Jump to content

*UPDATE 2: AMD RX VEGA Spotted in TechPowerUp GPU Database (Supposed to launch April 28)

YoloSwag
 Share
Posted
1 minute ago, Humbug said:

What they have avoided is raw performance. No slides comparing it to Nvidia GPUs in popular games or benchmarks etc. That may be a bad sign.

au contraire mon ami

 

every launch where AMD could not stop talking turned out to have hidden elements

this is why I'm thinking Vega will actually be very disruptive, but ... kinda' late to the party

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted
1 minute ago, Humbug said:

What they have avoided is raw performance. No slides comparing it to Nvidia GPUs in popular games or benchmarks etc. That may be a bad sign.

Maybe AMD just don't want to invite a cock-blocking maneuver from Nvidia ahead of Vega's launch - although Nvidia's already done that with the GTX 1080 Ti.

You own the software that you purchase - Understanding software licenses and EULAs

 

"We’ll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the american public believes is false" - William Casey, CIA Director 1981-1987

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted
2 hours ago, cj09beira said:

VEGAS clock should be around 1500 so i call it just speculation

I love how people just ignore this and got straight for the benchmark and  immediately post about how "disappointed" they are......

 

lets say that is vega and it's underclocked for some reason, wouldn't  it at stock 1500-1600 clock speed pass the ti?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted
2 hours ago, Cartoons Plural said:

All that being said this isn't vega. So irrelevant. 

Aren't the Vega compute cards supposed to be 12.5 teraflop?  It wouldn't make a ton of sense for the consumer gaming GPU version to somehow have less performance.  Unless it's small Vega, although even then I'd assume they would want something between RX 580 and GTX 1080 performance (to compete with the 1070).

SFF-ish:  Ryzen 5 1600X, Asrock AB350M Pro4, 16GB Corsair LPX 3200, Sapphire R9 Fury Nitro -75mV, 512gb Plextor Nvme m.2, 512gb Sandisk SATA m.2, Cryorig H7, stuffed into an Inwin 301 with rgb front panel mod.  LG27UD58.

 

Aging Workhorse:  Phenom II X6 1090T Black (4GHz #Yolo), 16GB Corsair XMS 1333, RX 470 Red Devil 4gb (Sold for $330 to Cryptominers), HD6850 1gb, Hilariously overkill Asus Crosshair V, 240gb Sandisk SSD Plus, 4TB's worth of mechanical drives, and a bunch of water/glycol.  Coming soon:  Bykski CPU block, whatever cheap Polaris 10 GPU I can get once miners start unloading them.

 

MintyFreshMedia:  Thinkserver TS130 with i3-3220, 4gb ecc ram, 120GB Toshiba/OCZ SSD booting Linux Mint XFCE, 2TB Hitachi Ultrastar.  In Progress:  3D printed drive mounts, 4 2TB ultrastars in RAID 5.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted
5 hours ago, YoloSwag said:

Looking at relative performance, it looks like it is just slightly under the GTX 1080 which, IMO, is sad. But the thing is, AMD's high end cards especially the ones with HBM have been performing better in higher resolutions than 1080p, so this could be a mixed relative performance chart. No one should even get current high end cards just for 1080p anyway. However, FPP is under the GTX 1080 as it is as per the database just 9.83 GFLOPS.

It says on that very page: "Radeon RX Vega performance estimated based on architecture, shader count and clocks."

They probably took the performance of the R9 Fury X and extrapolate from it.

I don't read the reply to my posts anymore so don't bother.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted
14 minutes ago, ApolloFury said:

It says on that very page: "Radeon RX Vega performance estimated based on architecture, shader count and clocks."

They probably took the performance of the R9 Fury X and extrapolate from it.

The estimate is a pretty dumb one too. This isn't a final indicator of anything, but let's use the RX 470/570 as an example. It has the same number of SPs as the R9 380x, but it's about 47% faster. A 4096 SP GCN 4+ GPU at 1284 MHz with the same IPC improvements would sit between the 1080 and 1080 ti at 1080p. If it clocks up to 1500, it would trade blows with the 1080 ti.

 

This is the chart I used for the math and I assumed the 1050 ti was the same speed as a 380x.

perfrel_1920_1080.png

CPU i7 6700 Cooling Cryorig H7 Motherboard MSI H110i Pro AC RAM Kingston HyperX Fury 16GB DDR4 2133 GPU Pulse RX 5700 XT Case Fractal Design Define Mini C Storage Trascend SSD370S 256GB + WD Black 320GB + Sandisk Ultra II 480GB + WD Blue 1TB PSU EVGA GS 550 Display Nixeus Vue24B FreeSync 144 Hz Monitor (VESA mounted) Keyboard Aorus K3 Mechanical Keyboard Mouse Logitech G402 OS Windows 10 Home 64 bit

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted

wth kitguru ? the TPU database  info for unreleased products are just kind of place holders, that gets updated when the product is released.

beside do you really believe AMD would release Vega without any event of conference ? dream on, the up coming dates where we might have vega release is computex 28-30th May , or E3 13-15th June.

also there is no way Vega is slower than a 1080, the drawback from is far greater than just releasing a higher end card than the 480, and they had a year knowing the 1080's performance, AMD will target at least 10% over the 1080, and just by the number of CUs, vega should be exactly twice the performance of a 480, which puts it around 20% over the 1080 and about 10-15% under the Ti.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted

All I want for Christmas is 1440 ultrawide 60fps freesync max details.  Can't say I'd be surprised if the perf on techpowerup is as far as it gets. 

 

Quote

This graphics card is not released yet.
Data on this page may change in the future.

There are those who take the stance that when Pandora opened the jar/box unleashing plagues, pestilence, disease, pain and death upon mankind.  That when she closed the jar, only keeping hope trapped with in it, she did so believing that giving man hope or believing in hope would have been too cruel.

 

Something to think about anyways.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted

Sooo if it's the same hour as ryzen, it should be in a few hours.

Well, i guess we'll see :D

If you want my attention, quote meh! D: or just stick an @samcool55 in your post :3

Spying on everyone to fight against terrorism is like shooting a mosquito with a cannon

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
  • Author
4 hours ago, ApolloFury said:

It says on that very page: "Radeon RX Vega performance estimated based on architecture, shader count and clocks."

They probably took the performance of the R9 Fury X and extrapolate from it.

DANG! that was not there went I made this post. They just added it lately due to controversy probably.

 

Does anyone here still have a cached sample or a screen of the original one?

 

UPDATE:

I added a cached version of the page which you can view in the original post.

Edited by YoloSwag
Updated the post.

You can bark like a dog, but that won't make you a dog.

You can act like someone you're not, but that won't change who you are.

 

Finished Crysis without a discrete GPU,15 FPS average, and a lot of heart

 

How I plan my builds -

Spoiler

For me I start with the "There's no way I'm not gonna spend $1,000 on a system."

Followed by the "Wow I need to buy the OS for a $100!?"

Then "Let's start with the 'best budget GPU' and 'best budget CPU' that actually fits what I think is my budget."

Realizing my budget is a lot less, I work my way to "I think these new games will run on a cheap ass CPU."

Then end with "The new parts launching next year is probably gonna be better and faster for the same price so I'll just buy next year."

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted

Hype! This will be interesting. Hopefully it gives Nvidia a run for their money.

System Specs:

CPU: Ryzen 7 5800X

GPU: Radeon RX 7900 XT 

RAM: 32GB 3600MHz

HDD: 1TB Sabrent NVMe -  WD 1TB Black - WD 2TB Green -  WD 4TB Blue

MB: Gigabyte  B550 Gaming X- RGB Disabled

PSU: Corsair RM850x 80 Plus Gold

Case: BeQuiet! Silent Base 801 Black

Cooler: Noctua NH-DH15

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted
  • Author
8 minutes ago, sof006 said:

Hype! This will be interesting. Hopefully it gives Nvidia a run for their money.

As others have pointed out the reported clock speeds are low (1200MHz vs 1500MHz from speculation)

But if it was just 5% slow compared to a GTX 1080 with the 1200MHz clock, how well might it perform to a GTX 1080Ti or Titan Xp if it had 1500MHz.

 

I'm hyped and would by this if that were the case as long as they stick to $500. But if they won't, I guess a discounted GTX 1080 or a GTX 1070 will do.

You can bark like a dog, but that won't make you a dog.

You can act like someone you're not, but that won't change who you are.

 

Finished Crysis without a discrete GPU,15 FPS average, and a lot of heart

 

How I plan my builds -

Spoiler

For me I start with the "There's no way I'm not gonna spend $1,000 on a system."

Followed by the "Wow I need to buy the OS for a $100!?"

Then "Let's start with the 'best budget GPU' and 'best budget CPU' that actually fits what I think is my budget."

Realizing my budget is a lot less, I work my way to "I think these new games will run on a cheap ass CPU."

Then end with "The new parts launching next year is probably gonna be better and faster for the same price so I'll just buy next year."

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted

ryzen leaks were exciting. vega leaks are just sad and on repeat. :S

GPU drivers giving you a hard time? Try this! (DDU)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted
1 hour ago, YoloSwag said:

 

I'm hyped and would by this if that were the case as long as they stick to $500. But if they won't, I guess a discounted GTX 1080 or a GTX 1070 will do.

if it has titan Xp performance as AMD's don woligroski said then it won't be $500.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted
7 minutes ago, LukaH said:

ryzen leaks were exciting. vega leaks are just sad and on repeat. :S

Vega leaks are almost non-existant. Cause the board partners like Sapphire, MSI etc seem to be trust worthy.

 

Ryzen leaks were almost a daily occurrence because AMD had to send out CPU samples for the motherboard guys to test their stuff. And those guys could not resist LOL...

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted
7 hours ago, juri-han said:

I love how people just ignore this and got straight for the benchmark and  immediately post about how "disappointed" they are......

 

lets say that is vega and it's underclocked for some reason, wouldn't  it at stock 1500-1600 clock speed pass the ti?

it very well could

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted
3 hours ago, MoonSpot said:

All I want for Christmas is 1440 ultrawide 60fps freesync max details.  Can't say I'd be surprised if the perf on techpowerup is as far as it gets. 

 

There are those who take the stance that when Pandora opened the jar/box unleashing plagues, pestilence, disease, pain and death upon mankind.  That when she closed the jar, only keeping hope trapped with in it, she did so believing that giving man hope or believing in hope would have been too cruel.

 

Something to think about anyways.

vega is at least 1500 mhz because the Mi25 is 25 tflops of fp16 and to achieve that: 1525mhz * 4 (instructions per clock) * 4096 compute_units = 24.98Tflops (fp16),

from 1200 to 1500 is still 25% increase in clock speeds, knowing how the pro market always has lower clock speeds it could very well be even higher, how much we just don't know

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
  • Author
1 hour ago, Humbug said:

if it has titan Xp performance as AMD's don woligroski said then it won't be $500.

But I remember the R9 290X ($550) beating the Maxwell GTX Titan ($1000-$1200) That's why they had to release a GTX 780 Ti. Sure it's not $500 but what is a difference of $50 worth?

 

EDIT: Correction, it's Titan KEPLER not Maxwell.

Edited by YoloSwag
More info

You can bark like a dog, but that won't make you a dog.

You can act like someone you're not, but that won't change who you are.

 

Finished Crysis without a discrete GPU,15 FPS average, and a lot of heart

 

How I plan my builds -

Spoiler

For me I start with the "There's no way I'm not gonna spend $1,000 on a system."

Followed by the "Wow I need to buy the OS for a $100!?"

Then "Let's start with the 'best budget GPU' and 'best budget CPU' that actually fits what I think is my budget."

Realizing my budget is a lot less, I work my way to "I think these new games will run on a cheap ass CPU."

Then end with "The new parts launching next year is probably gonna be better and faster for the same price so I'll just buy next year."

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted
6 minutes ago, YoloSwag said:

But I remember the R9 290X ($550) beating the Maxwell GTX Titan ($1000-$1200) That's why they had to release a GTX 780 Ti. Sure it's not $500 but what is a difference of $50 worth?

well it should be cheaper to produce than the fury x, because its 596mm^2 vs 520ish mm^2, it only has two hbm2 chips, which also mean that the interposer is also smaller, but it should be more expensive than a 290x @ 438mm^2. so we have a price range of 550-600 dollars 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted
  • Author
1 minute ago, cj09beira said:

well it should be cheaper to produce than the fury x, because its 596mm^2 vs 520ish mm^2, it only has two hbm2 chips, which also mean that the interposer is also smaller, but it should be more expensive than a 290x @ 438mm^2. so we have a price range of 550-600 dollars 

This I like. Especially if it really turns out to be a Titan slayer.

 

Out of topic: Are you really a Floatplane Pilot or is it a tittle here in LTT? There seems to be lots of Floatplane Pilots here.

You can bark like a dog, but that won't make you a dog.

You can act like someone you're not, but that won't change who you are.

 

Finished Crysis without a discrete GPU,15 FPS average, and a lot of heart

 

How I plan my builds -

Spoiler

For me I start with the "There's no way I'm not gonna spend $1,000 on a system."

Followed by the "Wow I need to buy the OS for a $100!?"

Then "Let's start with the 'best budget GPU' and 'best budget CPU' that actually fits what I think is my budget."

Realizing my budget is a lot less, I work my way to "I think these new games will run on a cheap ass CPU."

Then end with "The new parts launching next year is probably gonna be better and faster for the same price so I'll just buy next year."

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted
Just now, YoloSwag said:

This I like. Especially if it really turns out to be a Titan slayer.

 

Out of topic: Are you really a Floatplane Pilot or is it a tittle here in LTT? There seems to be lots of Floatplane Pilots here.

yes i am 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted

Oh come on AMD, still only 64 ROPs for all those stream processors? pls stahp

On a mote of dust, suspended in a sunbeam

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted
3 hours ago, Prysin said:

@Humbug

So if this leak is anything to go by. well....

It isn't. The clock speeds are too low and they reference the wrong chipset.

Intel i7 5820K (4.5 GHz) | MSI X99A MPower | 32 GB Kingston HyperX Fury 2666MHz | Asus RoG STRIX GTX 1080ti OC | Samsung 951 m.2 nVME 512GB | Crucial MX200 1000GB | Western Digital Caviar Black 2000GB | Noctua NH-D15 | Fractal Define R5 | Seasonic 860 Platinum | Logitech G910 | Sennheiser 599 | Blue Yeti | Logitech G502

 

Nikon D500 | Nikon 300mm f/4 PF  | Nikon 200-500 f/5.6 | Nikon 50mm f/1.8 | Tamron 70-210 f/4 VCII | Sigma 10-20 f/3.5 | Nikon 17-55 f/2.8 | Tamron 90mm F2.8 SP Di VC USD Macro | Neewer 750II

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing Tech News

×