Jump to content

Did I Win the Silicon Lottery? (GTX 1070 FTW)

So recently, I got myself a GTX 1070 FTW (EVGA) and I decided to overclock it since I got my new 6600k which I also overclocked to 4.6GHz on stock voltages. I was surprised about the results I got. On stock voltage, I got an extra 125MHz on the core clock, which landed me at just over 2100MHz, while staying under 65C. I decided to also run a few benchmarks due to this, so here's my specs then my userbenchmark run.

 

-i5 6600K @ 4.6GHz

-EVGA GTX 1070 FTW@ ~2100MHz

-ASUS Z-170-AR

-Corsair RM1000x PSU

 

Need any more specs? Ask below.

 

Userbenchmark Run

 

Now here's where I stumble across something weird... When I ran PerformanceTest 9.0, I got a G3D Score of over 14,500 (~14,930 if I remember correctly) on it, which if I am not mistaken is a BIT out of line. If the rest of the site is legit about their benchmarks, apparently my 1070 is faster than the Titan XP? This would make my 1070 have 3000 points above the stock 1070 through the benchmarks. Please correct me on this if I am wrong. 

 

Passmark GPU List

 

I currently am not at my PC so I can't get the screenshots, but I will try to get them and post them here tomorrow if possible.

 

Thanks! :) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you said 2200 yes but it isn't so no, not really.

[Out-of-date] Want to learn how to make your own custom Windows 10 image?

 

Desktop: AMD R9 3900X | ASUS ROG Strix X570-F | Radeon RX 5700 XT | EVGA GTX 1080 SC | 32GB Trident Z Neo 3600MHz | 1TB 970 EVO | 256GB 840 EVO | 960GB Corsair Force LE | EVGA G2 850W | Phanteks P400S

Laptop: Intel M-5Y10c | Intel HD Graphics | 8GB RAM | 250GB Micron SSD | Asus UX305FA

Server 01: Intel Xeon D 1541 | ASRock Rack D1541D4I-2L2T | 32GB Hynix ECC DDR4 | 4x8TB Western Digital HDDs | 32TB Raw 16TB Usable

Server 02: Intel i7 7700K | Gigabye Z170N Gaming5 | 16GB Trident Z 3200MHz

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe titan X not titan XP. there is no way that the 1070 is that fast

QUOTE/TAG ME WHEN REPLYING

Spend As Much Time Writing Your Question As You Want Me To Spend Responding To It.

If I'm wrong, please point it out. I'm always learning & I won't bite.

 

Desktop:

Delidded Core i7 4770K - GTX 1070 ROG Strix - 16GB DDR3 - Lots of RGB lights I never change

Laptop:

HP Spectre X360 - i7 8560U - MX150 - 2TB SSD - 16GB DDR4

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, DeadEyePsycho said:

If you said 2200 yes but it isn't so no, not really.

That's really good for a 1060 overclock. keep in mind that a 1080 reaching 2.1Ghz is much less impressive than a 1060 reaching 2.1Ghz. This is because a 1060 has a much lower base/boost clock that a 1080

QUOTE/TAG ME WHEN REPLYING

Spend As Much Time Writing Your Question As You Want Me To Spend Responding To It.

If I'm wrong, please point it out. I'm always learning & I won't bite.

 

Desktop:

Delidded Core i7 4770K - GTX 1070 ROG Strix - 16GB DDR3 - Lots of RGB lights I never change

Laptop:

HP Spectre X360 - i7 8560U - MX150 - 2TB SSD - 16GB DDR4

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Palits hit 2100, A Gigabyte Xtreme gaming review sample hit around 2176

 

Ryzen Ram Guide

 

My Project Logs   Iced Blood    Temporal Snow    Temporal Snow Ryzen Refresh

 

CPU - Ryzen 1700 @ 4Ghz  Motherboard - Gigabyte AX370 Aorus Gaming 5   Ram - 16Gb GSkill Trident Z RGB 3200  GPU - Palit 1080GTX Gamerock Premium  Storage - Samsung XP941 256GB, Crucial MX300 525GB, Seagate Barracuda 1TB   PSU - Fractal Design Newton R3 1000W  Case - INWIN 303 White Display - Asus PG278Q Gsync 144hz 1440P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, RadiatingLight said:

That's really good for a 1060 overclock. keep in mind that a 1080 reaching 2.1Ghz is much less impressive than a 1060 reaching 2.1Ghz. This is because a 1060 has a much lower base/boost clock that a 1080

He said 1070, why are you talking about a 1060?

[Out-of-date] Want to learn how to make your own custom Windows 10 image?

 

Desktop: AMD R9 3900X | ASUS ROG Strix X570-F | Radeon RX 5700 XT | EVGA GTX 1080 SC | 32GB Trident Z Neo 3600MHz | 1TB 970 EVO | 256GB 840 EVO | 960GB Corsair Force LE | EVGA G2 850W | Phanteks P400S

Laptop: Intel M-5Y10c | Intel HD Graphics | 8GB RAM | 250GB Micron SSD | Asus UX305FA

Server 01: Intel Xeon D 1541 | ASRock Rack D1541D4I-2L2T | 32GB Hynix ECC DDR4 | 4x8TB Western Digital HDDs | 32TB Raw 16TB Usable

Server 02: Intel i7 7700K | Gigabye Z170N Gaming5 | 16GB Trident Z 3200MHz

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, DeadEyePsycho said:

He said 1070, why are you talking about a 1060?

oh oops.

well then less impressive

QUOTE/TAG ME WHEN REPLYING

Spend As Much Time Writing Your Question As You Want Me To Spend Responding To It.

If I'm wrong, please point it out. I'm always learning & I won't bite.

 

Desktop:

Delidded Core i7 4770K - GTX 1070 ROG Strix - 16GB DDR3 - Lots of RGB lights I never change

Laptop:

HP Spectre X360 - i7 8560U - MX150 - 2TB SSD - 16GB DDR4

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Congratz, especially since you are happy about it man. :)

 

(I find your CPU overclock incredibly impressive...maybe I'm just a newb though.)

|  The United Empire of Earth Wants You | The Stormborn (ongoing build; 90% done)  |  Skyrim Mods Recommendations  LTT Blue Forum Theme! | Learning Russian! Blog |
|"They got a war on drugs so the police can bother me.”Tupac Shakur  | "Half of writing history is hiding the truth"Captain Malcolm Reynolds | "Museums are racist."Michelle Obama | "Slap a word like "racist" or "nazi" on it and you'll have an army at your back."MSM Logic | "A new command I give you: love one another. As I have loved you, so you must love one another"Jesus Christ | "I love the Union and the Constitution, but I would rather leave the Union with the Constitution than remain in the Union without it."Jefferson Davis |

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

2100MHz is pretty standard, and 65C is more a matter of your cooler and less so of your chip.

We have a NEW and GLORIOUSER-ER-ER PSU Tier List Now. (dammit @LukeSavenije stop coming up with new ones)

You can check out the old one that gave joy to so many across the land here

 

Computer having a hard time powering on? Troubleshoot it with this guide. (Currently looking for suggestions to update it into the context of <current year> and make it its own thread)

Computer Specs:

Spoiler

Mathresolvermajig: Intel Xeon E3 1240 (Sandy Bridge i7 equivalent)

Chillinmachine: Noctua NH-C14S
Framepainting-inator: EVGA GTX 1080 Ti SC2 Hybrid

Attachcorethingy: Gigabyte H61M-S2V-B3

Infoholdstick: Corsair 2x4GB DDR3 1333

Computerarmor: Silverstone RL06 "Lookalike"

Rememberdoogle: 1TB HDD + 120GB TR150 + 240 SSD Plus + 1TB MX500

AdditionalPylons: Phanteks AMP! 550W (based on Seasonic GX-550)

Letterpad: Rosewill Apollo 9100 (Cherry MX Red)

Buttonrodent: Razer Viper Mini + Huion H430P drawing Tablet

Auralnterface: Sennheiser HD 6xx

Liquidrectangles: LG 27UK850-W 4K HDR

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, RektSkrubs said:

So recently, I got myself a GTX 1070 FTW (EVGA) and I decided to overclock it since I got my new 6600k which I also overclocked to 4.6GHz on stock voltages. I was surprised about the results I got. On stock voltage, I got an extra 125MHz on the core clock, which landed me at just over 2100MHz, while staying under 65C. I decided to also run a few benchmarks due to this, so here's my specs then my userbenchmark run.

 

A lot of GTX 1070s reach 2100 Mhz on the core, and mine does as well, but it's a good speed, regardless. Be sure to also overclock your memory as well, as there is as much performance to be gained from doing that as there is from overclocking the core speed.

 

Quote

I got a G3D Score of over 14,500 (~14,930 if I remember correctly) on it, which if I am not mistaken is a BIT out of line. If the rest of the site is legit about their benchmarks, apparently my 1070 is faster than the Titan XP?

 

Check which settings you're running the test at. You might be comparing your 1070 score to a Titan XP score that is for a higher resolution, or something.

You own the software that you purchase - Understanding software licenses and EULAs

 

"We’ll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the american public believes is false" - William Casey, CIA Director 1981-1987

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Every GTX 1070 and 1080 will get 2000-2200MHz.

Average is about 2075-2100.

This is regardless of brand, factory overclock, etc.

If you happen to get over 2200, then that would be really impressive, because so far I have only seen a handful of people do it.

Anything below 2200 is pretty standard, you can get this even with just air cooling.

NEW PC build: Blank Heaven   minimalist white and black PC     Old S340 build log "White Heaven"        The "LIGHTCANON" flashlight build log        Project AntiRoll (prototype)        Custom speaker project

Spoiler

Ryzen 3950X | AMD Vega Frontier Edition | ASUS X570 Pro WS | Corsair Vengeance LPX 64GB | NZXT H500 | Seasonic Prime Fanless TX-700 | Custom loop | Coolermaster SK630 White | Logitech MX Master 2S | Samsung 980 Pro 1TB + 970 Pro 512GB | Samsung 58" 4k TV | Scarlett 2i4 | 2x AT2020

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

My ASUS Strix GTX 1070 reaches 2050 in its OC mode, I don't know if this is comparable or not.  Similar temps.

For the Best builds and Price lists here is a world where many points of the price have been predefined already for your convenience!

The Xeon E3 1231 V3 IS BETTER Than the Core i5 4690K and a Significantly better value for the non-overclockers or value shoppers.

The OS is like a kind food, Try it before saying if you like it or don't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Enderman said:

Every GTX 1070 and 1080 will get 2000-2200MHz.

Average is about 2075-2100.

This is regardless of brand, factory overclock, etc.

If you happen to get over 2200, then that would be really impressive, because so far I have only seen a handful of people do it.

Anything below 2200 is pretty standard, you can get this even with just air cooling.

This a custom voltage curve I saw, that someone used for getting above 2200 Mhz on their 1070. I haven't tried it yet, myself.

 

BrQSkYm.png

You own the software that you purchase - Understanding software licenses and EULAs

 

"We’ll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the american public believes is false" - William Casey, CIA Director 1981-1987

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thats not very good. You got average

He who asks is stupid for 5 minutes. He who does not ask, remains stupid. -Chinese proverb. 

Those who know much are aware that they know little. - Slick roasting me

Spoiler

AXIOM

CPU- Intel i5-6500 GPU- EVGA 1060 6GB Motherboard- Gigabyte GA-H170-D3H RAM- 8GB HyperX DDR4-2133 PSU- EVGA GQ 650w HDD- OEM 750GB Seagate Case- NZXT S340 Mouse- Logitech Gaming g402 Keyboard-  Azio MGK1 Headset- HyperX Cloud Core

Offical first poster LTT V2.0

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

He is saying he got 2100mhz on stock voltage, so in theory if he boosts stock voltage, he should be able to attain a higher core clock. 

 

So yeah, I'd say that's probably reasonably impressive. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, RektSkrubs said:

I got my new 6600k which I also overclocked to 4.6GHz on stock voltages

The core voltage setting for your motherboard is set to Auto by default. Unless you had manually set the voltage, a 4.6ghz oc pull as much voltage as it needs and it wouldn't be anywhere close to stock voltages. If that's the case, you might want to make sure your temps aren't too high.

If you ever need help with a build, read the following before posting: http://linustechtips.com/main/topic/3061-build-plan-thread-recommendations-please-read-before-posting/
Also, make sure to quote a post or tag a member when replying or else they won't get a notification that you replied to them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, WoodenMarker said:

The core voltage setting for your motherboard is set to Auto by default. Unless you had manually set the voltage, a 4.6ghz oc pull as much voltage as it needs and it wouldn't be anywhere close to stock voltages. If that's the case, you might want to make sure your temps aren't too high.

I was thinking this is probably the case too.

 

Also this is not really relevant to this thread, but why do people prefer to do the voltage manually? Is it because if it's on auto it can pull more than you need? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CaptainGunny said:

I was thinking this is probably the case too.

Also this is not really relevant to this thread, but why do people prefer to do the voltage manually? Is it because if it's on auto it can pull more than you need? 

The Auto setting will usually use much higher voltage than necessary especially when oc'ing.

If you ever need help with a build, read the following before posting: http://linustechtips.com/main/topic/3061-build-plan-thread-recommendations-please-read-before-posting/
Also, make sure to quote a post or tag a member when replying or else they won't get a notification that you replied to them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

why don't you try Firestrike so the results are more comparable?

CPU: Intel i7 5820K @ 4.20 GHz | MotherboardMSI X99S SLI PLUS | RAM: Corsair LPX 16GB DDR4 @ 2666MHz | GPU: Sapphire R9 Fury (x2 CrossFire)
Storage: Samsung 950Pro 512GB // OCZ Vector150 240GB // Seagate 1TB | PSU: Seasonic 1050 Snow Silent | Case: NZXT H440 | Cooling: Nepton 240M
FireStrike // Extreme // Ultra // 8K // 16K

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, CaptainGunny said:

I was thinking this is probably the case too.

Also this is not really relevant to this thread, but why do people prefer to do the voltage manually? Is it because if it's on auto it can pull more than you need? 

As stated above, the auto setting tends to really overdo it. It's even worse if you use the motherboard software and let it overclock for you.

 

I remember on auto, my 2500K at 4.6GHz was being fed 1.45v. Manual voltage, it works fine at 1.39v. I also tried the ASUS OC tuner on the extreme preset just for lolz, and it was getting to 5.1GHz at 1.52 vcore...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, scottyseng said:

As stated above, the auto setting tends to really overdo it. It's even worse if you use the motherboard software and let it overclock for you.

 

I remember on auto, my 2500K at 4.6GHz was being fed 1.45v. Manual voltage, it works fine at 1.39v. I also tried the ASUS OC tuner on the extreme preset just for lolz, and it was getting to 5.1GHz at 1.52 vcore...

Wow. Thanks for clearing that up. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't want to feel you bad, but 90% of GTX 1070 can handle 2050 without any problems.

And same goes for 2101.

 

I got mine at around 2150 max. Anything after that bring me bugged display.

I'm sorry, but I don't think your GTX 1070 is silicon winner.

 

In my opinion silicon winner is GPU that can handle 2200MHz or above. But haven't seen many of those.

Intel i7 12700K | Gigabyte Z690 Gaming X DDR4 | Pure Loop 240mm | G.Skill 3200MHz 32GB CL14 | CM V850 G2 | RTX 3070 Phoenix | Lian Li O11 Air mini

Samsung EVO 960 M.2 250GB | Samsung EVO 860 PRO 512GB | 4x Be Quiet! Silent Wings 140mm fans

WD My Cloud 4TB

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, RadiatingLight said:

That's really good for a 1060 overclock. keep in mind that a 1080 reaching 2.1Ghz is much less impressive than a 1060 reaching 2.1Ghz. This is because a 1060 has a much lower base/boost clock that a 1080

It's actually easier for the lesser chips to hit higher clocks, since they have less power draw, less thermal noise, and less cores to clock that high. Think quad core CPU vs 6 core or 8 core, etc.

Stuff:  i7 7700k @ (dat nibba succ) | ASRock Z170M OC Formula | G.Skill TridentZ 3600 c16 | EKWB 1080 @ 2100 mhz  |  Acer X34 Predator | R4 | EVGA 1000 P2 | 1080mm Radiator Custom Loop | HD800 + Audio-GD NFB-11 | 850 Evo 1TB | 840 Pro 256GB | 3TB WD Blue | 2TB Barracuda

Hwbot: http://hwbot.org/user/lays/ 

FireStrike 980 ti @ 1800 Mhz http://hwbot.org/submission/3183338 http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/11574089

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×