AMD Ryzen "Quad-Core" Config Tested vs i7-7700k

[pradhyumn rathod]

AMD Ryzen "Quad-Core" Config Tested vs i7-7700k REALLY COOL RESULTS 

http://www.zolkorn.com/reviews/amd-ryzen-7-1800x-vs-intel-core-i7-7700k-mhz-by-mhz-core-by-core/view-all/

Quote

A test of strength AES with AIDA64 Engineer seems RYZEN will be very nice to do it with the secure encryption of the result in the other side still came in was still behind. 7700K slightly

Quote

This is quite interesting for a lot of RAM. The speed with which the same but with a RYZEN the CR equal 1T, which is probably the reason why the results of RYZEN be slightly superior. Latency is the only one that is still far. But if you ask me that, in a sense. I viewed it equally as well if it was not in the picture, and if the match is correct Latency is a point that AMD should improve greatly.

Quote

Fire Strike Ultra for the two systems to work out the level is very similar in every part.

Quote

For Rise of the Tomb Raider series that looks average, it is considered to be similar, but the 7700K is clearly better than the third Test against Geothermal Valley 7700K, which is preferably more. The frame came out higher than 15FPS 1800X Overall, resulting in a system that is slightly above 7700K.

 

Quote

GeekBench 4 as a result of the test will be in both. Single-Thread and Multi-Thread, but with the testing format is different from CINEBENCH R15 because GeekBench to measure both the CINEBENCH will highlight the power of the CPU by the effect of this 7700K, the result was better than both of them. But also accounted for in the original. Single-Thread is RYZEN is behind about 12% of it is in the Multi-Thread to follow the narrows to only 10%, it shows that the scale of the Multi-Thread RYZEN do better.

 

 

[The Sloth]

edit- no, it doesn't suck at gaming, also not" i5 of gaming".  

Edited March 10, 2017 by nerdslayer1

[Guest Kloaked]

Just now, nerdslayer1 said:

edit- no, it doesn't suck at gaming, also not" i5 of gaming".  

It is essentially an i5 for gaming compared to Intel's current i7 CPUs.

[Dietrichw]

This is interesting. I would like to know how they configured the 1800x. Did they disable two cores from each CCX or disable a whole CCX? Bad translation makes it difficult to know their methodology. I'm also curious to see tests comparing one CCX on its own vs two CCX's with two cores enabled.

If the gaming benchmarks in the source are to be believed to be accurate CPU bound tests this looks good.

[The Sloth]

Just now, Kloaked said:

It is essentially an i5 for gaming compared to Intel's current i7 CPUs.

watch jays video

[PCGuy_5960]

6 minutes ago, nerdslayer1 said:

edit- no, it doesn't suck at gaming, also not" i5 of gaming".  

It isn't utter shit for gaming... Jay didn't compare it to an i7 or an i5. He said that he got perfectly playable framerates with Ryzen, not that he got FPS that was on par with an i7....

[ZimFreak]

Won't anybody think of the children night-mode users?!?

[The Sloth]

Just now, PCGuy_5960 said:

It isn't utter shit for gaming... Jay didn't compare it to an i7 or an i5. He said that he got perfectly playable framerates with Ryzen, not that he got FPS that was on par with an i7....

 

didn't say its par with a i7 7700k, i said its not i5 in gaming. performance will vary depending on games and optimization. 

[Guest Kloaked]

Just now, nerdslayer1 said:

watch jays video

I did when he first released it. I also watched other videos that actually provided numbers.

[PCGuy_5960]

Just now, nerdslayer1 said:

didn't say its par with a i7 7700k, i said its not i5 in gaming. performance will vary depending on games and optimization. 

Did he test in against an i5? No.... Gamers Nexus though, did and guess what they found...

[2FA]

Just now, PCGuy_5960 said:

Did he test in against an i5? No.... Gamers Nexus though, did and guess what they found...

Smoother gameplay on the 1800X due to the increased thread count whereas the i5 was more likely to have stuttering? That's a thing...

[The Sloth]

58 minutes ago, PCGuy_5960 said:

Did he test in against an i5? No.... Gamers Nexus though, did and guess what they found...

when the x99 platform first came out people used to shit on them for stability, now its a gold standard for creative work it can also can handle all games extremely well. my point being testing on day one than claiming its "i5 of gaming" is pointless, its a better idea to wait before claiming something that big. 

[PCGuy_5960]

1 minute ago, DeadEyePsycho said:

Smoother gameplay on the 1800X due to the increased thread count whereas the i5 was more likely to have stuttering? That's a thing...

Yes. But this issue can be eliminated by getting an i7-6700K....

[Memories4K]

2 minutes ago, nerdslayer1 said:

didn't say its par with a i7 7700k, i said its not i5 in gaming. performance will vary depending on games and optimization. 

Pretty much most benchmarks had it around the performance of a 7600k/6600k.
So if it's not on par with an i7, well you can bet the next best thing is an i5,
I don't know how Ryzen has changed since launch, hopefully for the better, but i'm not going to argue against the fact that when it comes to gaming that Ryzen's performance has been most marked at the i5 level.

Just now, DeadEyePsycho said:

Smoother gameplay on the 1800X due to the increased thread count whereas the i5 was more likely to have stuttering? That's a thing...

I've heard great things about Ryzen being "smoother" (better frametimes for sure, which is rad) but that doesn't change anything about the frame-rate that's comparable to the i5.

[The Sloth]

1 minute ago, PCGuy_5960 said:

Yes. But this issue can be eliminated by getting an i7-6700K....

different cpu are for different task, a i7 6700k or 7700k can't handle havey multitasking well as a multicore x99 or zen can. 

[PCGuy_5960]

1 minute ago, nerdslayer1 said:

my point being testing on day one than claiming its "i5 of gaming is pointless", its a better idea to wait before claiming something that big. 

Has X99's performance changed? Nope....

[2FA]

Just now, Memories4K said:

Pretty much most benchmarks had it around the performance of a 7600k/6600k.
So if it's not on par with an i7, well you can bet the next best thing is an i5,
I don't know how Ryzen has changed since launch, hopefully for the better, but i'm not going to argue against the fact that when it comes to gaming that Ryzen's performance has been most marked at the i5 level.

I wasn't talking FPS, I was talking frame times which is arguably more important for smoother gameplay.

[PCGuy_5960]

Just now, nerdslayer1 said:

different cpu are for different task, a i7 6700k or 7700k can't handle havey multitasking well as a multicore x99 or zen can. 

Yes. So what makes you think that Ryzen is a gaming CPU?

[2FA]

Just now, PCGuy_5960 said:

Has X99's performance changed? Nope....

No but it costs twice as much.

[PCGuy_5960]

Just now, DeadEyePsycho said:

No but it costs twice as much.

You missed the point  I meant that X99 had stability issues, however, performance hasn't changed. Just like Ryzen, it has stability issues and performance will probably not change.

[Memories4K]

Just now, DeadEyePsycho said:

I wasn't talking FPS, I was talking frame times which is arguably more important for smoother gameplay.

Well nobody else is talking frame-times because that's not what we're comparing, i like the frame-times on Ryzen though

[Dietrichw]

Thread derailed instantly..... All it is about is a four core config  test of the 1800x and yet people argue over the results of the eight core config which aren't even mentioned. 

[The Sloth]

Just now, PCGuy_5960 said:

Has X99's performance changed? Nope....

.... day 1 x99 had so many problems, i would say now its better. more games are taking advantage of multicore CPUs, testing with 720p lowest setting is also a real world senerio i see most people with titan x sli or gtx 1080 sli take part in.  

[2FA]

7 minutes ago, PCGuy_5960 said:

You missed the point  I meant that X99 had stability issues, however, performance hasn't changed. Just like Ryzen, it has stability issues and performance will probably not change.

While I'm not saying it will be a huge change, many game devs have said they have optimization patches in the work that give very good boosts.

 

EDIT: Holy fuck, grammar mistake changed whole context

[PCGuy_5960]

Just now, Dietrichw said:

Thread derailed instantly.....

Welcome to the LTT forums!