Jump to content

[INFO] RX 480 VS GTX 1060

RadiatingLight
3 hours ago, RadiatingLight said:

 

 

 

Just wanted to let you know that with the recent NVidia 1060 Driver update boosting performance, I have updated the thread.

You were looking at a benchmark where he was a using a 1266 MHz reference 480. At 1266, the 480 performs like a 390. Hardware Canucks benchmark used a Nitro+ 480 at 1342 MHz. Nothing has changed.

CPU i7 6700 Cooling Cryorig H7 Motherboard MSI H110i Pro AC RAM Kingston HyperX Fury 16GB DDR4 2133 GPU Pulse RX 5700 XT Case Fractal Design Define Mini C Storage Trascend SSD370S 256GB + WD Black 320GB + Sandisk Ultra II 480GB + WD Blue 1TB PSU EVGA GS 550 Display Nixeus Vue24B FreeSync 144 Hz Monitor (VESA mounted) Keyboard Aorus K3 Mechanical Keyboard Mouse Logitech G402 OS Windows 10 Home 64 bit

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, ivan134 said:

You were looking at a benchmark where he was a using a 1266 MHz reference 480. At 1266, the 480 performs like a 390. Hardware Canucks benchmark used a Nitro+ 480 at 1342 MHz. Nothing has changed.

Well IMO factory overclocks shouldn't be considered  unless there are factory overclocks from both sides. so I guess, maybe I fixed the thread?

QUOTE/TAG ME WHEN REPLYING

Spend As Much Time Writing Your Question As You Want Me To Spend Responding To It.

If I'm wrong, please point it out. I'm always learning & I won't bite.

 

Desktop:

Delidded Core i7 4770K - GTX 1070 ROG Strix - 16GB DDR3 - Lots of RGB lights I never change

Laptop:

HP Spectre X360 - i7 8560U - MX150 - 2TB SSD - 16GB DDR4

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, RadiatingLight said:

Well IMO factory overclocks shouldn't be considered  unless there are factory overclocks from both sides. so I guess, maybe I fixed the thread?

I'm just explaining to you why the results look different. There was no driver from Nvidia that boosted performance over what we saw from HardwareCanucks and others benchmarks. Besides Boost 3.0 throws a wrench into the no factory overclock argument.

CPU i7 6700 Cooling Cryorig H7 Motherboard MSI H110i Pro AC RAM Kingston HyperX Fury 16GB DDR4 2133 GPU Pulse RX 5700 XT Case Fractal Design Define Mini C Storage Trascend SSD370S 256GB + WD Black 320GB + Sandisk Ultra II 480GB + WD Blue 1TB PSU EVGA GS 550 Display Nixeus Vue24B FreeSync 144 Hz Monitor (VESA mounted) Keyboard Aorus K3 Mechanical Keyboard Mouse Logitech G402 OS Windows 10 Home 64 bit

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

On ‎2017‎-‎02‎-‎08 at 9:54 AM, RadiatingLight said:

if you want to spend a more for a bit more performance.

Typo, by the way.  Great guide though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, ArduinoBen said:

Typo, by the way.  Great guide though.

Thanks! Fixed.

QUOTE/TAG ME WHEN REPLYING

Spend As Much Time Writing Your Question As You Want Me To Spend Responding To It.

If I'm wrong, please point it out. I'm always learning & I won't bite.

 

Desktop:

Delidded Core i7 4770K - GTX 1070 ROG Strix - 16GB DDR3 - Lots of RGB lights I never change

Laptop:

HP Spectre X360 - i7 8560U - MX150 - 2TB SSD - 16GB DDR4

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

you should mention now that rx 470/480/570/580 now are just like diamonds, everybody searching them for mining + good performance at gaming xD 

Remember to quote me (or someone else), otherwise we won't going to recieve your answers...

 

PC Specs                   PCPartpicker full performance builds (from350$-1250$)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×