Jump to content

4770k to 7700k

Go to solution Solved by SteveGrabowski0,

With that monitor and a Titan X Pascal, yeah, get a 7700k, a high-end board, and the fastest DDR4 you can find. You obviously have lots of money to burn if you're buying that gpu. Get a top of the line liquid cooler too though, because Kaby Lake gets hot AF from what I have read when OC it.

I'm pretty sure my 4770k @ 4.5ghz bottlenecking my Titan X (Pascal) @ 2.1ghz. For regular 60hz I don't think it'd be a problem, but I think my cpu might be limiting me trying to reach 165hz in certain games. You guys think upgrading to a 5.1ghz 7700k would be worth?

i9-11900K @ 5.1ghz;   RTX 3090 FE @ 2ghz;   ROG Maximus XII Hero;   4266mhz G.Skill 16GB DDR4;

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, auraofjason said:

I'm pretty sure my 4770k @ 4.5ghz bottlenecking my Titan X (Pascal) @ 2.1ghz.

No it isn't.

 

There would barely be an improvement going to a 7700K.

i7 4790K || R9 290X + R9 290 || 16GB G.Skill TridentX 1866 || Gigabyte Z97MX Gaming 5 || Crucial MX100 256GB || WD Caviar Blue 1TB

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

It would certainly yield you some performance increase but I'm not sure if that would be worth the money you'd need to spend on an entirely new platform (then again you do have a $1200 GPU so maybe you have the money to do that).

WHIPLASH

CPU: Intel Core i7 6700k @4.7GHz

RAM: Corsair Vengeance RGB DDR4 2x8GB @3000MHz

MOBO: Asus ROG Maximus VIII Ranger

GPU: EVGA GTX 1080 FTW2

PSU: EVGA Supernova 650GS

CASE: Fractal Design Define S

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Litargirio said:

No it isn't.

Yes it probably is. My 6600k (running 100MHz faster than OP's 4770k) is also holding back my GPU and that's only a 1070

WHIPLASH

CPU: Intel Core i7 6700k @4.7GHz

RAM: Corsair Vengeance RGB DDR4 2x8GB @3000MHz

MOBO: Asus ROG Maximus VIII Ranger

GPU: EVGA GTX 1080 FTW2

PSU: EVGA Supernova 650GS

CASE: Fractal Design Define S

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, toasty6776 said:

Yes it probably is.

In CPU bound stuff, maybe. Then again, the difference isn't huge.

 

But if OP really wants the best I guess there is no harm in it.

i7 4790K || R9 290X + R9 290 || 16GB G.Skill TridentX 1866 || Gigabyte Z97MX Gaming 5 || Crucial MX100 256GB || WD Caviar Blue 1TB

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, toasty6776 said:

Yes it probably is. My 6600k (running 100MHz faster than OP's 4770k) is also holding back my GPU and that's only a 1070

That's an i5, i7's are a different matter, i5 has almost had it's day as the recommended gaming chip, games are now starting to prefer cores/threads.

 

@auraofjason I wouldn't take that plunge. If I were you I would wait and see what Ryzen offers, if it aint great go with a X99 build and get a complete platform upgrade rather than just a chip (aka ddr4, quad channel, multi sli, more PCIE lanes, extra cores etc)

 

Ryzen Ram Guide

 

My Project Logs   Iced Blood    Temporal Snow    Temporal Snow Ryzen Refresh

 

CPU - Ryzen 1700 @ 4Ghz  Motherboard - Gigabyte AX370 Aorus Gaming 5   Ram - 16Gb GSkill Trident Z RGB 3200  GPU - Palit 1080GTX Gamerock Premium  Storage - Samsung XP941 256GB, Crucial MX300 525GB, Seagate Barracuda 1TB   PSU - Fractal Design Newton R3 1000W  Case - INWIN 303 White Display - Asus PG278Q Gsync 144hz 1440P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

And who say you would reach that 5.1Ghz?

CPU i7 6700k MB  MSI Z170A Pro Carbon GPU Zotac GTX980Ti amp!extreme RAM 16GB DDR4 Corsair Vengeance 3k CASE Corsair 760T PSU Corsair RM750i MOUSE Logitech G9x KB Logitech G910 HS Sennheiser GSP 500 SC Asus Xonar 7.1 MONITOR Acer Predator xb270hu Storage 1x1TB + 2x500GB Samsung 7200U/m - 2x500GB SSD Samsung 850EVO

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, toasty6776 said:

Yes it probably is. My 6600k (running 100MHz faster than OP's 4770k) is also holding back my GPU and that's only a 1070

What makes you think a 6600K is going to be able to catch up when at stock clocks, the 4770K is faster than the 6600K by 20%~? (when all 8 of it's threads are utilised) :D 

Looking at my signature are we now? Well too bad there's nothing here...

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

What? As I said, there seriously is nothing here :) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, dexT said:

 

1 hour ago, Praesi said:

And who say you would reach that 5.1Ghz?

Yup I would buy it from siliconlottery.

 

 

i9-11900K @ 5.1ghz;   RTX 3090 FE @ 2ghz;   ROG Maximus XII Hero;   4266mhz G.Skill 16GB DDR4;

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Litargirio said:

No it isn't.

 

There would barely be an improvement going to a 7700K.

 

1 hour ago, stealth80 said:

That's an i5, i7's are a different matter, i5 has almost had it's day as the recommended gaming chip, games are now starting to prefer cores/threads.

 

@auraofjason I wouldn't take that plunge. If I were you I would wait and see what Ryzen offers, if it aint great go with a X99 build and get a complete platform upgrade rather than just a chip (aka ddr4, quad channel, multi sli, more PCIE lanes, extra cores etc)

According to this there's 20+ fps improvement in some games: http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-2017-intel-kaby-lake-core-i7-7700k-review

 

Still probably not worth it though, considering it'd be an almost $1000 upgrade for cpu + mobo + ram.

i9-11900K @ 5.1ghz;   RTX 3090 FE @ 2ghz;   ROG Maximus XII Hero;   4266mhz G.Skill 16GB DDR4;

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, auraofjason said:

 

According to this there's 20+ fps improvement in some games: http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-2017-intel-kaby-lake-core-i7-7700k-review

 

Still probably not worth it though, considering it'd be an almost $1000 upgrade for cpu + mobo + ram.

If you look closely though, that affect isn't created by the chip (well I guess it is technically) the difference between 2133 and 3000 MHz memory in some tests at the same cpu speed is like 20% - personally as you already said, that gain isn't worth it. If it was purely a chip change, it would be, but as I said earlier, if you're gonna swap out memory and mobo, you should just go up a platform:

 

CPU: Intel Core i7-7700K 4.2GHz Quad-Core Processor  ($343.89 @ OutletPC)
Motherboard: MSI Z270 KRAIT GAMING ATX LGA1151 Motherboard  ($159.99 @ B&H)
Memory: G.Skill Ripjaws V Series 32GB (4 x 8GB) DDR4-3000 Memory  ($189.99 @ Newegg)
Total: $693.87
Prices include shipping, taxes, and discounts when available
Generated by PCPartPicker 2017-01-28 19:11 EST-0500
 
vs
 
CPU: Intel Core i7-6800K 3.4GHz 6-Core Processor  ($409.99 @ SuperBiiz)
Motherboard: ASRock X99 Taichi ATX LGA2011-3 Motherboard  ($219.99 @ SuperBiiz)
Memory: G.Skill Ripjaws V Series 32GB (4 x 8GB) DDR4-3000 Memory  ($189.99 @ Newegg)
Total: $819.97
Prices include shipping, taxes, and discounts when available
Generated by PCPartPicker 2017-01-28 19:11 EST-0500
 
I know where id like to spend the extra

 

Ryzen Ram Guide

 

My Project Logs   Iced Blood    Temporal Snow    Temporal Snow Ryzen Refresh

 

CPU - Ryzen 1700 @ 4Ghz  Motherboard - Gigabyte AX370 Aorus Gaming 5   Ram - 16Gb GSkill Trident Z RGB 3200  GPU - Palit 1080GTX Gamerock Premium  Storage - Samsung XP941 256GB, Crucial MX300 525GB, Seagate Barracuda 1TB   PSU - Fractal Design Newton R3 1000W  Case - INWIN 303 White Display - Asus PG278Q Gsync 144hz 1440P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

With that monitor and a Titan X Pascal, yeah, get a 7700k, a high-end board, and the fastest DDR4 you can find. You obviously have lots of money to burn if you're buying that gpu. Get a top of the line liquid cooler too though, because Kaby Lake gets hot AF from what I have read when OC it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 1/28/2017 at 4:18 PM, SteveGrabowski0 said:

With that monitor and a Titan X Pascal, yeah, get a 7700k, a high-end board, and the fastest DDR4 you can find. You obviously have lots of money to burn if you're buying that gpu. Get a top of the line liquid cooler too though, because Kaby Lake gets hot AF from what I have read when OC it.

So just an update, I went ahead and went with your suggestion. Got one of the highest end boards and fastest DDR4. I'm getting 20+ fps increases in games like GTA5, which is very nice and noticeable on my 165hz monitor xD. I got it delidded so it's only 70c at 5.1ghz stress testing.

 

Feels better knowing that I'm getting my moneys worth out of my Titan XP now and not bottlenecking it anymore. Thanks for the suggestions everyone.

i9-11900K @ 5.1ghz;   RTX 3090 FE @ 2ghz;   ROG Maximus XII Hero;   4266mhz G.Skill 16GB DDR4;

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, auraofjason said:

So just an update, I went ahead and went with your suggestion. Got one of the highest end boards and fastest DDR4. I'm getting 20+ fps increases in games like GTA5, which is very nice and noticeable on my 165hz monitor xD. I got it delidded so it's only 70c at 5.1ghz stress testing.

 

Feels better knowing that I'm getting my moneys worth out of my Titan XP now and not bottlenecking it anymore. Thanks for the suggestions everyone.

 

That's fantastic!  It's also a great example of why you shouldn't sit on the sidelines as some people do theorizing that something won't be better.  They'll hold you back every time.


Congrats man. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, auraofjason said:

So just an update, I went ahead and went with your suggestion. Got one of the highest end boards and fastest DDR4. I'm getting 20+ fps increases in games like GTA5, which is very nice and noticeable on my 165hz monitor xD. I got it delidded so it's only 70c at 5.1ghz stress testing.

 

Feels better knowing that I'm getting my moneys worth out of my Titan XP now and not bottlenecking it anymore. Thanks for the suggestions everyone.

God damn, 5.1 GHz and 70C on air cooling

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×