Jump to content

Single 250GB SSD or dual 120GB RAID 0 SSDs in a 2010 MacBook

Hi.

 

I've had my very reliable 2010 MacBook for a few years now, and I upgraded it to a 120GB SanDisk SSD a while back. Unfortunately it didn't have enough space on it for me, so I upgraded to dual 120GB SanDisk SSDs, however the RAID appeared to fail on a software level, so I returned to the 120GB SSD, and then upgraded to a 250GB Samsung 850 EVO.

 

It was an absolute pain trying to configure the RAID under El Capitan, and it was because RAID functionality had been removed from Disk Utility. I configured it within Terminal, but I'm more than certain I did something wrong because the RAID failed, but the drives are still perfectly fine, so I believe that I have done something wrong.

 

Since upgrading to Sierra, I've noticed that integrated RAID functionality within Disk Utility has returned! Huzzah! I am thinking about re-configuring the RAID, and repurposing the Samsung SSD in my main machine, which is my Gaming PC, which, unfortunately, only has a 120GB SSD, and I find it limiting.

 

So, the plan is as follows.

 

I've got two 120GB SanDisk SSDs, that will be put into my MacBook for a RAID 0, with my Time Machine backup to ensure maximum safety.

The Samsung SSD in my MacBook will be transferred to my Gaming PC because RAID 0 on that machine is very risky for I don't have a backup drive for it.

Then I'm left with the current boot drive in my Gaming PC, a Kingston 120GB SSD which I can put anywhere, or even gift onto a family member who has a slower laptop with SATA 3.

 

So, what I want to know from you guys is:

1. Is it worth going for RAID 0 again? I already have all of the brackets, and they are just collecting dust in my drawer.

2. Is the speed increase noticeable from RAID 0 in an older Mac? My Mac only has SATA 2 so I'm hoping that with RAID, it'll work a bit faster, which would be optimal.

3. What should I do with the extra 120GB Kingston SSD? I don't own another machine with SATA, so I will either gift it on or I might buy a SATA USB 3.0 enclosure for the drive to replace my 1TB external HDD which I take everywhere with me. The only thing with the SSD is that it isn't big enough to hold all of my files on it, because on the USB hard drive, I've got close to 500GB worth of files, and some of which can be deleted, when I get time to go through the entire drive and remove them.

 

All of your guys' ideas will be heard, and I can't wait to see what you guys come up with!

 

PS: I know that my dad has a few machines that he uses, only with hard drives in them. He's got his desktop, with a Pentium dual-core, 4GB of RAM and a 160GB Hard Drive off of the iGPU, and a 17" HP laptop with a Core 2 Duo at 2GHz, 4GB of RAM, and a hard drive with I can't remember GB (either 160GB or 250GB) with an ATI Mobility Radeon something that I can't remember.

 

Thanks so much guys,

-Alpha.

2017 Gaming PC

Excellent value machine, keeps me going.

CPU: Intel Core i5-6600K | GPU: Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 8GB | RAM: 16GB DDR4 | Motherboard: MSI Z170A XPOWER GAMING TITANIUM

PSU: Casecom 600W PSU | Case: Corsair Graphite 230T | SSD: Samsung 850 EVO 250GB | HDD: 3TB WD Blue

Dell XPS 15 9560

Beautiful laptop, in a stunning form factor.

CPU: Intel Core i7-7700HQ | GPU: Intel HD Graphics 630/Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 (not mobile, full GPU) | RAM: 16GB DDR4 | SSD: 512GB SK Hynix SSD

Display: 4K IPS 100% Adobe RGB Touch Panel | I/O: Two USB 3.0 with PowerShare, HDMI, 3.5mm Headphone Jack, SD Card Slot, and Thunderbolt 3 USB-C

Samsung Galaxy S8 64GB | Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 32GB

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Id stick with a sinlge ssd. You won't notice the speed difference, your gonna be cpu limited.

 

Id put the other ssd in the cd drive and the last one in in a usb or firewire external drive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Single ssd, speed difference won't be noticeable in daily use and you have a bugged disk of failure in raid0

******If you paste in text into your post, please click the "remove formatting" button for night theme users.******

CPU- Intel 6700k OC to 4.69 Ghz GPU- NVidia Geforce GTX 970 (MSI) RAM- 16gb DDR4 2400 SSD-2x500gb samsung 850 EVO(SATA) Raid 0 HDD- 2tb Seagate Case- H440 Red w/ custom lighting Motherboard - MSI Z170 Gaming A OS- Windows 10 Mouse- Razer Naga Epic Chroma, Final Mouse 2016 turney proKeyboard- Corsair k70 Cherry MX brown

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

I never suggest RAID0ing 2 SSDs in a normal PC. Single SSD is way better in every perspective.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

RAIDing SSDs removes endurance keeping features (TRIM)

 

So if they're anything but the highest end they'll wear out very quickly, not to mention not be faster than a single one anyway :P

We have a NEW and GLORIOUSER-ER-ER PSU Tier List Now. (dammit @LukeSavenije stop coming up with new ones)

You can check out the old one that gave joy to so many across the land here

 

Computer having a hard time powering on? Troubleshoot it with this guide. (Currently looking for suggestions to update it into the context of <current year> and make it its own thread)

Computer Specs:

Spoiler

Mathresolvermajig: Intel Xeon E3 1240 (Sandy Bridge i7 equivalent)

Chillinmachine: Noctua NH-C14S
Framepainting-inator: EVGA GTX 1080 Ti SC2 Hybrid

Attachcorethingy: Gigabyte H61M-S2V-B3

Infoholdstick: Corsair 2x4GB DDR3 1333

Computerarmor: Silverstone RL06 "Lookalike"

Rememberdoogle: 1TB HDD + 120GB TR150 + 240 SSD Plus + 1TB MX500

AdditionalPylons: Phanteks AMP! 550W (based on Seasonic GX-550)

Letterpad: Rosewill Apollo 9100 (Cherry MX Red)

Buttonrodent: Razer Viper Mini + Huion H430P drawing Tablet

Auralnterface: Sennheiser HD 6xx

Liquidrectangles: LG 27UK850-W 4K HDR

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, AlphaGamer46 said:

~snip~

Hello :)

RAID0 offers good speed boosts to sequential read/write speeds but has little effect on the random ones which matter more for everyday usage and OS responsiveness. Add this to the increased risk of failure and you'd see that a single larger SSD may be the better option fora boot drive and probably add a second storage HDD without putting the drives in a RAID array. 

Having a solid and a current backup when handling data with RAID0 arrays is essential for your data's safety as recovering data from a failed RAID0 with SSDs is nearly impossible. 

Let me know if you have any additional questions. 

Captain_WD. 

If this helped you, like and choose it as best answer - you might help someone else with the same issue. ^_^
WDC Representative, http://www.wdc.com/ 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×