AMD Ryzen Full Lineup Prices, Specs & Clock Speeds Leaked

[cj09beira]

1 minute ago, PCGuy_5960 said:

I know. Games like Watch_dogs 2 and Battlefield 1 are using more than 4C/8T and are able to fully utilise 12 Threads! But the reality of it is that right now, having more than 8 threads, doesn't really benefit you in most games.

but we don't buy hardware to last 6 months right?

[PCGuy_5960]

3 minutes ago, cj09beira said:

but we don't buy hardware to last 6 months right?

Exactly. This is why a 5820K/6800K is a better choice than a 7700K atm and Ryzen will be an even better choice!

[79wjd]

1 minute ago, PCGuy_5960 said:

Exactly. This is why a 5820K/6800K is a better choice than a 7700K atm and Ryzen will be an even better choice!

4c/8t is just starting to be beneficial. By the time you need more than that, a 6800k will be irrelevant anyway.

[Prysin]

In the spirit of Trump. 

FAKE NEWS

[PCGuy_5960]

1 minute ago, djdwosk97 said:

4c/8t is just starting to be beneficial. By the time you need more than that, a 6800k will be irrelevant anyway.

Watch_dogs 2 uses more than 8 threads

Battlefield 1 uses more than 8 threads

Heck, even CS:GO uses more than 8 threads!

 

[cj09beira]

2 minutes ago, djdwosk97 said:

4c/8t is just starting to be beneficial. By the time you need more than that, a 6800k will be irrelevant anyway.

we will not see much more increase in ipc from now on so in 4 years the biggest difference will be the number of cores and not the ipc, and because of that now is a good time to buy more than 4 cores

[PCGuy_5960]

2 minutes ago, cj09beira said:

we will not see much more increase in ipc from now on

Unless, Intel gets inspired by AMD's 40% IPC improvement and brings a huge IPC improvement with Cannonlake

[divito]

22 minutes ago, Trixanity said:

They have no reason to discount them this heavily. 

The current CPU market share situation dictates differently. They need to make a bigger splash than slightly undercutting Intel hoping for better than average adoption.

[PCGuy_5960]

1 minute ago, Wikiforce said:

AMD is not greedy, unlike Intel.

But AMD is a company trying to make money... I see no reason why they wouldn't charge at least $700 for it, if it can *truly* compete with a 6900K.....

[Techstorm970]

Ok guys...the WCCFTech clock speeds were just boost clocks.  I found a better lineup chart on Forbes, which is more reputable regardless.

http://www.forbes.com/sites/antonyleather/2017/02/12/amd-ryzen-biggest-leak-yet-amazing-benchmarks-and-prices-starting-at-just-129/#54aeae664bb7

 

If you don't wanna go there, here is the chart.

 

[Guest]

2 minutes ago, techstorm970 said:

Ok guys...the WCCFTech clock speeds were just boost clocks.  I found a better lineup chart on Forbes, which is more reputable regardless.

http://www.forbes.com/sites/antonyleather/2017/02/12/amd-ryzen-biggest-leak-yet-amazing-benchmarks-and-prices-starting-at-just-129/#54aeae664bb7

 

If you don't wanna go there, here is the chart.

 

looking at that, would a ryzen 3 1200x and a overclocking board be better than a ryzen 5 1300 and amds alternative to h110?

[PCGuy_5960]

2 minutes ago, Wikiforce said:

they would rather prefer to come back in competition than making huge profits for selling lower amount of chips. They have always cared for consumers alot more than Intel or Nvidia.

The FX-9590 at launch cost more than $800 and it couldn't compete...... Why would they charge just $500 for something that CAN compete!?

[cj09beira]

19 minutes ago, PCGuy_5960 said:

Unless, Intel gets inspired by AMD's 40% IPC improvement and brings a huge IPC improvement with Cannonlake

they simply can't there isn't much that can be done, unless we ditch x86 and try something else.

besides that the only way would be increased clocks, and we are not going much pass 5 ghz either so, expect small improvements, at least for intel.

[PCGuy_5960]

1 minute ago, Wikiforce said:

FX-9590 was a long shot, now i don't think they have any better option as they badly need to come back in market. Otherwise, they might go bankrupt in CPU manufacturing department which no one wants.

You think that an 8 core CPU for the same price as a 6850K wouldn't be appealing? It definitely would!

[Techstorm970]

29 minutes ago, PCGuy_5960 said:

Watch_dogs 2 uses more than 8 threads

Battlefield 1 uses more than 8 threads

Heck, even CS:GO uses more than 8 threads!

Actually, Minecraft uses up to 8 threads, as well.  However, that's only because of how Java works.

[PCGuy_5960]

1 minute ago, techstorm970 said:

Actually, Minecraft uses up to 8 threads, as well.  However, that's only because of how Java works.

I didn't say up to

I said MORE than 8 threads!

[Prysin]

19 minutes ago, Wikiforce said:

AMD is not greedy, unlike Intel.

Ah a hahahahahahahahahahahahaha 

[DrMikeNZ]

9 minutes ago, PCGuy_5960 said:

The FX-9590 at launch cost more than $800 and it couldn't compete...... Why would they charge just $500 for something that CAN compete!?

It seems like AMD marketing have lost their balls.

[Prysin]

7 minutes ago, Wikiforce said:

FX-9590 was a long shot, now i don't think they have any better option as they badly need to come back in market. Otherwise, they might go bankrupt in CPU manufacturing department which no one wants.

Because it cannot compete outside of price 

[cj09beira]

2 minutes ago, DrMikeNZ said:

It seems like AMD marketing have lost their balls.

probably because of mind-share, they have to jump start the idea that amd products are good, and they need attention, if not by advertising by crazy prices

[Nup]

These prices are too low to be true, The r5 1400x (i7 ish looking specs) is dreamy for 200. 

 

That being said, imagine how would the market would respond. Do yous think that low prices could help them shift enough number to gain back some decent share? 

[cj09beira]

3 minutes ago, Nup said:

These prices are too low to be true, The r5 1400x (i7 ish looking specs) is dreamy for 200. 

 

That being said, imagine how would the market would respond. Do yous think that low prices could help them shift enough number to gain back some decent share? 

i believe thats the idea, don't forget ryzen doesn't have graphics, that accounts for part of the price drop.

[Biggerboot]

The prices seem realistic tbh.  I know it's hard to imagine these days, but AMD Athlon 64 use to be the king of value.  And I grew up on Pentiums.  The rumors of a HT i5 are making more sense.

[DrMikeNZ]

9 minutes ago, Nup said:

That being said, imagine how would the market would respond. Do yous think that low prices could help them shift enough number to gain back some decent share? 

If the price and performance are as rumoured, the only thing that will be holding AMD back will be their ability to meet the market demand.

[Wolther]

My next CPU is a Ryzen CPU if this is true. Those prices, hot damn