AMD Ryzen HAS BEEN ANNOUNCED!!!

[Orangeator]

2 minutes ago, potoooooooo said:

Why are you disappointed? It performed even better than they told us it would...

Some people just can't accept that Intel just got their ass handed to them on a silver platter for the first time in many years.

[Clanscorpia]

1 minute ago, Orangeator said:

Some people just can't accept that Intel just got their ass handed to them on a silver platter for the first time in many years.

Dude, Im an AMD fanboy, but honestly for gamers this wasnt what we needed, Intel still performs better, just costs more

[Orangeator]

1 minute ago, Clanscorpia said:

No it didnt, it per clock performed terribly compared to broadwell

What the hell are you smoking... 1800x matched the 6900k in single core performance (162 to 162) at the same clock speed.

[Clanscorpia]

1 minute ago, Orangeator said:

What the hell are you smoking... 1800x matched the 6900k in single core performance (162 to 162) at the same clock speed.

Not the same clock speed? That was at stock for both, and thats still broadwell, not Kaby or Sky

[Orangeator]

1 minute ago, Clanscorpia said:

Dude, Im an AMD fanboy, but honestly for gamers this wasnt what we needed, Intel still performs better, just costs more

You haven't seen AMD's Ryzen chips for gaming... The 4 cores and 6 core ones. So hold off on the disappointment. You are killing the hype train.

[Clanscorpia]

1 minute ago, Orangeator said:

You haven't seen AMD's Ryzen chips for gaming... The 4 cores and 6 core ones.

We literally saw single core performance which was worse than Intels, we can make well based inferences

 

1 minute ago, Orangeator said:

You are killing the hype train.

Thats the point

[Orangeator]

1 minute ago, Clanscorpia said:

We literally saw single core performance which was worse than Intels, we can make well based inferences

 

Thats the point

You do realize the less cores the better single core performance gets... You have no idea how well or how bad the 4 core and 6 core SKU's will perform.

 

6900k max turbo: 4GHz.

1800X max turbo: 4Ghz.

6900k cinebench R15 1T score: 162

1800X cinebench R15 1T score: 162

 

And no the exact same clock speed. Thus the IPC is the same.

[Ryujin2003]

1 minute ago, Orangeator said:

You do realize the less cores the better single core performance gets... You have no idea how well or how bad the 4 core and 6 core SKU's will perform.

Do you care to provide scientific calculations for this bit of information?

[Techstorm970]

8 minutes ago, Clanscorpia said:

Not the same clock speed? That was at stock for both, and thats still broadwell, not Kaby or Sky

You seriously expected Ryzen to beat Kaby Lake in single-core performance?

[Techstorm970]

3 minutes ago, Orangeator said:

You do realize the less cores the better single core performance gets...

NOT TRUE

[Clanscorpia]

6 minutes ago, Orangeator said:

You do realize the less cores the better single core performance gets... You have no idea how well or how bad the 4 core and 6 core SKU's will perform.

 

6900k max turbo: 4GHz.

1800X max turbo: 4Ghz.

6900k cinebench R15 1T score: 162

1800X cinebench R15 1T score: 162

 

And no the exact same clock speed. Thus the IPC is the same.

The 6900K turbos to 3.7 dude, and looking at Linus' video, the 6900K wasnt boosting

[Techstorm970]

7 minutes ago, Orangeator said:

You have no idea how well or how bad the 4 core and 6 core SKU's will perform.

Also not true.  I have made Ryzen performance theories based on rumors and the behavior of Intel's processors.  Thus far, they have been proven accurate by this thread.

[Clanscorpia]

8 minutes ago, Orangeator said:

You have no idea how well or how bad the 4 core and 6 core SKU's will perform.

 

Well we know how these ones do and elementary math isnt that difficult

[Techstorm970]

3 minutes ago, Clanscorpia said:

The 6900K turbos to 3.7 dude, and looking at Linus' video, the 6900K wasnt boosting

You sure seem like a ray of sunshine....

[Clanscorpia]

1 minute ago, techstorm970 said:

You sure seem like a ray of sunshine....

I just got back from school. Enough said

[Techstorm970]

2 minutes ago, Clanscorpia said:

I just got back from school. Enough said

Oh....yeah I understand that. 

[Orangeator]

1 minute ago, techstorm970 said:

NOT TRUE

Does the 6700k not have better single core performance then a 6900k?

[Techstorm970]

3 minutes ago, Clanscorpia said:

I just got back from school. Enough said

Also, great job on picking up on my sarcasm! 

 

[Techstorm970]

1 minute ago, Orangeator said:

Does the 6700k not have better single core performance then a 6900k?

Yeah...but the 6700k is at 4GHz and the 6900k is at 3.2GHz.  Plus, Skylake and Broadwell-E are two different architectures.

[Orangeator]

1 minute ago, techstorm970 said:

Yeah...but the 6700k is at 4GHz and the 6900k is at 3.2GHz.  Plus, Skylake and Broadwell-E are two different architectures.

Generally the conscientious is the more cores you have within the same architecture the less the single core performance is. I could prove this over and over again.

[Clanscorpia]

5 minutes ago, techstorm970 said:

Also, great job on picking up on my sarcasm! 

 

Im just salty bc of school

[Ryujin2003]

2 minutes ago, Orangeator said:

Generally the conscientious is the more cores you have within the same architecture the less the single core performance is. I could prove this over and over again.

consensus not conscientious....

 

Ok, well instead of proving this over and over, how about just once?

[Clanscorpia]

3 minutes ago, Orangeator said:

Generally the conscientious is the more cores you have within the same architecture the less the single core performance is. I could prove this over and over again.

Do you even understand how CPUs work

[Techstorm970]

1 minute ago, Orangeator said:

Generally the conscientious is the more cores you have within the same architecture the less the single core performance is. I could prove this over and over again.

That is because of heat output.  The more cores a processor has, the more power it draws and the more heat it puts out.  A quad core will have higher clocks than a hexacore simply because it can achieve those clocks without putting out too much heat.

[Orangeator]

3 minutes ago, techstorm970 said:

That is because of heat output.  The more cores a processor has, the more power it draws and the more heat it puts out.  A quad core will have higher clocks than a hexacore simply because it can achieve those clocks without putting out too much heat.

This is what I was trying to say^^^