of ram and pcie lanes up the ass, über fast CPU with great and astonishing compute power

You forgot to put an X at the end to signify it's extremeness.

[leadeater]

12 minutes ago, bobhays said:

That was kind of expected with that core clock difference. What's actually crazy is the difference between the golds. The lower core count gold is over 50% faster in cinebench. Something doesn't seem right.

 

EDIT: what's also weird is with only 6 more cores, the 28 core cpu gets 2x the score of the 22 core cpu.

You can see why in the bottom right of the pictures showing the core usage, CB isn't using any more than the 16 cores per CPU so the higher clocked one will win always.

 

Edit:

In fact it looks like the 6161 has fewer cores being utilized than the 6142 as well, 11 vs 16 per CPU. Wonder if it's some kind of total package power limiting getting in the way.

[tlink]

what are those holes in the heat spreader? is it for prototyping or will it be in the final result?

[themctipers]

4 hours ago, leadeater said:

You forgot to put an X at the end to signify it's extremeness.

It gets a y for being top their

 

like: y the fuck you buying this

[The Benjamins]

I wounder were Eypc will sit against these.

[Guest]

1 minute ago, The Benjamins said:

I wounder wonder were where Eypc Epyc will sit against these.

 

[The Benjamins]

Just now, deXxterlab97 said:

 

Thanks, its Monday and dyslexia doesn't help.

[Dash Lambda]

I didn't even know CB had that sort of scaling issues.

That or it's the CPUs limiting themselves, or that it's WCCFTech...

[NumLock21]

8 hours ago, deXxterlab97 said:

Will we see a Bronze Xeon, will the silver Xeon be rare AF and will the Titanium Xeon exist? Do they also have an 80+ TDP?

Yes we will, in fact this is Intel's new xeon naming scheme. Lowest one will be xeon bronze. They talked a bit about it, 2 wan shows back, but the info was already well known way before that. 

 

[LukaH]

more like Xeon unATTAINium am i right?

[MageTank]

Intel ran out of obscure nomenclatures, so they steal Pokemon's? Do they think we are going to buy these Xeon's just to "Catch 'Em All"?