Another Ryzen benchmark

[Space Reptile]

leaked by a chinese site wich took it down asap , just spotted on reddit by the same guy who leaked all the other stuff

also seen on videocardz https://videocardz.com/66182/amd-radeon-7-1700x-pictured-and-tested

 

take it w/ a MASSIVE AMOUNT OF SALT please

 

[samcool55]

I don't know tbh... It does look like the leak wasn't an "accident".

Why else would you blur out some of those things?

 

Also, i might be wrong but especially the 0.536V value seems familiar, isn't there an intel CPU that has the exact same voltage when it's in a specific state?

Might be a coincidence but still

[Megah3rtz]

Why have they censored the rest of the firestrike info?

[Space Reptile]

3 minutes ago, Megah3rtz said:

Why have they censored the rest of the firestrike info?

i have no idea, in the VCnet article the amd FX cpu is censored ... ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

[P4ZD4]

There's enough AMD leaks to create a new forum section 

[drok]

looks like that firestrike pic came from the future

[Space Reptile]

8 minutes ago, drok said:

looks like that firestrike pic came from the future

[PianoPlayer88Key]

Just out of curiosity, I did a few Cinebench single-threaded runs on my i7-6700K, plus one all-threads run.  This was right after restarting Windows 10.  Speeds were adjusted by reducing the maximum processor state percentage in Windows power options, and using CPU-Z to verify the correct speed.  (Nitpick: bus speed was usually 99.7x-99.9x and not 100, resulting in the actual clock speeds being a little less than indicated below.  I'm almost tempted to see about bumping the BCLK to like 101 MHz, if it'll let me.  The chipset is Z170, and the CPU is a K, so I'd think it should.  I just want to be careful, as it IS a laptop.)

 

• First run - 1 thread, 3.4 GHz (1700X stock speed) = 143
• Second run - 1 thread, 3.8 GHz (1700X default boost) = 162
• Third run - 1 thread, 4.0 GHz (What my laptop's 6700K chose to run) = 173
• Fourth Run - 8 threads, 4.0 GHz = 860

 

For obvious reasons I didn't do an 8c/16t run.

 

 

I'd like to know exactly what speed the R7-1700X was running for the single-threaded CineBench test.  For example, If it was 3.4 GHz, it would beat my Skylake CPU by 7.7% in IPC, if I'm calculating right.  If 3.8 GHz, my Skylake would beat it by 5.2%.  If it was boosting to, say, 4.0 GHz, then my 6700K beats it by 12.3%.

 

My Haswell i7-4790K desktop isn't powered up right now.  Linux is hibernated, so I don't really want to boot Windows on it yet, until I finish what I was working on.  Pulling stuff off old hard drives is taking longer than I expected, stretching into weeks or a month or more - not because the drives are dying yet, but because I have so many other things going on, some local storms prompting me to power off the PC for safety, etc.

[suicidalfranco]

can't wait for this CPU to get released so the AMD threads spam can finally stop 

[Morgan MLGman]

43 minutes ago, PianoPlayer88Key said:

Just out of curiosity, I did a few Cinebench single-threaded runs on my i7-6700K, plus one all-threads run.  This was right after restarting Windows 10.  Speeds were adjusted by reducing the maximum processor state percentage in Windows power options, and using CPU-Z to verify the correct speed.  (Nitpick: bus speed was usually 99.7x-99.9x and not 100, resulting in the actual clock speeds being a little less than indicated below.  I'm almost tempted to see about bumping the BCLK to like 101 MHz, if it'll let me.  The chipset is Z170, and the CPU is a K, so I'd think it should.  I just want to be careful, as it IS a laptop.)

 

• First run - 1 thread, 3.4 GHz (1700X stock speed) = 143
• Second run - 1 thread, 3.8 GHz (1700X default boost) = 162
• Third run - 1 thread, 4.0 GHz (What my laptop's 6700K chose to run) = 173
• Fourth Run - 8 threads, 4.0 GHz = 860

 

For obvious reasons I didn't do an 8c/16t run.

 

 

I'd like to know exactly what speed the R7-1700X was running for the single-threaded CineBench test.  For example, If it was 3.4 GHz, it would beat my Skylake CPU by 7.7% in IPC, if I'm calculating right.  If 3.8 GHz, my Skylake would beat it by 5.2%.  If it was boosting to, say, 4.0 GHz, then my 6700K beats it by 12.3%.

 

My Haswell i7-4790K desktop isn't powered up right now.  Linux is hibernated, so I don't really want to boot Windows on it yet, until I finish what I was working on.  Pulling stuff off old hard drives is taking longer than I expected, stretching into weeks or a month or more - not because the drives are dying yet, but because I have so many other things going on, some local storms prompting me to power off the PC for safety, etc.

It was probably boosting cause the 1700X has the XFR feature which overclocks the CPU beyond its Turbo frequency if the thermals and voltages are still low-enough, works similar to the GPU Boost 3.0 on Pascal.

 

But it seems like it's a bit over Haswell in terms of IPC meaning it's probably like Broadwell, so that's a good news if confirmed. This is all you need for gaming tbh in terms of IPC.

[Zandvliet]

2 hours ago, drok said:

looks like that firestrike pic came from the future

Haha indeed, 2017-02-25  

[TidaLWaveZ]

1 hour ago, suicidalfranco said:

can't wait for this CPU to get released so the AMD threads spam can finally stop 

and all the official benchmark thread spam can start.

[Doobeedoo]

Very interesting so far. I plan to get 8 core but I wonder much 4 core will be able to OC though.

[suicidalfranco]

3 minutes ago, TidaLWaveZ said:

and all the official benchmark thread spam can start.

oh...

 

 

 

 

 

 

fuck.

[WereCat]

1 hour ago, suicidalfranco said:

can't wait for this CPU to get released so the AMD threads spam can finally stop 

If anything it will be completely opposite of what you just said.

[Mr.Meerkat]

13 minutes ago, suicidalfranco said:

oh...

Looks like someone forgot about how the most hyped up piece of technology of the decade is obviously going to get official benchmarks...

[AresKrieger]

Why can't anyone just wait a week, I mean seriously this is getting absurd at this point.

[suicidalfranco]

2 minutes ago, AresKrieger said:

Why can't anyone just wait a week, I mean seriously this is getting absurd at this point.

"gotta make sure linus says my name on the wan show, even if they tend to avoid rumour news mill"

9 minutes ago, Mr.Meerkat said:

Looks like someone forgot about how the most hyped up piece of technology of the decade is obviously going to get official benchmarks...

if only it ended up to be a single thread that spans for 40 pages and not everyone trying to post the same exact thing seen from a different light 

[TidaLWaveZ]

20 minutes ago, suicidalfranco said:

oh...

 

 

 

 

 

 

fuck.

 

Hey, you should be happy about all the threads. How else would you have learned that intel is an evil, greedy company and AMD doesn't care about making money, just making consumers happy?

[suicidalfranco]

1 minute ago, TidaLWaveZ said:

 

Hey, you should be happy about all the threads. How else would you have learned that intel is an evil, greedy company and AMD doesn't care about making money, just making consumers happy?

wat?

i thought it was all about people grabbing knifes and stab each other and move to the next and repeat the same exact conclusion 

[TidaLWaveZ]

2 minutes ago, suicidalfranco said:

wat?

i thought it was all about people grabbing knifes and stab each other and move to the next and repeat the same exact conclusion 

All I know is that it's not about butthole pleasures at all.

[TOMPPIX]

All leaks have the same amount of cache.

didn't notice they were all from the same website 

[Mr.Meerkat]

25 minutes ago, suicidalfranco said:

wat?

i thought it was all about people grabbing knifes and stab each other and move to the next and repeat the same exact conclusion 

https://www.techpowerup.com/230800/amd-vs-nvidia-flamewar-claims-its-first-irl-fatality

...

[suicidalfranco]

3 minutes ago, Mr.Meerkat said:

https://www.techpowerup.com/230800/amd-vs-nvidia-flamewar-claims-its-first-irl-fatality

...

every LTT thread about nvidia, amd and intel

[Mr.Meerkat]

3 minutes ago, suicidalfranco said:

every LTT thread about nvidia, amd and intel

The comments...they're worse than the actual article  

Spoiler

Quote

Full of Hot Air
Green with Envy
Bleed Red til Dead
EVGA cooling on his VRM temper

MurderWorks
The Way Its Meant To Be Slayed
GFE - GeForce Execution

 

Quote

When the murderer arrives in Hell, his punishment will be that all the PCs in Hell are running AMD cards, and there's no Wraith coolers or water cooling...this also explains the high temps, lake of fire, screaming, gnashing of teeth, etc.

 

Ah, you always get the best comments in a thread/topic/article like that